The Influence of Sediments, Lithosphere and Upper Mantle (Anelastic) With Lateral Heterogeneity on Ocean Tide Loading and Ocean Tide Dynamics

Ocean tide loading (OTL) and ocean tide dynamics (OTD) are known to be affected by Earth's internal structures, with the latter being affected by the self‐attraction and loading (SAL) potential. Combining the 3D earth models Lyon and LITHO1.0, we construct a hybrid model to quantify the coupled effect of sediments, oceanic and continental lithosphere, and anelastic upper mantle on OTL and OTD. Compared to PREM, this more realistic 3D model produces significantly larger vertical OTL displacement by up to 3.9, 2.6, and 0.1 mm for the M2, K1, and Mf OTL, respectively. Moreover, it shows a smaller vector difference of 0.1 mm and a smaller amplitude difference of 0.2 mm than PREM with OTL observations at 663 Global Navigation Satellite System stations, a confirmation of the cumulative effect due to these earth features. On the other hand, we find a resonant impact of wider extent and larger magnitude on OTD, especially for the M2 and K1 tides. Specifically, this impact is concentrated in the ranges 0–6 mm and 0–1.5 mm for M2 and K1, respectively, which is considerably larger than the impact on SAL (mostly in the ranges 0–2 mm and 0–1.0 mm, respectively). Since the effect on vertical displacement is at a similar level compared to the accuracy of modern data‐constrained ocean tide models that require correction of the geocentric tide by loading induced vertical displacements, we regard its consideration to be potentially beneficial in OTD modeling.

[1]  H. Dobslaw,et al.  Self-attraction and loading feedback on ocean dynamics in both shallow water equations and primitive equations , 2021, Ocean Modelling.

[2]  V. Klemann,et al.  Glacial‐Isostatic Adjustment Models Using Geodynamically Constrained 3D Earth Structures , 2021, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[3]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Anelasticity and Lateral Heterogeneities in Earth's Upper Mantle: Impact on Surface Displacements, Self‐Attraction and Loading, and Ocean Tide Dynamics , 2021 .

[4]  H. Katori,et al.  Exploring potential applications of optical lattice clocks in a plate subduction zone , 2021, Journal of Geodesy.

[5]  Damien J. Allain,et al.  FES2014 global ocean tide atlas: design and performance , 2021 .

[6]  M. Thomas,et al.  High‐Resolution Numerical Modeling of Barotropic Global Ocean Tides for Satellite Gravimetry , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[7]  Z. Martinec,et al.  WINTERC-G: mapping the upper mantle thermochemical heterogeneity from coupled geophysical–petrological inversion of seismic waveforms, heat flow, surface elevation and gravity satellite data , 2021, Geophysical Journal International.

[8]  T. Bodin,et al.  Seismic evidence for partial melt below tectonic plates , 2020, Nature.

[9]  Matt A. King,et al.  Limitations in One‐Dimensional (an)Elastic Earth Models for Explaining GPS‐Observed M2 Ocean Tide Loading Displacements in New Zealand , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[10]  A. Aitken,et al.  Thermal and Compositional Anomalies of the Australian Upper Mantle From Seismic and Gravity Data , 2020, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[11]  E. Ivins,et al.  A linear viscoelasticity for decadal to centennial time scale mantle deformation , 2020, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[12]  M. Simons,et al.  A comparison of predicted and observed ocean tidal loading in Alaska , 2020, Geophysical Journal International.

[13]  P. Clarke,et al.  Asthenospheric anelasticity effects on ocean tide loading around the East China Sea observed with GPS , 2020, Solid Earth.

[14]  Juan Carlos Afonso,et al.  A global reference model of the lithosphere and upper mantle from joint inversion and analysis of multiple data sets , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[15]  W. Mooney,et al.  3‐D Density, Thermal, and Compositional Model of the Antarctic Lithosphere and Implications for Its Evolution , 2019, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[16]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Surface Loading of a Self-Gravitating, Laterally Heterogeneous Elastic Sphere: Preliminary Result for the 2D Case , 2019, IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy.

[17]  M. Schindelegger,et al.  Can We Model the Effect of Observed Sea Level Rise on Tides? , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[18]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  Inferring global upper-mantle shear attenuation structure by waveform tomography using the spectral element method , 2018 .

[19]  M. Bevis,et al.  Accurate computation of the elastic load Love numbers to high spectral degree for a finely layered, transversely isotropic and self-gravitating Earth , 2017 .

[20]  Y. Takei Effects of Partial Melting on Seismic Velocity and Attenuation: A New Insight from Experiments , 2017 .

