Beyond Enterprise Architecture Modeling - What are the Essentials to Support Enterprise Transformations?

In recent years, many different modeling techniques and languages were developed in order to allow for an efficient and appropriate enterprise architecture management (EAM). Recently, EAM is no longer only seen as a means to ensure business/IT aligment but further as a means to support fundamental changes of the organization, often called enterprise transformation (ET). In a joint project with a group of practitioners we aim at developing a framework that provides guidance on how EAM can support such ETs and thus leverage the benefit of modeling. Our design results after more than one year of research reveal different types of EAM, areas of action in ETs and ET activities that can be supported by EAM. The findings show that modeling techniques or languages should focus on constructs like transitions, benefits or risks in order to increase their value for ET support.

[1]  Robert Winter,et al.  Restructuring the Design Science Research Knowledge Base : A One-Cycle View of Design Science Research and its Consequences for Understanding Organizational Design Problems , 2013 .

[2]  Kari Luostarinen,et al.  Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - Enterprise architecture as a coordination tool , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[3]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Informed Governance of Enterprise Transformations , 2009, PRET.

[4]  Marc M. Lankhorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[5]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier than You Think , 2011 .

[6]  J. Kotter Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  IT-enabled organizational transformation: a case study of BPR failure at TELECO , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems ( MCIS ) 1-1-2012 ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE AS A MEANS FOR COORDINATION – AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL PRACTICE , 2012 .

[9]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  ArchiMate 2.0 Specification , 2012 .

[10]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Enterprise modeling and enterprise transformation , 2007, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[11]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Enabling Strategic Transformations with Enterprise Systems: Beyond Operational Efficiency , 2010, ICIS.

[12]  Colin Price,et al.  Beyond Performance: How Great Organizations Build Ultimate Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[13]  Daniel M. Yellin,et al.  Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Jeff Madura,et al.  Valuing the Potential Transformation of Banks into Financial Service Conglomerates: Evidence from the Citigroup Merger , 2000 .

[15]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[16]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Application of Enterprise Models for Engineering Enterprise Transformation , 2010, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[17]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  H. Tikkanen,et al.  Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia , 2011 .

[19]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Theodore T. Herbert,et al.  Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate , 1977 .

[21]  Robert Winter,et al.  Enterprise Architecture and Transformation: The Differences and the Synergy Potential of Enterprise Architecture and Business Transformation Management , 2013 .

[22]  Axel Uhl,et al.  A Handbook of Business Transformation Management Methodology , 2012 .

[23]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[24]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[25]  Robert Winter,et al.  Two Speeds of EAM - A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective , 2012, TEAR/PRET.

[26]  Boris Otto,et al.  Principles for Knowledge Creation in Collaborative Design Science Research , 2012, ICIS.

[27]  Patrick Delfmann,et al.  Supporting Enterprise Transformation using a Universal Model Analysis Approach , 2012, ECIS.

[28]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[29]  I. Barreto Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .

[30]  Frank Radeke,et al.  Toward Understanding Enterprise Architecture Management's Role in Strategic Change: Antecedents, Processes, Outcomes , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[31]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[32]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Enterprise transformation , 2006, CACM.

[33]  Barbara Dinter,et al.  Situational Method Engineering to Support Process-Oriented Information Logistics: Identification of Development Situations , 2012, J. Database Manag..