Pollution abatement and long-term growth

Abstract This paper examines, first, the conditions under which sustained economic growth and the preservation of environmental quality are compatible and optimal, and, second, in what way economic growth is affected by environmental policy. A general equilibrium one-sector model is developed in which the environment is essential for production and welfare. The growth rate is endogenously determined. Pollution occurs as an inevitable by-product of economic activity but can be reduced by spending a fraction of total output on abatement activities. Feasibility of long-term growth requires a critical level of substitution in production and productivity in abatement technology. Low-development traps may arise due to environmental constraints. Whether the optimal growth path implies sustainability depends on the rate of discount, and the rates of intratemporal and intertemporal substitution. Because producers fail to take into account the positive effect of private abatement activities on aggregate environmental quality and productivity, growth in the market economy may be either too low or too high. In the former case, environmental taxation boosts growth.

[1]  R. D'arge Essay On Economic Growth and Environmental Quality , 1971 .

[2]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  The conditions for achieving environmentally sustainable development , 1990 .

[3]  John C. V. Pezzey,et al.  Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Guide , 1992, Environmental Values.

[4]  R. Barro Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  R. Barro,et al.  Inflation and Economic Growth , 1995 .

[6]  S. Fischer,et al.  Lectures on Macroeconomics , 1972 .

[7]  R. Kollmann Hidden Unemployment: a Search Theoretic Interpretation , 1994 .

[8]  Deqin Cai,et al.  Constant-returns endogenous growth with pollution control , 1994 .

[9]  S. Rebelo,et al.  Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  R. Gradus,et al.  The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth—Pollution in three prototype growth models , 1993 .

[11]  J. A. Smulders,et al.  Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model , 1995 .

[12]  E. Keeler,et al.  The optimal control of pollution , 1972 .

[13]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[14]  Charles I. Plosser,et al.  Growth and Business Cycles I. The Basic Neoclassical Model , 1988 .

[15]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. , 1980 .

[16]  A. Bovenberg,et al.  Environmental quality and pollution-saving technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model , 1993 .

[17]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  S. Wijnbergen,et al.  Can abatement resolve the conflict between economic growth and the environment , 1995 .

[19]  B. A. Forster OPTIMAL CAPITAL ACCUMULATION IN A POLLUTED ENVIRONMENT , 1973 .

[20]  J. Krautkraemer Resource amenities and the preservation of natural environments , 1985 .

[21]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Optimal growth with renewable resources and pollution , 1991 .

[22]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  K. Blackburn,et al.  Endogenous Growth, Environment and R&D , 1994 .

[24]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  Lethal model 2: the limits to growth revisited. , 1992, Brookings papers on economic activity.

[25]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[26]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Economic growth, pollution, and renewable resources , 1993 .

[27]  J. Ligthart,et al.  Pollution, the cost of public funds and endogenous growth , 1994 .

[28]  S. Smulders,et al.  Entropy, environment, and endogenous economic growth , 1995 .