Articulatory effects on speech perception: a second report

Abstract: The effects of repeated articulation on speech perception were assessed to determine whether the production and perception of speech rely on the same processing mechanism. Subjects were asked to whisper an alternating sequence of syllables repetitively, in the absence of auditory feedback, and were then presented syllables to identify auditorily. In the first experiment, subjects uttered a sequence of the syllables [si]–[su] or [sti]–[stu] and then identified a series of seven synthetic speech syllables spanning the distinction between [si] and [sti]. These syllables varied from one another in the duration of silence preceding the vowel. A significant effect of perceptuo-motor adaptation was obtained for [sti]-[stu] but not [si]–[su] articulation. In Experiment II, the same test procedure was applied to another series of synthetic syllables, [ba]–[wa], differing from one another in the duration and rate of the first three formant transitions. A significant effect was obtained after repetitively uttering a sequence of [wa]–[ya] syllables but not after uttering a sequence of [ba]–[da]. In Experiment III, a category judgement response was required for the [ba]–[wa] stimuli, using the integers 1 through 7. A signal detectability analysis was applied to the results of this experiment and showed a significant perceptuo-motor effect after uttering a sequence of [ba]–[da] but not [wa]–[ya]. Finally, the category judgement task was used in Experiment IV with another series of syllables, [ba]–[pha], which differed from one another in voice-onset time. No significant effects of perceptuo-motor adaptation were obtained with the [ba]–[pha] series, and their absence was attributed to the absence of voice-onset time as a cue for distinguishing such syllables in whispered speech. The perceptuo-motor results are compared with the results obtained with a strictly perceptual adaptation paradigm.

[1]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Selective adaptation for acoustic cues of voicing in initial stops , 1974 .

[3]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Articulatory effects on speech perception: a preliminary report , 1975 .

[4]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Perceptuomotor adaptation to a speech feature , 1974 .

[5]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Perceptual Analysis of Stop Consonants and Glides. , 1976 .

[6]  A. Liberman,et al.  Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Intensity Perception. II. Resolution in One‐Interval Paradigms , 1972 .

[8]  H. Suzuki A Mutually Complementary Effect of the Rate and the Amount of Formant Transition in Distinguishing Vowel, Semivowel, and Stop Consonant , 1970 .

[9]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[10]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[11]  WILLIAM E. COOPER,et al.  Feature processing in the perception and production of speech , 1974, Nature.

[12]  R. Cole,et al.  Speech Perception and Production of the Consonant Cluster (st). , 1976 .

[13]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  P. Lieberman On the Origins of Language: An Introduction to the Evolution of Human Speech , 1988 .

[15]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1973 .

[16]  W. Cooper,et al.  Perceptuo-motor adaptation to speech: an analysis of bisyllabic utterances and a neural model. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.