Epidural and Intravenous Fentanyl Infusions Are Clinically Equivalent After Knee Surgery

The management of postoperative pain with continuous epidural fentanyl infusion was compared with continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion. In a randomized, double-blind protocol we prospectively studied 20 patients undergoing repair of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. The quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects were documented. Compared with patients receiving continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion, at 18 h postoperatively patients given continuous epidural fentanyl infusion reported similar pain scores both at rest (22 ± 25 vs 27 ± 21 P = 0.52) and with ambulation (59 ± 18 vs 56 ± 22, P = 0.82). Plasma fentanyl levels were 1.8 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.4 ng/m.L (P = 0.91) for the intravenous and epidural groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of nausea, pruritus, or urinary retention. There was no respiratory depression in either group. We conclude that when compared with continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion, continuous epidural fentanyl infusion offers no clinical advantages for the management of postoperative pain after knee surgery.

[1]  K. Thon,et al.  Relative analgesic potency of epidural fentanyl, alfentanil, and morphine in treatment of postoperative pain. , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[2]  E. Orav,et al.  A Statistical Model for Pain in Patient‐Controlled Analgesia and Conventional Intramuscular Opioid Regimens , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  F. Holley,et al.  Postoperative analgesia with fentanyl: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of constant-rate i.v. and transdermal delivery. , 1988, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  Michael J. Cousins,et al.  Fentanyl Blood Concentration‐Analgesic Response Relationship in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  J. Plummer,et al.  The influence of drug polarity on the absorption of opioid drugs into CSF and subsequent cephalad migration following lumbar epidural administration: application to morphine and pethidine , 1987, Pain.

[6]  J. S. Goldberg,et al.  Use of Patient Controlled Analgesia to Compare Intravenous to Epidural Administration of Fentanyl in the Postoperative Patient , 1987 .

[7]  N. Rawal,et al.  Present state of extradural and intrathecal opioid analgesia in Sweden. A nationwide follow-up survey. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  D. Duthie,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl during constant rate i.v. infusion for the relief of pain after surgery. , 1986, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  R. Moore,et al.  Dural permeability to narcotics: in vitro determination and application to extradural administration. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  E. Welchew,et al.  Continuous thoracic epidural fentanyl , 1982 .

[11]  Y. Shir.  Intrathecal Opioids, Potency and Lipophilicity. , 1989, Pain.

[12]  R. Berman,et al.  The use of continuous lumbar epidural fentanyl for post operative pain relief in thoracotamies , 1988, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[13]  L. Mather,et al.  Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. , 1984, Anesthesiology.

[14]  A Villers Ruiz,et al.  Statistical package for the social sciences (spss) , 1981 .