Frequency of adverse systemic reactions after fluorescein angiography. Results of a prospective study.

Intravenous fluorescein angiography is a commonly performed and extraordinarily valuable diagnostic procedure. The frequency of adverse reactions after angiography has varied considerably in previous reports. In a prospective study of 2789 angiographic procedures in 2025 patients, the authors found that the percentage of adverse reactions depended strongly on the patient's angiographic history. Overall, adverse reactions followed 4.8% of the angiographic procedures. These reactions included nausea (2.9%), vomiting (1.2%), flushing/itching/hives (0.5%), and other reactions (dyspnea, syncope, excessive sneezing) (0.2%). No cases of anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, or seizures occurred. The percentage of reactions was 1.8% for patients who had had previous angiography without ever having had an adverse reaction. In contrast, the percentage of reactions was 48.6% for patients who had had an adverse reaction to angiography previously.

[1]  V. Balu,et al.  Cardiac arrest following fluorescein angiography. , 1979, JAMA.

[2]  R. E. Brown,et al.  Metoclopramide as prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting induced by fluorescein. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  R. Wesley,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction after fluorescein angiography. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  C. W. Parker,et al.  Reactions following intravenous fluorescein. , 1971, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  H. Schatz.  Sloughing of skin following fluorescein extravasation. , 1978, Annals of ophthalmology.

[6]  H. Novotny,et al.  A Method of Photographing Fluorescence in Circulating Blood in the Human Retina , 1961, Circulation.

[7]  R. Royall.  Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators , 1986 .

[8]  R. I. Pacurariu,et al.  Acute pulmonary edema following intravenous fluorescein angiography. , 1976, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  L. Yannuzzi,et al.  Effective differences in the formulation of intravenous fluorescein and related side effects. , 1974, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  P. Ellis,et al.  Antihistamines as prophylaxis against side reactions to intravenous fluorescein. , 1980, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[11]  D. Marcus,et al.  Adverse reactions during intravenous fluorescein angiography. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  F. Leach,et al.  Convulsion following intravenous fluorescein angiography. , 1989, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Butner,et al.  Adverse reactions in intravenous fluorescein angiography. , 1983, Annals of ophthalmology.

[14]  E. K. Chung,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction following fluorescein angiography. , 1977, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[15]  Mcallister Rg.  Hypertensive crisis and myocardial infarction after fluorescein angiography. , 1981 .

[16]  B. I. Chazan,et al.  Untoward effects of fluorescein retinal angiography in diabetic patients. , 1971, Annals of ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Justice,et al.  Clinical Comparison of 10% and 25% Intravenous Sodium Fluorescein Solutions , 1977 .

[18]  Pacurariu Ri.  Low incidence of side effects following intravenous fluorescein angiography. , 1982, Annals of ophthalmology.

[19]  J. S. Madowitz,et al.  Severe anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. Recurrences despites premedication with diphenhydramine and prednisone. , 1979, JAMA.

[20]  R S Sobel,et al.  Fluorescein angiography complication survey. , 1986, Ophthalmology.