The geomorphological unit hydrograph from a historical‐critical perspective

In this paper we present a brief overview of geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) theories and analyze their successful path without hiding their limitations. The history of the GIUH is subdivided into three major sections. The first is based on the milestone works of Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes (Water Resources Research 1979; 15(6): 1409–1420) and Gupta et al. (Water Resources Research 1980; 16(5): 855–862), which recognized that a treatment of water discharges with ‘travel times’ could provide a rich interpretation of the theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph (IUH). We show how this was possible, what assumptions were made, which of these assumptions can be relaxed, and which have become obsolete and been discarded. The second section focuses on the width-function-based IUH (WFIUH) approach and its achievements in assessing the interplay of the topology and geometry of the network with water dynamics. The limitations of the WFIUH approach are described, and a way to work around them is suggested. Finally, a new formal approach to estimating the water budget by ‘travel times’, which derives from a suitable use of the water budget equation and some hypotheses, has been introduced and disentangled. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Andrea Antonello,et al.  The JGrass-NewAge system for forecasting and managing the hydrological budgets at the basin scale: models of flow generation and propagation/routing , 2011 .

[2]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Linearity and nonlinearity of basin response as a function of scale: Discussion of alternative definitions , 2002 .

[3]  Patrick Le Goulven,et al.  Accounting for sparsely observed rainfall space—time variability in a rainfall—runoff model of a semiarid Tunisian basin/Prise en compte d'observations peu denses de la variabilité spatiotemporelle de la pluie dans une modélisation pluie—débit d'un bassin semi-aride Tunisien , 2005 .

[4]  P. Naden.  Spatial variability in flood estimation for large catchments: the exploitation of channel network structure , 1992 .

[5]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Catchment residence and travel time distributions: The master equation , 2011 .

[6]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  A geomorphoclimatic theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph , 1982 .

[7]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  On the impact of rainfall patterns on the hydrologic response , 2008 .

[8]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  The History of the Cluster Heat Map , 2009 .

[9]  N. Tauveron,et al.  River routing at the continental scale: use of globally-available data and an a priori method of parameter estimation , 1999 .

[10]  S. Grimaldi,et al.  A parsimonious geomorphological unit hydrograph for rainfall–runoff modelling in small ungauged basins , 2012 .

[11]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Scale effect on geomorphologic and kinematic dispersion , 2003 .

[12]  L. Band.  Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models , 1986 .

[13]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  Runoff generation and hydrologic response via channel network geomorphology — Recent progress and open problems , 1988 .

[14]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial moments of catchment rainfall: rainfall spatial organisation, basin morphology, and flood response , 2011 .

[15]  J. Fairfield,et al.  Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models , 1991 .

[16]  Victor Koren,et al.  Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data , 2004 .

[17]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments , 1995 .

[18]  P. Matgen,et al.  Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement , 2008 .

[19]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Can One Gauge the Shape of a Basin , 1995 .

[20]  Alessandro Marani,et al.  Basin scale model of solute transport , 1987 .

[21]  Keith Beven,et al.  Catchment travel time distributions and water flow in soils , 2011 .

[22]  Christophe Cudennec,et al.  Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins through geomorphology-based hydrograph transposition , 2015 .

[23]  M. Sivapalan.  Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: is there a connection? , 2003 .

[24]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[25]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  On the Relative Role of Hillslope and Network Geometry in Hydrologic Response , 1986 .

[26]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  On geomorphological dispersion in natural catchments and the geomorphological unit hydrograph , 1994 .

[27]  Giacomo Bertoldi,et al.  The geomorphic structure of the runoff peak , 2011 .

[28]  M. Kirkby.  Tests of the random network model, and its application to basin hydrology , 1976 .

[29]  Michael Lehning,et al.  Thermodynamics in the hydrologic response: Travel time formulation and application to Alpine catchments , 2015 .

[30]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  A synthesis of space‐time variability in storm response: Rainfall, runoff generation, and routing , 1999 .

[31]  C. O. Clark.  Storage and the Unit Hydrograph , 1945 .

[32]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[33]  M. J. Hall,et al.  Regional analysis using the Geomorphoclimatic Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph , 2001 .

[34]  J. Dooge.  A general theory of the unit hydrograph , 1959 .

[35]  C. T. Wang,et al.  A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology , 1980 .

[36]  A. J. Niemi,et al.  Residence time distributions of variable flow processes , 1977 .

[37]  Ian Pattison,et al.  The role of tributary relative timing and sequencing in controlling large floods , 2014 .

[38]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  Geomorphoclimatic estimation of extreme flow probabilities , 1983 .

[39]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Transport in the hydrologic response: Travel time distributions, soil moisture dynamics, and the old water paradox , 2010 .

[40]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  A rainfall‐runoff analysis of the geomorphologic IUH , 1979 .

[41]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Kinematic dispersion in stream networks 2. Scale issues and self‐similar network organization , 2002 .

[42]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling , 2006 .

[43]  Herbert H. Kimball.  Solar and Sky Radiation Measurements during March, 1927 , 1927 .

[44]  Christophe Cudennec,et al.  A geomorphological explanation of the unit hydrograph concept , 2004 .

[45]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Flow time estimation with spatially variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins , 2010 .

[46]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGICAL THEORY OF THE HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE , 1996 .

[47]  V. Gupta,et al.  A geomorphologic synthesis of nonlinearity in surface runoff , 1981 .

[48]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Kinematic dispersion in stream networks 1. Coupling hydraulic and network geometry , 2002 .

[49]  R. Bras,et al.  Incorporating hillslope effects into the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph , 1990 .

[50]  Keith Beven,et al.  How old is streamwater? Open questions in catchment transit time conceptualization, modelling and analysis , 2010 .

[51]  R. Rigon,et al.  Hillslope and channel contributions to the hydrologic response , 2003 .