Comparing the Impact of Energy Model Results on Life Cycle Energy: Focus on High Performance Residential Building

Studies have shown that design-phase energy models, such as those used in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) calculations, have significant error rates, sometimes as much as 50%. These same energy model results are also being utilized in the field of life cycle assessment (LCA), where energy model results are being input for electricity and energy inventory calculations for the entire life cycle of the building. Error rates in energy modeling results have been well documented; however, research is lacking on the effect of this uncertainty within LCA, specifically life cycle energy. This research analyzes energy modeling results in terms of building life cycle energy use and metered energy data with a case study of a Solar Decathlon House. The life cycle assessment results indicated that the impact of energy model results is dependent on the impact category. Life cycle energy, however, appeared to be dependent on the electricity, resulting in an average error rate of about 44%. The sensitivity study analyzed these discrepancies and produced results that reduced the life cycle energy error rate to 26%.

[1]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings , 2002 .

[2]  Na Wang,et al.  A marketable all-electric solar house: A report of a Solar Decathlon project , 2009 .

[3]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[4]  Mireya Navarro,et al.  Some Buildings Not Living Up to Green Label , 2009 .

[5]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[6]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[7]  Roberto Dones,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Energy Systems: Results for Current Systems in Switzerland and other UCTE Countries , 2007 .

[8]  Robert Ries,et al.  Estimating Construction Project Environmental Effects Using an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Model , 2008 .

[9]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life‐Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single‐Family House , 2000 .

[10]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Mathias Borg,et al.  A building sector related procedure to assess the relevance of the usage phase , 2003 .

[12]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[13]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life cycle assessment of residential heating and cooling systems in four regions in the United States , 2008 .

[14]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[15]  Cathy Turner,et al.  Green Building Performance Evaluation: Measured Results from LEED-New Construction Buildings , 2008 .

[16]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .

[17]  C. L. Saunders,et al.  Utilizing measured energy usage to analyze design phase energy models , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[18]  Robert Ries,et al.  Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes , 2006 .

[19]  Robert Ries,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[20]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Environmental Effects of an Office Building , 2003 .

[21]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Measured and predicted energy demand of a low energy building: important aspects when using Building Energy Simulation , 2007 .

[22]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[23]  Alberto Hernandez Neto,et al.  Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption , 2008 .