Strategies for local authorities to achieve the EU 2020 50% recycling, reuse and composting target: A case study of England

Abstract The revised Waste Framework Directive requires EU Member States to recycle 50% of their household waste by 2020. This study of 48 English authorities from five regions, between 2008/09 and 2012/13, analysed whether the national 50% target was likely to be achieved by 2020 and also investigated the main barriers and possible solutions for local authorities to attain 50% recycling. This study identified that England is unlikely to meet the EU target to reuse, recycle and compost 50% of its household waste by 2020. Key issues included central Government support and guidance, and difference in collection systems by high and low rate local authorities. Key recommendations including structural changes to the collection service including alternate weekly collection for dry recyclate and garden waste with a separate weekly collection of food waste, are suggested. Discussion on suggested amendments to the system of measurement are also included.

[1]  I D Williams,et al.  The impact of alternate weekly collections on waste arisings. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Shasikanta Nandeibam,et al.  Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK , 2011 .

[3]  Adam D. Read,et al.  Recycling behaviour in a London Borough: Results from large-scale household surveys , 2005 .

[4]  Darren Perrin,et al.  Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes , 2001 .

[5]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study , 2006 .

[6]  Christine Thomas,et al.  Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: A review of social norms and recycling , 2013 .

[7]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Managing municipal solid waste , 2001 .

[8]  E. Bomberg,et al.  Policy learning in an enlarged European Union: environmental NGOs and new policy instruments , 2007 .

[9]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: Development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy , 2005 .

[10]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Effective implementation of a marketing communications strategy for kerbside recycling: a case study from Rushcliffe, UK , 2004 .

[11]  Richard J. H. Smith,et al.  European household waste management schemes: Their effectiveness and applicability in England , 2007 .

[12]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality , 2002 .

[13]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling , 2004 .

[14]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change , 2008 .

[15]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Inconsistent pathways of household waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[16]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. , 2008, Waste management.

[17]  Travis P. Wagner,et al.  Examining recycling container attributes and household recycling practices , 2013 .

[18]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Charging for domestic waste in England: Combining environmental and equity considerations , 2010 .

[19]  Peter J. Shaw,et al.  Quantitative analysis of recyclable materials composition: Tools to support decision making in kerbside recycling , 2006 .