Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and cessation.

We assessed the ability of a combined contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedure to promote and sustain temporary smoking cessation among 34 hired research volunteers, and the ability of a smoking reduction test to predict the subsequent initiation of abstinence. During the 5-day cutdown test, subjects were paid from $0 to $6 per day depending on the extent of reduction from baseline CO levels. During the abstinence test, breath samples were obtained three times daily and subjects were paid $4 for each CO reading less than or equal to 11 ppm. Sixty-eight percent of subjects initiated abstinence. Of the breath samples collected during the abstinence test (91% of scheduled samples), 96.5% were less than or equal to 11 ppm and 80.5% were less than or equal to 8 ppm. Subjects who earned more money during the cutdown test were more likely to abstain (r = -0.51, p less than .001). Contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedures appear to have usefulness for analog studies of smoking reduction and cessation.

[1]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Contingent reinforcement for carbon monoxide reduction: within-subject effects of pay amount. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Influence of nicotine on cardiovascular and hormonal effects of cigarette smoking , 1984, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Contingent payment for carbon monoxide reduction: Effects of pay amount , 1983 .

[4]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Cotinine disposition and effects , 1983, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  G. Koch,et al.  The influence of observing carbon monoxide level on cigarette smoking by public prenatal patients. , 1983, American Journal of Public Health.

[6]  D. Petitti,et al.  Accuracy of information on smoking habits provided on self-administered research questionnaires. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[7]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  Self-tracking of carbon monoxide levels by smokers* , 1980 .

[8]  S. Hulley,et al.  Expired air carbon monoxide and serum thiocyanate as objective measures of cigarette exposure. , 1977, American journal of public health.

[9]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Contingent reinforcement for reduced breath carbon monoxide levels: target-specific effects on cigarette smoking. , 1985, Addictive behaviors.

[10]  R. Bliss,et al.  Problems with thiocyanate as an index of smoking status: a critical review with suggestions for improving the usefulness of biochemical measures in smoking cessation research. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.