Encoding direction when interpreting proximal terms

The location of an object is often described by spatially relating it to a known landmark. The spatial terms used in such descriptions can provide various types of information. For example, projective terms such as above indicate direction but not distance, whereas proximal terms such as near indicate distance but not direction. Previous research has demonstrated that information not explicitly specified by projective prepositions (i.e., distance) is also encoded during the interpretation of these terms. Using a sentence-picture verification task, we examined whether direction is similarly encoded during the apprehension of proximal terms, examining both spatial prepositions (e.g., near) and motion verbs (e.g., approach). Results suggest that interpreting proximal terms involves encoding direction when such information facilitates locating the target.

[1]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations , 1996 .

[2]  Constanze Vorwerg,et al.  Use of Reference Directions in Spatial Encoding , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[3]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[4]  T. Matlock Fictive motion as cognitive simulation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Bowerman Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[6]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Interpreting Words in Spatial Descriptions , 1988 .

[7]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[8]  L. Carlson,et al.  The space in spatial language , 2004 .

[9]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[10]  S. Levinson Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[11]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Speaking of Motion: Verb Use in English and Spanish , 1998 .

[12]  T. Hubbard Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .

[14]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[15]  H. Pick,et al.  Spatial orientation : theory, research, and application , 1984 .

[16]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  How far is near? Inferring distance from spatial descriptions , 2005 .

[17]  D. Kemmerer “Near” and “far” in language and perception , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  B. Landau,et al.  Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language , 2005, Cognition.

[19]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[20]  G. Logan Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[22]  A. W. Melton,et al.  Coding Processes in Human Memory. , 1973 .

[23]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning , 2003 .