[21]  N. Al-Arifi,et al.  3D density model of the upper mantle of Asia based on inversion of gravity and seismic tomography data , 2016 .

[22]  Yasuko Takei,et al.  Polycrystal anelasticity at near‐solidus temperatures , 2016 .

[23]  S. Owen,et al.  Observations of ocean tidal load response in South America from subdaily GPS positions , 2016 .

[24]  L. Rivera,et al.  of Geophysical Research : Solid Earth The sensitivity of surface mass loading displacement response to perturbations in the elastic structure of the crust andmantle , 2016 .

[25]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Ocean tide loading displacements in western Europe: 2. GPS‐observed anelastic dispersion in the asthenosphere , 2015 .

[26]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Ocean tide loading displacements in western Europe: 1. Validation of kinematic GPS estimates , 2015 .

[27]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Applying local Green's functions to study the influence of the crustal structure on hydrological loading displacements , 2015 .

[28]  Y. Ricard,et al.  Attenuation tomography of the upper mantle , 2014 .

[29]  W. Mooney,et al.  NACr14: A 3D model for the crustal structure of the North American Continent , 2014 .

[30]  Gary D. Egbert,et al.  Accuracy assessment of global barotropic ocean tide models , 2014 .

[31]  Y. Takei,et al.  Temperature, grain size, and chemical controls on polycrystal anelasticity over a broad frequency range extending into the seismic range , 2014 .

[32]  P. Woodworth,et al.  Sea-Level Science: Understanding Tides, Surges, Tsunamis and Mean Sea-Level Changes , 2014 .

[33]  G. Leitchenkov,et al.  Global sediment thickness data set updated for the Australian‐Antarctic Southern Ocean , 2013 .

[34]  S. Lebedev,et al.  Global shear speed structure of the upper mantle and transition zone , 2013 .

[35]  Adrian V. Dalca,et al.  On postglacial sea level—III. Incorporating sediment redistribution , 2013, Geophysical Journal International.

[36]  G. Masters,et al.  Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust , 2013 .

[37]  G. Masters,et al.  LITHO1.0 - An Updated Crust and Lithospheric Model of the Earth Developed Using Multiple Data Constraints , 2012 .

[38]  L. Jia,et al.  Load Love numbers and Green's functions for elastic Earth models PREM, iasp91, ak135, and modified models with refined crustal structure from Crust 2.0 , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[39]  I. Artemieva,et al.  THE LITHOSPHERE : An interdisciplinary approach , 2011 .

[40]  S. Cloetingh,et al.  An integrated gravity model for Europe's crust and upper mantle , 2010 .

[41]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Glacial isostasy and plate motion , 2008 .

[42]  J. Sündermann,et al.  Broad frequency tidal dynamics simulated by a high-resolution global ocean tide model forced by ephemerides , 2008 .

[43]  Bogdan Kustowski,et al.  The Shear-Wave Velocity Structure in the Upper Mantle beneath Eurasia , 2008 .

[44]  Malte Müller Synthesis of forced oscillations, Part I: Tidal dynamics and the influence of the loading and self-attraction effect , 2008 .

[45]  John B. Anderson,et al.  Sea-level history of the Gulf of Mexico since the Last Glacial Maximum with implications for the melting history of the Laurentide Ice Sheet , 2007 .

[46]  S. Desai,et al.  Constraints on mantle anelasticity from geodetic observations, and implications for the J2 anomaly , 2006 .

[47]  J. Gerald,et al.  Shear wave attenuation and dispersion in melt-bearing olivine polycrystals: 1. Specimen fabrication , 2004 .

[48]  J. Gerald,et al.  Grain-size-sensitive seismic wave attenuation in polycrystalline olivine , 2002 .

[49]  Z. Martinec Spectral–finite element approach to three‐dimensional viscoelastic relaxation in a spherical earth , 2000 .

[50]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[51]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[52]  R. Ray Ocean self‐attraction and loading in numerical tidal models , 1998 .

[53]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[54]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Catalogue HW95 on the tide generating potential , 1995 .

[55]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[56]  Kirk S. Hansen,et al.  Normal Modes of the World Ocean. Part II: Description of Modes in the Period Range 8 to 80 Hours , 1981 .

[57]  E. W. Schwiderski,et al.  On charting global ocean tides , 1980 .

[58]  Don L. Anderson,et al.  The frequency dependence of Q in the Earth and implications for mantle rheology and Chandler wobble , 1979 .

[59]  C. Pekeris A derivation of Laplace’s tidal equation from the theory of inertial oscillations , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[60]  W. Farrell Deformation of the Earth by surface loads , 1972 .