Selective Targeting of Human Alloresponsive CD8+ Effector Memory T Cells Based on CD2 Expression

Costimulation blockade (CoB), specifically CD28/B7 inhibition with belatacept, is an emerging clinical replacement for calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression in allotransplantation. However, there is accumulating evidence that belatacept incompletely controls alloreactive T cells that lose CD28 expression during terminal differentiation. We have recently shown that the CD2‐specific fusion protein alefacept controls costimulation blockade‐resistant allograft rejection in nonhuman primates. Here, we have investigated the relationship between human alloreactive T cells, costimulation blockade sensitivity and CD2 expression to determine whether these findings warrant potential clinical translation. Using polychromatic flow cytometry, we found that CD8+ effector memory T cells are distinctly high CD2 and low CD28 expressors. Alloresponsive CD8+CD2hiCD28− T cells contained the highest proportion of cells with polyfunctional cytokine (IFNγ, TNF and IL‐2) and cytotoxic effector molecule (CD107a and granzyme B) expression capability. Treatment with belatacept in vitro incompletely attenuated allospecific proliferation, but alefacept inhibited belatacept‐resistant proliferation. These results suggest that highly alloreactive effector T cells exert their late stage functions without reliance on ongoing CD28/B7 costimulation. Their high CD2 expression increases their susceptibility to alefacept. These studies combined with in vivo nonhuman primate data provide a rationale for translation of an immunosuppression regimen pairing alefacept and belatacept to human renal transplantation.

[1]  L. Rostaing,et al.  A Phase III Study of Belatacept‐based Immunosuppression Regimens versus Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study) , 2010, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[2]  C. Macedo,et al.  Contribution of Naïve and Memory T‐Cell Populations to the Human Alloimmune Response , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  Christian P. Larsen,et al.  Primary outcomes from a randomized, Phase III study of belatacept vs cyclosporine in ECD kidney transplants (BENEFIT-EXT Study) , 2009 .

[4]  L. Rostaing,et al.  Primary Outcomes from a Randomized, Phase III Study of Belatacept vs Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study) , 2009 .

[5]  D. McGavern,et al.  Therapeutic Memory T Cells Require Costimulation for Effective Clearance of a Persistent Viral Infection , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[6]  D. Speiser,et al.  Dominant Human CD8 T Cell Clonotypes Persist Simultaneously as Memory and Effector Cells in Memory Phase1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  T. McCormick,et al.  Alefacept in the treatment of psoriasis. , 2008, Clinics in dermatology.

[8]  A. Menter,et al.  Safety and efficacy of alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept and infliximab in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2008, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  A. Valujskikh,et al.  Donor‐Reactive CD8 Memory T Cells Infiltrate Cardiac Allografts Within 24‐h Posttransplant in Naive Recipients , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[10]  A. Kirk,et al.  A Critical Precursor Frequency of Donor-Reactive CD4+ T Cell Help Is Required for CD8+ T Cell-Mediated CD28/CD154-Independent Rejection1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  Y. Zhai,et al.  Defective Alloreactive CD8 T Cell Function and Memory Response in Allograft Recipients in the Absence of CD4 Help1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  K. Wittkowski,et al.  Alefacept (anti-CD2) causes a selective reduction in circulating effector memory T cells (Tem) and relative preservation of central memory T cells (Tcm) in psoriasis , 2007, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[13]  H. Robinson,et al.  Multiple-Cytokine-Producing Antiviral CD4 T Cells Are Functionally Superior to Single-Cytokine-Producing Cells , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[14]  Pedro Romero,et al.  Four Functionally Distinct Populations of Human Effector-Memory CD8+ T Lymphocytes1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  S. Nadler,et al.  Control of Memory CD4 T Cell Recall by the CD28/B7 Costimulatory Pathway1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[16]  K. Wood,et al.  The Impact of Memory T Cells on Rejection and the Induction of Tolerance , 2006, Transplantation.

[17]  G. Pantaleo,et al.  Functional signatures of protective antiviral T‐cell immunity in human virus infections , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[18]  A. Kirk,et al.  Human Monocytes as Intermediaries between Allogeneic Endothelial Cells and Allospecific T Cells: A Role for Direct Scavenger Receptor-Mediated Endothelial Membrane Uptake in the Initiation of Alloimmunity1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  V. Dharnidharka Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Philip F Halloran,et al.  Expression of CTL Associated Transcripts Precedes the Development of Tubulitis in T‐Cell Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[21]  P. Linsley,et al.  Rational Development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a High‐Affinity Variant of CTLA4‐Ig with Potent Immunosuppressive Properties , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[22]  A. Kirk,et al.  Immunocompetent T‐Cells with a Memory‐Like Phenotype are the Dominant Cell Type Following Antibody‐Mediated T‐Cell Depletion , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[23]  K. Wittkowski,et al.  Alefacept reduces infiltrating T cells, activated dendritic cells, and inflammatory genes in psoriasis vulgaris. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  C. Larsen,et al.  Heterologous immunity: an overlooked barrier to tolerance , 2003, Immunological reviews.

