Mobile health solutions: An opportunity for rehabilitation in low- and middle income countries?

Mobile health (mHealth) development has advanced rapidly, indicating promise as an effective patient intervention. mHealth has many potential benefits that could help the treatment of patients, and the development of rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). mHealth is a low-cost option that does not need rapid access to healthcare clinics or employees. It increases the feasibility and rationality of clinical treatment expectations in comparison to the conventional clinical model of management by promoting patient adherence to the treatment plan. mHealth can also serve as a basis for formulating treatment plans and partially compensate for the shortcomings of the traditional model. In addition, mHealth can help achieve universal rehabilitation service coverage by overcoming geographical barriers, thereby increasing the number of ways patients can benefit from the rehabilitation service, and by providing rehabilitation to individuals in remote areas and communities with insufficient healthcare services. However, despite these positive potential aspects, there is currently only a very limited number of studies performed in LMICs using mHealth. In this study, we first reviewed the current evidence supporting the use of mHealth in rehabilitation to identify the countries where studies have been carried out. Then, we identify the current limitations of the implementation of such mHealth solutions and propose a 10-point action plan, focusing on the macro (e.g., policymakers), meso (e.g., technology and healthcare institutions), and micro (e.g., patients and relatives) levels to ease the use, validation, and implementation in LMICs and thus participate in the development and recognition of public health and rehabilitation in these countries.

[1]  P. Feys,et al.  Mobile health applications for improving physical function, physical activity, and quality of life in stroke survivors: a systematic review , 2022, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Moutzouri,et al.  How effective is a blended web-based rehabilitation for improving pain, physical activity, and knee function of patients with knee osteoarthritis? Study protocol for a randomized control trial , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  F. Cuenca‐Martínez,et al.  Behavior Modification Techniques on Patients with Chronic Pain in the Context of COVID-19 Telerehabilitation: An Umbrella Review , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  N. Nighoghossian,et al.  Co-design and evaluation of a patient-centred transition programme for stroke patients, combining case management and access to an internet information platform: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - NAVISTROKE , 2022, BMC Health Services Research.

[5]  M. Kirkevold,et al.  Organization of Rehabilitation Services in Randomized Controlled Trials: Which Factors Influence Functional Outcome? A Systematic Review , 2022, Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation.

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries’ approaches , 2022, npj Digital Medicine.

[7]  J. Balikuddembe,et al.  Impact of community-based rehabilitation on the physical functioning and activity of daily living of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  B. Bonnechère Evaluation of Processing Speed of Different Cognitive Functions Across the Life Span Using Cognitive Mobile Games. , 2022, Games for health journal.

[9]  H. McKay,et al.  How central support built capacity to deliver a health-promoting intervention for older adults in Canada. , 2020, Health & social care in the community.

[10]  R. Arena,et al.  Precision Medicine and Physical Therapy: A Healthy Living Medicine Approach for the Next Century. , 2021, Physical therapy.

[11]  P. Feys,et al.  Is mHealth a Useful Tool for Self-Assessment and Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review , 2021, Brain sciences.

[12]  A. Cieza,et al.  Development of the WHO STARS: A Tool for the Systematic Assessment of Rehabilitation Situation , 2021, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Heine,et al.  Unravelling ‘low-resource settings’: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis , 2021, BMJ Global Health.

[14]  Z. Kassam,et al.  Clinical research mentorship programme (CRMP) for radiation oncology residents in Africa—building capacity through mentoring , 2021, Ecancermedicalscience.

[15]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures , 2021, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  K. Grimmer,et al.  Collaborative capacity development to complement stroke rehabilitation in Africa , 2021 .

[17]  S. Burns,et al.  mHealth Intervention Applications for Adults Living With the Effects of Stroke: A Scoping Review , 2020, Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation.

[18]  T. Vos,et al.  Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 , 2020, The Lancet.

[19]  N. Chavannes,et al.  eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Physical Therapy.

[21]  J. Middleton,et al.  Development and Validation of the WHO Rehabilitation Competency Framework: A Mixed Methods Study , 2020, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Enabling precision rehabilitation interventions using wearable sensors and machine learning to track motor recovery , 2020, npj Digital Medicine.

[23]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders , 2020, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  A. Cieza Rehabilitation the Health Strategy of the 21st Century, Really? , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  S. Carlsson,et al.  Sustainability of ‘mHealth’ interventions in sub- Saharan Africa: a stakeholder analysis of an electronic community case management project in Malawi , 2019, Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi.

[26]  Melanie Cohn,et al.  Origins Matter: Culture Impacts Cognitive Testing in Parkinson’s Disease , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  G. Ooms,et al.  The right to health: from citizen's right to human right (and back). , 2019, Public health.

[28]  N. Pitchford,et al.  Interactive apps prevent gender discrepancies in early‐grade mathematics in a low‐income country in sub‐Sahara Africa , 2019, Developmental science.

[29]  R. Mitchell,et al.  A study of macro-, meso- and micro-barriers and enablers affecting extended scopes of practice: the case of rural nurse practitioners in Australia , 2019, BMC Nursing.

[30]  Thomas C. Riley,et al.  Things Are Changing so Fast , 2018, The Gerontologist.

[31]  Bernadine Brady,et al.  A MIXED-METHODS STUDY , 2019 .

[32]  A. Nieuwboer,et al.  Towards Personalized Rehabilitation for Gait Impairments in Parkinson’s Disease , 2018, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[33]  Adam Landman,et al.  Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed? , 2018, JAMA.

[34]  M. Ramsay,et al.  The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries , 2018, BMC medical education.

[35]  P. O'brien,et al.  Role of North-South Partnership in Trauma Management: Uganda Sustainable Trauma Orthopaedic Program , 2018, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[36]  Tianyou Xu,et al.  Application of telehealth intervention in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[37]  K. Tham,et al.  A feasibility study of a mobile phone supported family-centred ADL intervention, F@ce™, after stroke in Uganda , 2018, Globalization and Health.

[38]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US) , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[39]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[40]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[41]  Gerold Stucki,et al.  Rehabilitation: The health strategy of the 21st century. , 2018, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[42]  Stephen H. Bell,et al.  A ?scoping review. , 2018, Sexual health.

[43]  N. Dragano,et al.  Micro, macro, but what about meso? The institutional context of health inequalities , 2018, International Journal of Public Health.

[44]  D. Jamison,et al.  Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 9): Improving Health and Reducing Poverty , 2017 .

[45]  Elizabeth J. Paulsen,et al.  Implementation strategies for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[46]  B. Jansen,et al.  Suitability of functional evaluation embedded in serious game rehabilitation exercises to assess motor development across lifespan. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[47]  E. Krug,et al.  Strengthening health systems to provide rehabilitation services , 2017, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[48]  John W. Scott,et al.  Non‐technical skills and health care provision in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review , 2016, Medical education.

[49]  B. Kirkwood,et al.  Mobile Health (mHealth) Approaches and Lessons for Increased Performance and Retention of Community Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[51]  P. Leffers,et al.  An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2009 .

[52]  S. Hinohara Health Strategy in the 21st Century. , 1994 .

[53]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[54]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[55]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .