Genomic Alterations Associated with Estrogen Receptor Pathway Activity in Metastatic Breast Cancer Have a Differential Impact on Downstream ER Signaling

Mutations in the estrogen receptor gene (ESR1), its transcriptional regulators, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are enriched in patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we integrated whole genome sequencing with RNA sequencing data from the same samples of 101 ER-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients who underwent a tumor biopsy prior to the start of a new line of treatment for MBC (CPCT-02 study, NCT01855477) to analyze the downstream effects of DNA alterations previously linked to endocrine resistance, thereby gaining a better understanding of the associated mechanisms. Hierarchical clustering was performed using expression of ESR1 target genes. Genomic alterations at the DNA level, gene expression levels, and last administered therapy were compared between the identified clusters. Hierarchical clustering revealed two distinct clusters, one of which was characterized by increased expression of ESR1 and its target genes. Samples in this cluster were significantly enriched for mutations in ESR1 and amplifications in FGFR1 and TSPYL. Patients in the other cluster showed relatively lower expression levels of ESR1 and its target genes, comparable to ER-negative samples, and more often received endocrine therapy as their last treatment before biopsy. Genes in the MAPK-pathway, including NF1, and ESR1 transcriptional regulators were evenly distributed. In conclusion, RNA sequencing identified a subgroup of patients with clear expression of ESR1 and its downstream targets, probably still benefiting from ER-targeting agents. The lower ER expression in the other subgroup might be partially explained by ER activity still being blocked by recently administered endocrine treatment, indicating that biopsy timing relative to endocrine treatment needs to be considered when interpreting transcriptomic data.

[1]  R. Greil,et al.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Breast Cancer Primaries and Matched Metastases in AURORA, the Breast International Group (BIG) Molecular Screening Initiative , 2021, Cancer discovery.

[2]  C. Caldas,et al.  FGFR1 amplification or overexpression and hormonal resistance in luminal breast cancer: rationale for a triple blockade of ER, CDK4/6, and FGFR1 , 2021, Breast cancer research : BCR.

[3]  D. Chan,et al.  Neurofibromin Is an Estrogen Receptor-α Transcriptional Co-repressor in Breast Cancer. , 2020, Cancer cell.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  S. Loi,et al.  Lucitanib for the Treatment of HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results from the Multicohort Phase II FINESSE Study , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies , 2019, Nature Genetics.

[7]  A. Iafrate,et al.  FGFR1 Amplification Mediates Endocrine Resistance but Retains TORC Sensitivity in Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive (HR+) Breast Cancer , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  R. Colomer,et al.  Nintedanib plus letrozole in early breast cancer: a phase 0/I pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety clinical trial of combined FGFR1 and aromatase inhibition , 2019, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  H. Rugo,et al.  Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Bertucci,et al.  Genomic characterization of metastatic breast cancers , 2019, Nature.

[11]  G. Greene,et al.  Next-Generation ER&agr; Inhibitors for Endocrine-Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer , 2019, Endocrinology.

[12]  I. Bièche,et al.  Abstract PD2-06: CirculatingESR1mutation detection rate and early decrease under first line aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib in the PADA-1 trial (UCBG-GINECO) , 2019, Poster Discussion Abstracts.

[13]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  A phase Ib dose allocation study of oral administration of lucitanib given in combination with fulvestrant in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and FGFR1-amplified or non-amplified metastatic breast cancer , 2019, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[14]  E. Sokol,et al.  Loss of function of NF1 is a mechanism of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in lobular breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  B. Taylor,et al.  The Genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancers. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[16]  N S El Saghir,et al.  4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)† , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  E. Winer,et al.  Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  Wigard P. Kloosterman,et al.  Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  F. Clatot,et al.  Circulating ESR1 mutations at the end of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment and after relapse in breast cancer patients , 2018, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  Ville Mustonen,et al.  The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer , 2018, Nature.

[21]  Jia Gu,et al.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor , 2018, bioRxiv.

[22]  Daniel F. Hayes,et al.  20‐Year Risks of Breast‐Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  E. Cuppen,et al.  MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes , 2017, bioRxiv.

[24]  M. Goetz,et al.  MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Cairo,et al.  Association of FGFR1 with ERα Maintains Ligand-Independent ER Transcription and Mediates Resistance to Estrogen Deprivation in ER+ Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  S. Chandarlapaty,et al.  Activating ESR1 Mutations Differentially Affect the Efficacy of ER Antagonists. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[27]  P. Neven,et al.  Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled study of dovitinib in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with HR+, HER2− breast cancer that had progressed during or after prior endocrine therapy , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.

[28]  M. Ellis,et al.  Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[29]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BOLERO-2 Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[31]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  G. Hampton,et al.  Heterogeneity and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving fulvestrant , 2016, Nature Communications.

[33]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[34]  J. Lewis-Wambi,et al.  Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: an overview of the proposed roles of noncoding RNA , 2015, Breast Cancer Research.

[35]  Edwin Cuppen,et al.  Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats , 2015, Bioinform..

[36]  A. van de Stolpe,et al.  Selection of personalized patient therapy through the use of knowledge-based computational models that identify tumor-driving signal transduction pathways , 2014 .

[37]  R. Yelensky,et al.  D538G mutation in estrogen receptor-α: A novel mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. , 2013, Cancer research.

[38]  David Chen,et al.  ESR1 ligand binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Javed Siddiqui,et al.  Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[41]  Erin E. Carlson,et al.  TSPYL5 SNPs: association with plasma estradiol concentrations and aromatase expression. , 2013, Molecular endocrinology.

[42]  J. Bergh,et al.  Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  A. Ashworth,et al.  FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[44]  Gianluca Bontempi,et al.  Biological Processes Associated with Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Depend on the Molecular Subtypes , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Alok J. Saldanha,et al.  Java Treeview - extensible visualization of microarray data , 2004, Bioinform..

[47]  S Miyano,et al.  Open source clustering software. , 2004, Bioinformatics.

[48]  Graham A Colditz,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  W. McGuire,et al.  Estrogen control of progesterone receptor in human breast cancer: role of estradiol and antiestrogen. , 1978, Endocrinology.

[50]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[51]  René Bernards,et al.  TSPYL5 suppresses p53 levels and function by physical interaction with USP7 , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[52]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[53]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.