A research model of project complexity and goal commitment effects on project outcome

Essentially, performance evaluation is a human behavioural phenomenon involving a cognitive perceptual process. Project performance has two attributes, at least: (1) the individual's expected performance (manifested as assigned goals); and (2) the individual's perceived actual performance. Evaluation comprises the comparison of these two attributes. The present paper develops a research model for project outcome evaluation designed to examine the effects of the two moderators, goal commitment and project complexity, on the perceived project performance of project participants. It is postulated that: (1) there is a positive monotonic relationship between goal difficulty and performance, but that this is moderated by project complexity; (2) difficult goals lead to higher performance, but that this will happen only when the project participant is committed to the goal; and (3) the transferability of critical success factors to enhance/improve the performance of subsequent projects has to be examined and applied in the light of the effects of these two moderators on project performance.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[2]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance , 1984 .

[3]  Anthony Walker,et al.  Evaluation of project outcomes , 1998 .

[4]  Mark E. Tubbs,et al.  An empirical comparison of self-report and discrepancy measures of goal commitment , 1991 .

[5]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[6]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[7]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[8]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Maryland vs Michigan vs Minnesota: Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance , 1980 .

[9]  A. Zander,et al.  Choice of unattainable group goals and effects on performance , 1971 .

[10]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[11]  William D. Wilsted,et al.  Determinants of Aspiration Levels in a Simulated Goal Setting Environment of the Firm , 1974 .

[12]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[13]  J. Kotter.  The General Managers , 1982 .

[14]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction and performance , 1985 .

[15]  Mei-mai Anita. Liu,et al.  Evaluation of the outcome of construction projects , 1995 .

[16]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[17]  Lola L. Lopes.  Individual strategies in goal-setting☆ , 1976 .

[18]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Participative goal-setting: Social, motivational, and cognitive factors. , 1986 .

[19]  Miriam Erez,et al.  The Congruence of Goal-Setting Strategies With Socio-Cultural Values and its Effect on Performance , 1986 .

[20]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .