Pros and cons of peptide isolectric focusing in shotgun proteomics.

In shotgun proteomics, protein mixtures are proteolytically digested before tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis. Biological samples are generally characterized by a very high complexity, therefore a step of peptides fractionation before the MS analysis is essential. This passage reduces the sample complexity and increases its compatibility with the sampling performance of the instrument. Among all the existing approaches for peptide fractionation, isoelectric focusing has several peculiarities that are theoretically known but practically rarely exploited by the proteomics community. The main aim of this review is to draw the readers' attention to these unique qualities, which are not accessible with other common approaches, and that represent important tools to increase confidence in the identification of proteins and some post-translational modifications. The general characteristics of different methods to perform peptide isoelectric focusing with natural and artificial pH gradients, the existing instrumentation, and the informatics tools available for isoelectric point calculation are also critically described. Finally, we give some general conclusions on this strategy, underlying its principal limitations.

[1]  Thomas A Neubert,et al.  Identification of Phosphopeptides by MALDI Q-TOF MS in Positive and Negative Ion Modes after Methyl Esterification*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[2]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  The focusing positions of polypeptides in immobilized pH gradients can be predicted from their amino acid sequences , 1993, Electrophoresis.

[3]  J. Rush,et al.  Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Kevin S. Shores,et al.  Shotgun proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid using off-gel electrophoresis as the first-dimension separation. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  R. Lewensohn,et al.  Use of narrow‐range peptide IEF to improve detection of lung adenocarcinoma markers in plasma and pleural effusion , 2009, Proteomics.

[6]  Eugene A. Kapp,et al.  A proteome strategy for fractionating proteins and peptides using continuous free-flow electrophoresis coupled off-line to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  M. Falda,et al.  High confidence and sensitivity four-dimensional fractionation for human plasma proteome analysis , 2012, Amino Acids.

[8]  C. Schaefer,et al.  Direct ampholyte‐free liquid‐phase isoelectric peptide focusing: Application to the human serum proteome , 2004, Electrophoresis.

[9]  Alexander Scherl,et al.  Exploring glycopeptide-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a combined proteomics and transcriptomics approach for the identification of resistance-related markers , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[10]  C. Pace,et al.  Protein Ionizable Groups: pK Values and Their Contribution to Protein Stability and Solubility* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. Kasai,et al.  Accuracy in the determination of isoelectric points of some proteins and a peptide by capillary isoelectric focusing: utility of synthetic peptides as isoelectric point markers. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  T. Griffin,et al.  Evaluating preparative isoelectric focusing of complex peptide mixtures for tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics: a case study in profiling chromatin-enriched subcellular fractions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Analytical Chemistry.

[14]  B. Persson,et al.  Quantitative membrane proteomics applying narrow range peptide isoelectric focusing for studies of small cell lung cancer resistance mechanisms , 2008, Proteomics.

[15]  P. Roepstorff,et al.  Highly Selective Enrichment of Phosphorylated Peptides from Peptide Mixtures Using Titanium Dioxide Microcolumns* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  S. Lemeer,et al.  A versatile peptide pI calculator for phosphorylated and N‐terminal acetylated peptides experimentally tested using peptide isoelectric focusing , 2008, Proteomics.

[17]  B. Cargile,et al.  An alternative to tandem mass spectrometry: isoelectric point and accurate mass for the identification of peptides. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  A. Cifuentes,et al.  Mass distribution and focusing properties of carrier ampholytes for isoelectric focusing: I. Novel and unexpected results , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[19]  A. Cifuentes,et al.  Mass distribution, polydispersity and focusing properties of carrier ampholytes for IEF. III: pH 2.5–4 intervals , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[20]  Richard D. Hayes,et al.  Top-down, bottom-up, and side-to-side proteomics with virtual 2-D gels , 2005 .

[21]  G. Luo,et al.  Estimation of isoelectric points of human plasma proteins employing capillary isoelectric focusing and peptide isoelectric point markers , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[22]  J. Rossier,et al.  Two‐stage Off‐Gel™ isoelectric focusing: Protein followed by peptide fractionation and application to proteome analysis of human plasma , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[23]  F. Holsboer,et al.  Phosphopeptide enrichment by IEF , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in‐gel protein digestion for proteome analysis , 2008, Proteomics.

[25]  T. Griffin,et al.  Three-dimensional peptide fractionation for highly sensitive nanoscale LC-based shotgun proteomic analysis of complex protein mixtures. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  T. Griffin,et al.  Preparative peptide isoelectric focusing as a tool for improving the identification of lysine-acetylated peptides from complex mixtures. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  M. Mann,et al.  Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  D. Nesta,et al.  A method for routine analysis of recombinant immunoglobulins (rIgGs) by capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF). , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[29]  J. Yates,et al.  An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  P. Wright,et al.  Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 , 2005, Proteomics.

