The use of enzymes for beer brewing : Thermodynamic comparison on resource use

The exergetic performance of beer produced by the conventional malting and brewing process is compared with that of beer produced using an enzyme-assisted process. The aim is to estimate if the use of an exogenous enzyme formulation reduces the environmental impact of the overall brewing process. The exergy efficiency of malting was 77%. The main exergy losses stem from the use of natural gas for kilning and from starch loss during germination. The exergy efficiency of the enzyme production process ranges between 20% and 42% depending on if the by-product was considered useful. The main exergy loss was due to high power requirement for fermentation. The total exergy input in the enzyme production process was 30 times the standard chemical exergy of the enzyme, which makes it exergetically expensive. Nevertheless, the total exergy input for the production of 100 kg beer was larger for the conventional process (441 MJ) than for the enzyme-assisted process (354 MJ). Moreover, beer produced using enzymes reduced the use of water, raw materials and natural gas by 7%, 14% and 78% respectively. Consequently, the exergy loss in the enzyme production process is compensated by the prevention of exergy loss in the total beer brewing process.

[1]  Jalel Labidi,et al.  Pinch and exergy based thermosolar integration in a dairy process , 2013 .

[2]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Environmental analysis of beer production , 2005 .

[3]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[4]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Potential of lees from wine, beer and cider manufacturing as a source of economic nutrients: An overview. , 2015, Waste management.

[5]  S. Aliyu,et al.  Brewer’s spent grain: A review of its potentials and applications , 2011 .

[6]  F. K. Zisopoulos,et al.  The use of exergetic indicators in the food industry – A review , 2017, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[7]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Chemical exergies of the elements , 1989 .

[8]  Mustafa Özilgen,et al.  Energy and exergy utilization, and carbon dioxide emission in vegetable oil production , 2011 .

[9]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact , 2008 .

[10]  W. Jakoby,et al.  Glycerol as an enzyme-stabilizing agent: effects on aldehyde dehydrogenase. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Sustainability assessment of salmonid feed using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Jan Szargut,et al.  International progress in second law analysis , 1980 .

[13]  Alessio Cimini,et al.  Carbon footprint of a pale lager packed in different formats: assessment and sensitivity analysis based on transparent data , 2016 .

[14]  F Baganz,et al.  Quantification of power consumption and oxygen transfer characteristics of a stirred miniature bioreactor for predictive fermentation scale‐up , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Exergy driven process synthesis for isoflavone recovery from okara , 2014 .

[16]  P. Harris,et al.  Directed evolution of a maltogenic alpha-amylase from Bacillus sp. TS-25. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  Geoffrey S. Simate,et al.  Water treatment and reuse in breweries , 2015 .

[18]  Laura H.G. van Donkelaar,et al.  Pearling barley to alter the composition of the raw material before brewing , 2015 .

[19]  Gigliola Spadoni,et al.  LCA of an Italian lager beer , 2008 .

[20]  Hedzer J. van der Kooi,et al.  Exergy analysis : a tool to study the sustainability of food supply chains , 2006 .

[21]  Krist V Gernaey,et al.  Modeling enzyme production with Aspergillus oryzae in pilot scale vessels with different agitation, aeration, and agitator types , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Mortaza Aghbashlo,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of the spray drying process of fish oil microencapsulation , 2012 .

[23]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Importance of exergy for analysis, improvement, design, and assessment , 2013 .

[24]  Pascalle J.M. Pelgrom,et al.  Sustainability assessment of oilseed fractionation processes: A case study on lupin seeds , 2015 .

[25]  T. Kunz,et al.  The influence of unmalted barley on the oxidative stability of wort and beer , 2012 .

[26]  A. Koutoulis,et al.  The Influence of Malt Quality on Malt Brewing and Barley Quality on Barley Brewing with Ondea Pro, Compared by Small-Scale Analysis1 , 2014 .

[27]  T. Becker,et al.  Comparison of beer quality attributes between beers brewed with 100% barley malt and 100% barley raw material. , 2012, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[28]  Filippos K. Zisopoulos,et al.  Exergetic comparison of food waste valorization in industrial bread production , 2015 .

[29]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Cradle-to-gate environmental assessment of enzyme products produced industrially in denmark by novozymes A/S , 2007 .

[30]  Abass A. Olajire,et al.  The brewing industry and environmental challenges , 2012 .

[31]  M. Çakmakci,et al.  Electricity generating capacity and performance deterioration of a microbial fuel cell fed with beer brewery wastewater. , 2014, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[32]  E. Arendt,et al.  Mashing with Unmalted Barley—Impact of Malted Barley and Commercial Enzyme (Bacillus spp.) Additions , 2005 .