Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence.

PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) water-excitation true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) in the assessment of cartilage abnormalities of the knee, by using surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the hospital institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-nine patients (30 knees) with a mean age of 56 years (range, 18-86 years) were prospectively evaluated with a sagittal 3D true FISP magnetic resonance (MR) sequence. The mean interval between MR imaging and surgery was 1 day (range, 0-9 days). During surgery, the articular surfaces of the knee were evaluated by using a modified Noyes score. The MR images were evaluated by two blinded readers on two separate occasions. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by setting the cutoff for abnormality between grade 1 (intact cartilage surface) and grade 2 (cartilage defects). Statistical methods used included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, with 95% confidence intervals (Wilson score method) and calculation of kappa values with standard errors. RESULTS Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the two readers and the two evaluations ranged from 56% to 66%, 78% to 93%, and 71% to 75%, respectively. Interobserver agreement was substantial for both the first (kappa = 0.73) and the second (kappa = 0.65) evaluation. Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect (kappa = 0.84) for reader 1 and moderate (kappa = 0.60) for reader 2. CONCLUSION The 3D water-excitation true FISP MR sequence allows assessment of the articular cartilage of the knee with moderate-to-high specificity and low-to-moderate sensitivity.

[1]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Magnetization preparation during the steady state: Fat‐saturated 3D TrueFISP , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Rapid musculoskeletal MRI with phase-sensitive steady-state free precession: comparison with routine knee MRI. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[6]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Sonin,et al.  Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  E. Dumont,et al.  Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology--ROC analysis in an experimental model. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  Gerhard Laub,et al.  TrueFISP--technical considerations and cardiovascular applications. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[12]  W. F. Conway,et al.  Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Radiology.

[13]  J Romero,et al.  MRI of patellar articular cartilage: Evaluation of an optimized gradient‐echo sequence (3D‐DESS) , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  S. Vasanawala,et al.  Controversies in protocol selection in the imaging of articular cartilage. , 2005, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[16]  Kathryn Stevens,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: Comparison between fat‐suppressed three‐dimensional SPGR imaging, fat‐suppressed FSE imaging, and fat‐suppressed three‐dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques , 2003, European Radiology.

[18]  D G Disler,et al.  Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J. Debatin,et al.  Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  D. W. Jackson,et al.  Cartilage Substitutes: Overview of Basic Science and Treatment Options , 2001, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[21]  M. Modic,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: assessment with MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[22]  J. Peyron Epidemiological aspects of osteoarthritis. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[23]  P. Babyn,et al.  Osteoarthritis staging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, gross pathology and histopathology in the rhesus macaque. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[24]  Kathryn Stevens,et al.  Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial‐spectral spoiled gradient‐echo vs. fat‐suppressed 3D spoiled gradient–echo MR imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  M. Ladd,et al.  Whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging featuring moving table continuous data acquisition with high‐precision position feedback , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  H. Potter,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[27]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  Michael P Recht,et al.  MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  C. Cooper,et al.  EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis , 2001 .

[30]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[31]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  Evaluation of chondromalacia of the patellofemoral compartment with axial magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[32]  Norbert J Pelc,et al.  Rapid MR imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Christian W A Pfirrmann,et al.  Imaging of patellar cartilage with a 2D multiple-echo data image combination sequence. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  J. Szumowski,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: fat-suppressed MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[35]  D G Nishimura,et al.  Fluctuating equilibrium MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.