Crowd-sourcing archaeological research: HeritageTogether digital public archaeology in practice

Archaeologists are increasingly working with crowd-sourced digital data. Using evidence from other disciplines about the nature of crowd-sourcing in academic research, we suggest that archaeological projects using donated data can usefully be differentiated between generative projects (which rely on data collected by citizen scientists), and analytical projects (which make use of volunteers to classify, or otherwise analyse data that are provided by the project). We conclude that projects which privilege hyper-local research (such as surveying specific sites) might experience tension if the audience they are appealing to are 'cyber local'. In turn, for more 'traditional' archaeological audiences (when the primary motivating interests may be the tangible, physical nature of portable material culture or the archaeological site itself), then intangible, digital simulacra may not provide an effective medium through which to undertake digital public archaeology

[1]  S. Sontag.  On Photography , 2017, Illuminations.

[2]  S. Thornham,et al.  On “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” , 2015 .

[3]  L. Richardson.  Understanding Archaeological Authority in a Digital Context , 2014 .

[4]  David P. Anderson,et al.  Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation? , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Alan D. Schrift,et al.  Discipline and Punish , 2013 .

[6]  C. Mcdavid,et al.  The Oxford handbook of public archaeology , 2012 .

[7]  Colleen Morgan,et al.  Emancipatory Digital Archaeology , 2012 .

[8]  Chiara Bonacchi.  Archaeology and Digital Communication. Towards Strategies of Public Engagement , 2012 .

[9]  Michel Foucoult.  Discipline and Punish , 2012 .

[10]  A. Gopher,et al.  Sitting on the tailing piles: creating extraction landscapes in Middle Pleistocene quarry complexes in the Levant , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Timothy Webmoor,et al.  Are Digital Picturings Representations? , 2010, EVA.

[13]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. , 2009, 0909.2925.

[14]  Steve Burrow,et al.  Bryn Celli Ddu Passage Tomb, Anglesey: Alignment, Construction, Date, and Ritual , 2010, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

[15]  J. Silvertown.  A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  J. Cohn.  Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? , 2008 .

[17]  R. Wallis,et al.  Sacred sites--contested rites/rights , 2007 .

[18]  Masuhiro Kogoma.  総論;総論;Introduction , 2006 .

[19]  C. Holtorf.  Beyond crusades: how (not) to engage with alternative archaeologies , 2005 .

[20]  Akira Matsuda,et al.  The Concept of ‘the Public’ and the Aims of Public Archaeology , 2004 .

[21]  C. Mcdavid,et al.  TOWARDS A MORE DEMOCRATIC ARCHAEOLOGY? : The Internet and public archaeological practice , 2004 .

[22]  A. Whittle,et al.  Places of Special Virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic landscapes of Wales , 2004 .

[23]  Tim Schadla-Hall,et al.  The comforts of unreason: The importance and relevance of alternative archaeology , 2004 .

[24]  Yvonne Marshall,et al.  What is community archaeology? , 2002 .

[25]  Neil Faulkner,et al.  Archaeology from below , 2000 .

[26]  Tim Schadla-Hall,et al.  Editorial: Public Archaeology , 1999, European Journal of Archaeology.

[27]  M. Shanks,et al.  The Craft of Archaeology , 1996, American Antiquity.

[28]  T. Greenslade.  The camera lucida , 1989 .