Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice

BackgroundThe methodology of medical ethics during the last few decades has shifted from a predominant use of normative-philosophical analyses to an increasing involvement of empirical methods. The articles which have been published in the course of this so-called 'empirical turn' can be divided into conceptual accounts of empirical-normative collaboration and studies which use socio-empirical methods to investigate ethically relevant issues in concrete social contexts.DiscussionA considered reference to normative research questions can be expected from good quality empirical research in medical ethics. However, a significant proportion of empirical studies currently published in medical ethics lacks such linkage between the empirical research and the normative analysis. In the first part of this paper, we will outline two typical shortcomings of empirical studies in medical ethics with regard to a link between normative questions and empirical data: (1) The complete lack of normative analysis, and (2) cryptonormativity and a missing account with regard to the relationship between 'is' and 'ought' statements. Subsequently, two selected concepts of empirical-normative collaboration will be presented and how these concepts may contribute to improve the linkage between normative and empirical aspects of empirical research in medical ethics will be demonstrated. Based on our analysis, as well as our own practical experience with empirical research in medical ethics, we conclude with a sketch of concrete suggestions for the conduct of empirical research in medical ethics.SummaryHigh quality empirical research in medical ethics is in need of a considered reference to normative analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate how conceptual approaches of empirical-normative collaboration can enhance empirical research in medical ethics with regard to the link between empirical research and normative analysis.

[1]  L. Frith Symbiotic Empirical Ethics: A Practical Methodology , 2012, Bioethics.

[2]  Pascal Borry,et al.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[3]  T. Nilstun,et al.  Surveys on attitudes to active euthanasia and the difficulty of drawing normative conclusions , 2000, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[4]  D. Wendler,et al.  The relevance of empirical research in bioethics. , 2005, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[5]  Pascal Borry,et al.  Nobody Tosses a Dwarf! The Relation between the Empirical and the Normative Reexamined , 2009, Bioethics.

[6]  D. Birnbacher Ethics and Social Science: Which Kind of Co-operation? , 1999 .

[7]  W. Eward,et al.  Attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide among physicians in Vermont , 2007, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[8]  S. Salloch,et al.  Morality and moral conflicts in hospice care: results of a qualitative interview study , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[9]  Anne M. Stiggelbout,et al.  Scientific Contribution. Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[10]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  Empirical ethics in psychiatry , 2008 .

[11]  J. Schildmann,et al.  End-of-life practices in palliative care: a cross sectional survey of physician members of the German Society for Palliative Medicine , 2010, Palliative medicine.

[12]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  Inter‐Ethics: Towards an Interactive and Interdependent Bioethics , 2010, Bioethics.

[13]  P. Borry,et al.  The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. , 2005, Bioethics.

[14]  D. Strech,et al.  Evidence-based ethics – What it should be and what it shouldn't , 2008, BMC medical ethics.

[15]  S. Hurst What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics’? , 2010, Bioethics.

[16]  Tony Hope,et al.  The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics , 2008 .

[17]  M. Düwell Wofür braucht die Medizinethik empirische Methoden? , 2009, Ethik in der Medizin.

[18]  A. Galinier,et al.  French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[19]  B. Pedersen,et al.  Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine , 2007, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[20]  B. Gordijn,et al.  Empirical Ethics and its Alleged Meta-Ethical Fallacies , 2009, Bioethics.

[21]  J. Schildmann,et al.  [Treatment decisions in advanced cancer. An empirical-ethical study on physicians' criteria and the process of decision making]. , 2010, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[22]  B. Molewijk Integrated empirical ethics: In search for clarifying identities , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[23]  B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen,et al.  Physicians’ labelling of end-of-life practices: a hypothetical case study , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[24]  J. Solbakk Use and abuse of empirical knowledge in contemporary bioethics , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[25]  H. Abu‐Saad,et al.  Dutch Nurses' Attitudes Towards Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide , 2008, Nursing ethics.