[25]  R. Koup,et al.  Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[26]  E. Reinherz,et al.  CD2 engagement induces dendritic cell activation: implications for immune surveillance and T-cell activation. , 2003, Blood.

[27]  E. Wherry,et al.  Heterologous immunity provides a potent barrier to transplantation tolerance. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  Hao Shen,et al.  Requirement for CD4 T Cell Help in Generating Functional CD8 T Cell Memory , 2003, Science.

[29]  A. Menter,et al.  Repeat courses of intravenous alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis provide consistent safety and efficacy , 2003, International journal of dermatology.

[30]  Urs Christen,et al.  CD4+ T cells are required for secondary expansion and memory in CD8+ T lymphocytes , 2003, Nature.

[31]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Cutting Edge: Persistent Viral Infection Prevents Tolerance Induction and Escapes Immune Control Following CD28/CD40 Blockade-Based Regimen1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[32]  A. Valujskikh,et al.  T Cells Primed by Leishmania major Infection Cross-React with Alloantigens and Alter the Course of Allograft Rejection1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  A. Valujskikh,et al.  Primed Allospecific T Cells Prevent the Effects of Costimulatory Blockade on Prolonged Cardiac Allograft Survival in Mice , 2002, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[34]  C. Pitcher,et al.  Development and Homeostasis of T Cell Memory in Rhesus Macaque1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  J. Altman,et al.  Role of CD28-B7 Interactions in Generation and Maintenance of CD8 T Cell Memory , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[36]  G. Krueger,et al.  Treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis by selective targeting of memory effector T lymphocytes. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. , 2000, Science.

[38]  A. Abbas,et al.  Functional Responses and Costimulator Dependence of Memory CD4+ T Cells1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[39]  J. Whitton,et al.  Activated and Memory CD8+ T Cells Can Be Distinguished by Their Cytokine Profiles and Phenotypic Markers1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[40]  C. Larsen,et al.  Asialo GM1(+) CD8(+) T cells play a critical role in costimulation blockade-resistant allograft rejection. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[41]  P. Merwe,et al.  A Subtle Role for Cd2 in T Cell Antigen Recognition , 1999 .

[42]  P. A. van der Merwe A Subtle Role for Cd2 in T Cell Antigen Recognition , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[44]  N. Greenspan,et al.  Pretransplant frequency of donor-specific, IFN-gamma-producing lymphocytes is a manifestation of immunologic memory and correlates with the risk of posttransplant rejection episodes. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[45]  H. Eisen,et al.  Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  R. Kedl,et al.  Qualitative differences between naive and memory T cells make a major contribution to the more rapid and efficient memory CD8+ T cell response. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[47]  H. Gudmundsdottir,et al.  Following the fate of individual T cells throughout activation and clonal expansion. Signals from T cell receptor and CD28 differentially regulate the induction and duration of a proliferative response. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[48]  H. Umehara,et al.  Involvement of protein tyrosine kinase p72syk and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in CD2-mediated granular exocytosis in the natural killer cell line, NK3.3. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[49]  J. Ritz,et al.  CD2‐CD58 Interaction and the Control of T‐Cell Interleukin‐12 Responsiveness , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  P. Linsley,et al.  Long-term acceptance of skin and cardiac allografts after blocking CD40 and CD28 pathways , 1996, Nature.

[51]  P. Linsley,et al.  CTLA4-Ig plus bone marrow induces long-term allograft survival and donor specific unresponsiveness in the murine model. Evidence for hematopoietic chimerism. , 1996, Transplantation.

[52]  P. Henkart Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity: two pathways and multiple effector molecules. , 1994, Immunity.

[53]  D. Kioussis,et al.  Mechanism of lymphocyte function-associated molecule 3-Ig fusion proteins inhibition of T cell responses. Structure/function analysis in vitro and in human CD2 transgenic mice. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[54]  S. Bixler,et al.  Specific interaction of lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3 with CD2 can inhibit T cell responses , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[55]  P. Beverley,et al.  Phenotypic changes associated with activation of CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T cells. , 1990, Immunology.

[56]  E. Reinherz,et al.  The Structural Biology of CD2 , 1989, Immunological reviews.

[57]  E. Reinherz,et al.  CD2-mediated adhesion facilitates T lymphocyte antigen recognition function , 1989, Nature.

[58]  T. Springer,et al.  Human memory T lymphocytes express increased levels of three cell adhesion molecules (LFA-3, CD2, and LFA-1) and three other molecules (UCHL1, CDw29, and Pgp-1) and have enhanced IFN-gamma production. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[59]  A. Whitty,et al.  Low affinity binding of an LFA-3/IgG1 fusion protein to CD2+ T cells is independent of cell activation. , 1999, Cell adhesion and communication.

[60]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  The lymphocyte function-associated LFA-1, CD2, and LFA-3 molecules: cell adhesion receptors of the immune system. , 1987, Annual review of immunology.