Social acceptability of establishing forest-based biorefineries in Maine, United States

Abstract Forest-based biomass has a significant role to play in the development of a renewable U.S. energy portfolio, especially in the context of mandated cellulosic biofuel production requirements. Biorefinery development has the potential to create economic, environmental, and social benefits. In Maine, co-location opportunities for biorefineries and existing pulp and paper manufacturing facilities could strengthen industry and mill communities. Understanding general public and local perceptions of bioenergy industries and products may play a key role in their establishment, success, and sustainability. Our aim was to compare the general Maine public and mill towns in their support for forest-based biorefineries, and we surveyed: (1) Statewide residents, and (2) Mill Town residents from 10 communities with major pulp and paper facilities. We found differences between local and state support for biorefineries across all response categories. Mill Town respondents were significantly more supportive of biorefinery projects in their communities, and overall the potential positive impacts of biorefineries were rated higher than the potential negative impacts. Both groups preferred facility siting at pulp mills no longer in operation, and Mill Town respondents expressed less concern about potential negative impacts than Statewide respondents. Our findings provide important insight into forest-based biorefinery issues important to communities. We encourage policy makers, industry leaders, and researchers to use our results as a foundation to actively engage statewide and local communities future biorefinery policies and siting proposals.

[1]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Science communication reconsidered , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[3]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making , 2015 .

[4]  Alison Mohr,et al.  Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels☆ , 2013, Energy Policy.

[5]  R. Lilieholm.  Forging a Common Vision for Maine’s North Woods , 2007 .

[6]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Pollution concerns in context: a comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory , 2004 .

[7]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[8]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies , 2014 .

[9]  M. Stidham,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives on converting forest biomass to energy in Oregon, USA , 2011 .

[10]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[11]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[12]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[13]  Robert I. Radics,et al.  Public perception of bioenergy in North Carolina and Tennessee , 2016 .

[14]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article SELF-REGULATORY FAILURE: A Resource-Depletion Approach , 2022 .

[15]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[16]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[17]  Alec Giffen.  The Economic Importance and Wood Flows from Maine's Forests, 2007 , 2007 .

[18]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels , 2010 .

[19]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power , 2017 .

[20]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Does human perception of wetland aesthetics and healthiness relate to ecological functioning? , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming , 2005 .

[22]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[23]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[24]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[25]  Michael Taylor,et al.  An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[26]  E. Einsiedel,et al.  What drives public acceptance of second-generation biofuels? Evidence from Canada , 2015 .

[27]  D. Horst,et al.  National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant , 2004 .

[28]  P. Pelkonen,et al.  Growing trade of bioenergy in the EU: Public acceptability, policy harmonization, European standards and certification needs , 2011 .

[29]  Holly Longstaff,et al.  Fostering citizen deliberations on the social acceptability of renewable fuels policy: The case of advanced lignocellulosic biofuels in Canada , 2015 .

[30]  Harry N. Boone,et al.  Analyzing Likert Data , 2012, Journal of Extension.

[31]  Weston M. Eaton.  What's the problem? How ‘industrial culture’ shapes community responses to proposed bioenergy development in northern Michigan, USA , 2016 .

[32]  N. Nachar.  The Mann ‐ Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution , 2007 .

[33]  E. Zervas,et al.  Public acceptance of biofuels , 2010 .

[34]  Bruce Shindler,et al.  Formation of Social Acceptability Judgments and Their Implications for Management of Rare and Little‐Known Species , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? , 2010 .

[36]  Dana M. Johnson,et al.  Upper Midwestern U.S. consumers and ethanol: Knowledge, beliefs and consumption , 2011 .

[37]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[38]  J. Vaske.  Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation and Human Dimensions , 2008 .

[39]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Public attitudes toward biofuels , 2012, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[40]  W. Firey,et al.  Man, Mind and Land: A Theory of Resource Use. , 1961 .

[41]  Yuriko Saito.  Machines in the Ocean: The Aesthetics of Wind Farms , 2004 .

[42]  Jessica E. Leahy,et al.  Factors affecting public support for forest-based biorefineries: a comparison of mill towns and the general public in Maine, USA. , 2014 .

[43]  R. Lilieholm,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for the Northeastern Forest Bioindustry , 2009 .

[44]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[45]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources , 2011 .

[46]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry , 2011 .

[47]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon , 2010 .

[48]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[49]  Linda Steg,et al.  Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda , 2014 .

[50]  Bishnu Raj Upreti,et al.  Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales , 2004 .

[51]  Chad M. Hellwinckel,et al.  The updated billion-ton resource assessment , 2014 .

[52]  R. Lilieholm,et al.  Developing a sustainable forest biomass industry: case of the US northeast. , 2009 .

[53]  D. Bell,et al.  Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .

[54]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Environmental sustainability of wood-derived ethanol: a life cycle evaluation of resource intensity and emissions in Maine, USA , 2013 .

[55]  Michael E. Goerndt,et al.  Drivers of biomass co-firing in U.S. coal-fired power plants , 2013 .