[31]  D. Desiderio,et al.  Proteome analysis using isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradient gels followed by mass spectrometry , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[32]  P. Pevzner,et al.  InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  R. Jungas,et al.  Best literature values for the pK of carbonic and phosphoric acid under physiological conditions. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[34]  Frédérique Lisacek,et al.  PICarver: a software tool and strategy for peptides isoelectric focusing. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[35]  Rong Zeng,et al.  High-sensitivity analysis of human plasma proteome by immobilized isoelectric focusing fractionation coupled to mass spectrometry identification. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  Shotgun proteomics: a qualitative approach applying isoelectric focusing on immobilized pH gradient and LC-MS/MS. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The Implications of Proteolytic Background for Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[38]  C. Lucy,et al.  Non-covalent capillary coatings for protein separations in capillary electrophoresis. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[39]  B. Cargile,et al.  A comparison of immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing and strong‐cation‐exchange chromatography as a first dimension in shotgun proteomics , 2005, Proteomics.

[40]  R. Hendrickson,et al.  Detection and validation of non-synonymous coding SNPs from orthogonal analysis of shotgun proteomics data. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[41]  B. Cargile,et al.  Gel based isoelectric focusing of peptides and the utility of isoelectric point in protein identification. , 2004, Journal of proteome research.

[42]  E Gianazza,et al.  Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. , 1982, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[43]  L. Zhang,et al.  Macroporous polyacrylamide‐based monolithic column with immobilized pH gradient for protein analysis , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[44]  John R Yates,et al.  Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[45]  Fredrik Levander,et al.  Critical comparison of multidimensional separation methods for increasing protein expression coverage. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[46]  Fanyu Meng,et al.  Whole genome searching with shotgun proteomic data: applications for genome annotation. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[47]  J. A. Thomas,et al.  S-nitrosylation and S-glutathiolation of protein sulfhydryls by S-nitroso glutathione. , 1999, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[48]  R. Appel,et al.  Popitam: Towards new heuristic strategies to improve protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data , 2003, Proteomics.

[49]  J. Lehtiö,et al.  iTRAQ compatibility of peptide immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing , 2007, Proteomics.

[50]  N. Dovichi,et al.  Capillary isoelectric focusing with pH 9.7 cathode for the analysis of gastric biopsies , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[51]  T. Kislinger,et al.  Peptide separations by on-line MudPIT compared to isoelectric focusing in an off-gel format: application to a membrane-enriched fraction from C2C12 mouse skeletal muscle cells. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[52]  M. Mann,et al.  Trypsin Cleaves Exclusively C-terminal to Arginine and Lysine Residues*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[53]  K. Kasai,et al.  Fluorescence-labeled peptide pI markers for capillary isoelectric focusing. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[54]  J. Eu,et al.  Calculation of the isoelectric point of tryptic peptides in the pH 3.5–4.5 range based on adjacent amino acid effects , 2008, Electrophoresis.

[55]  Marcus Svensson,et al.  Neuropeptidomics: MS applied to the discovery of novel peptides from the brain. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[56]  John R Yates,et al.  Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of the tumor necrosis factor pathway. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[57]  M. Lamoree,et al.  Use of microdialysis for the on-line coupling of capillary isoelectric focusing with electrospray mass spectrometry , 1997 .

[58]  Pier Giorgio Righetti,et al.  Carrier ampholytes for IEF, on their fortieth anniversary (1967–2007), brought to trial in court: The verdict , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[59]  S. Hoving,et al.  Isoelectric focusing and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. , 2009, Methods in enzymology.

[60]  B. Seshi,et al.  Immobilized pH gradient-driven paper-based IEF: a new method for fractionating complex peptide mixtures before MS analysis , 2011, Clinical Proteomics.

[61]  D. Tabb,et al.  Evaluation of strong cation exchange versus isoelectric focusing of peptides for multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[62]  B. Koshel,et al.  Trajectory of isoelectric focusing from gels to capillaries to immobilized gradients in capillaries , 2012, Proteomics.

[63]  Johan Lengqvist,et al.  Observed peptide pI and retention time shifts as a result of post-translational modifications in multidimensional separations using narrow-range IPG-IEF , 2011, Amino Acids.

[64]  Markus Müller,et al.  Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS , 2010, Proteomics.

[65]  Nikola S Mueller,et al.  Interrogation of MS/MS search data with an pI Filter algorithm to increase protein identification success , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[66]  Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al.  In-gel isoelectric focusing of peptides as a tool for improved protein identification. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[67]  Pengyuan Yang,et al.  Enhanced N-glycosylation site exploitation of sialoglycopeptides by peptide IPG-IEF assisted TiO2 chromatography , 2012, Glycoconjugate Journal.

[68]  T. Berkelman.  Removal of interfering substances in samples prepared for two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[69]  F. Foret,et al.  Autofocusing and ESI‐MS analysis of protein digests in a miniaturized multicompartment electrolyzer , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[70]  W. Lehmann,et al.  pI‐based phosphopeptide enrichment combined with nanoESI‐MS , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[71]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Optimized peptide separation and identification for mass spectrometry based proteomics via free-flow electrophoresis. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[72]  B. Balgley,et al.  Comprehensive yeast proteome analysis using a capillary isoelectric focusing‐based multidimensional separation platform coupled with ESI‐MS/MS , 2007, Proteomics.

[73]  Christine A. Miller,et al.  Efficient Fractionation and Improved Protein Identification by Peptide OFFGEL Electrophoresis*S , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[74]  P. Lescuyer,et al.  Imaging mass spectrometry using peptide isoelectric focusing. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[75]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The pros and cons of peptide-centric proteomics , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.