The global tree restoration potential

The potential for global forest cover The restoration of forested land at a global scale could help capture atmospheric carbon and mitigate climate change. Bastin et al. used direct measurements of forest cover to generate a model of forest restoration potential across the globe (see the Perspective by Chazdon and Brancalion). Their spatially explicit maps show how much additional tree cover could exist outside of existing forests and agricultural and urban land. Ecosystems could support an additional 0.9 billion hectares of continuous forest. This would represent a greater than 25% increase in forested area, including more than 200 gigatonnes of additional carbon at maturity.Such a change has the potential to store an equivalent of 25% of the current atmospheric carbon pool. Science, this issue p. 76; see also p. 24 There is room on the planet for an extra 0.9 billion hectares of tree cover, supporting 517 billion trees and storing 205 Gt of carbon. The restoration of trees remains among the most effective strategies for climate change mitigation. We mapped the global potential tree coverage to show that 4.4 billion hectares of canopy cover could exist under the current climate. Excluding existing trees and agricultural and urban areas, we found that there is room for an extra 0.9 billion hectares of canopy cover, which could store 205 gigatonnes of carbon in areas that would naturally support woodlands and forests. This highlights global tree restoration as one of the most effective carbon drawdown solutions to date. However, climate change will alter this potential tree coverage. We estimate that if we cannot deviate from the current trajectory, the global potential canopy cover may shrink by ~223 million hectares by 2050, with the vast majority of losses occurring in the tropics. Our results highlight the opportunity of climate change mitigation through global tree restoration but also the urgent need for action.

[1]  睦代 門平,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) , 2002, International Organizations and the Law of the Sea 2001.

[2]  José J. San José,et al.  Productivity and carbon fluxes of tropical savannas , 2006 .

[3]  W. Erdelen United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) , 2019, The Grants Register 2020.

[4]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[5]  Andy Jarvis,et al.  Downscaling Global Circulation Model Outputs: The Delta Method Decision and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 1 , 2010 .

[6]  C. Jones,et al.  The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations , 2011 .

[7]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[8]  S. Levin,et al.  The Global Extent and Determinants of Savanna and Forest as Alternative Biome States , 2011, Science.

[9]  Olivier Arino,et al.  Global Land Cover Map for 2009 (GlobCover 2009) , 2012 .

[10]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[11]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research , 2013 .

[12]  Rick Mueller,et al.  Mapping global cropland and field size , 2015, Global change biology.

[13]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[14]  Marvin N. Wright,et al.  SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Alan Grainger,et al.  The extent of forest in dryland biomes , 2017, Science.

[17]  Stephen E. Fick,et al.  WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas , 2017 .

[18]  Kendall R. Jones,et al.  One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure , 2018, Science.

[19]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land change from 1982 to 2016 , 2018, Nature.

[20]  H. Haberl,et al.  Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass , 2017, Nature.

[21]  S. Lewis,et al.  Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon , 2019, Nature.

[22]  D. Coomes,et al.  Limited capacity of tree growth to mitigate the global greenhouse effect under predicted warming , 2019, Nature Communications.

[23]  Author Correction: Narrow bounds for the quantum capacity of thermal attenuators , 2019, Nature Communications.