Possible Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Black Areas in Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction

Purpose: To investigate the possible risk factors and clinical effects of black areas in small-incision lenticule extraction. Methods: Thirty-one cases and 126 controls were enrolled in a case–control study from the database of a single center from September 2012 to July 2017. A retrospective analysis of surgical procedures with video and medical records was performed. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the possible risk factors for black areas between cases with black areas and controls without black areas. Results: In the study, 19 eyes (61.3%) with black areas were associated with the presence of surface debris, 10 of which had repeated suction during docking and centration (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the energy of the femtosecond laser used for the cases (133 ± 4.04 nJ) and controls (138 ± 3.26 nJ) (P < 0.001). The odds ratio for the energy of the laser was 0.180 (95% confidence interval, 0.099–0.328, P < 0.001). Eyes with black areas had poorer uncorrected vision at 1 and 7 days and 1 month postoperatively (0.06, 0.01, and 0.00 logMAR, respectively) compared with controls (−0.01, −0.07, and −0.05 logMAR, respectively) (P < 0.005). At month 3, the safety index was lower in the cases (1.14 ± 0.47) compared with controls (1.36 ± 0.28) (P = 0.003). The postoperative spherical equivalent in the cases was more myopic than in controls (P = 0.036), except for month 3 (P = 0.183). Conclusions: Black areas in small-incision lenticule extraction could be caused by repeated suction, presence of surface debris, and a lower energy of the femtosecond laser. These factors could result in rough dissection and slower recovery of visual acuity.

[1]  D. Reinstein,et al.  Lower Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Jiaonan Ma,et al.  Incidence and management of intraoperative complications during small-incision lenticule extraction in 3004 cases. , 2017, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Renato Garcia,et al.  Advances in femtosecond laser technology , 2016, Clinical ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Blum,et al.  Five-year results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE) , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  Manli Liu,et al.  Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  S. Ganesh,et al.  Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Corneal biomechanical effects: Small‐incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  W. Sekundo,et al.  One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE) , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Knorz,et al.  Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Yan Wang,et al.  [Clinical study of femtosecond laser corneal small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism]. , 2013, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Yan Wang,et al.  Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[13]  Florence Cabot,et al.  Applications of femtosecond lasers in ophthalmic surgery , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[14]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for Myopia. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  Dan Z Reinstein,et al.  Femtosecond laser technology in corneal refractive surgery: a review. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Small‐incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  C. Rapuano Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6month prospective study , 2012 .

[18]  R. Shah,et al.  Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All‐in‐one femtosecond laser refractive surgery , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  M. Blum,et al.  Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters , 2011, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Blum,et al.  Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  N. Çağıl,et al.  Effectiveness of laser‐assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  M. Azzolini,et al.  Effect of decreasing surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis on optical and functional outcomes. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[23]  J. G. Linn,et al.  The Effects of Glove Powders on the Eye , 1951 .