Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks

Abstract Recent evidence suggests that for highly transient information, instructional animations only provide a learning benefit compared to static presentations for object manipulation tasks. This study continued the research into animation–static comparisons by investigating whether showing static pictures of hands would have a positive impact on the non-manipulative tasks of memorizing arrays of abstract symbols. University students were randomly assigned to conditions according to 2 (hands: no-hands vs. with-hands) × 2 (presentation: statics vs. animation) factorial designs. The level of transient information was manipulated across experiments by increasing the number of symbols from 9 in Experiment 1 to 12 in Experiment 2. Results showed that for the most transient task the static presentation was superior to the animated format. Most importantly, significant interactions revealed that the effectiveness of static presentations was enhanced by showing the static hands, whereas the effectiveness of animations was reduced by showing these hands.

[1]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[2]  Nadine Marcus,et al.  The Transient Information Effect: Investigating the Impact of Segmentation on Spoken and Written text , 2012 .

[3]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension , 2013 .

[4]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[5]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Autumn B. Hostetter,et al.  When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[8]  Anna Wong,et al.  Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  D. Geary,et al.  Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition. Implications for mathematical development and instruction. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[13]  James D. Klein,et al.  The effect of audio and animation in multimedia instruction , 2004 .

[14]  J. Brockmole,et al.  The hands shield attention from visual interference , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[15]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[17]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[18]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research , 2008 .

[20]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns , 2012 .

[21]  John Sweller,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations , 2009 .

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[24]  Ronald W. Spangenberg,et al.  The motion variable in procedural learning , 1973 .

[25]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective , 2011 .

[26]  D. Geary Principles of evolutionary educational psychology , 2002 .

[27]  Volkmar Glauche,et al.  The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca’s area: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  Fred Paas,et al.  Dynamic Visualisations and Motor Skills , 2014, Handbook of Human Centric Visualization.

[29]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[30]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[31]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[32]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[33]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Interaction With Partially Transparent Hands And Objects , 2005, AUIC.

[34]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning : Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles , 2005 .

[35]  F. Paas,et al.  An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks , 2012 .

[36]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Learning a procedural task: effectiveness of multimedia presentations , 2000 .

[38]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[39]  John Sweller,et al.  The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[40]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Improved change detection with nearby hands , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[42]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  The World Within Reach , 2013 .

[43]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[45]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. , 2011 .

[46]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  Educating the evolved mind : conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology , 2007 .

[49]  J. Sweller,et al.  Natural Information Processing Systems , 2006 .

[50]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[51]  Shaun P Vecera,et al.  Attention Affects Visual Perceptual Processing Near the Hand , 2010, Psychological science.

[52]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Gestures in Instructional Animations: A Helping Hand to Understanding Non-human Movements? , 2013 .

[53]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  S. Cochin,et al.  Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[55]  Fred Paas,et al.  Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach , 2007 .

[56]  A. Glenberg What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  Ruth N. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Paul Ayres,et al.  Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[60]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  F. Paas,et al.  Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective , 2007 .