A Successful Predictive Model of Species Richness Based on Indicator Species

Abstract:  Because complete species inventories are expensive and time‐consuming, scientists and land managers seek techniques to alleviate logistic constraints on measuring species richness, especially over large spatial scales. We developed a method to identify indicators of species richness that is applicable to any taxonomic group or ecosystem. In an initial case study, we found that a model based on the occurrence of five indicator species explained 88% of the deviance of species richness of 56 butterflies in a mountain range in western North America. We validated model predictions and spatial transferability of the model using independent, newly collected data from another, nearby mountain range. Predicted and observed values of butterfly species richness were highly correlated with 93% of the observed values falling within the 95% credible intervals of the predictions. We used a Bayesian approach to update the initial model with both the model‐building and model‐validation data sets. In the updated model, the effectiveness of three of the five indicator species was similar, whereas the effectiveness of two species was reduced. The latter species had more erratic distributions in the validation data set than in the original model‐building data set. This objective method for identifying indicators of species richness could substantially enhance our ability to conduct large‐scale ecological assessments of any group of animals or plants in any geographic region and to make effective conservation decisions.

[1]  R. M. Nally Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[2]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Nestedness analysis and conservation planning: the importance of place, environment, and life history across taxonomic groups , 2002, Oecologia.

[3]  L. Bradford,et al.  The state of the planet. , 2002, Time.

[4]  A. Bennett,et al.  HOW WELL DO ECOSYSTEM-BASED PLANNING UNITS REPRESENT DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF BIODIVERSITY? , 2002 .

[5]  Virginia Gewin Ecosystem health: The state of the planet , 2002, Nature.

[6]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[7]  B. Söderström,et al.  Species‐Richness Correlations of Six Different Taxa in Swedish Seminatural Grasslands , 2002 .

[8]  M. Steininger,et al.  A Global Experiment Under Way , 2002, Science.

[9]  Fred Wells,et al.  Marine Biodiversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities for Tropical Reefs , 2002, Science.

[10]  Ralph Mac Nally,et al.  USING “INDICATOR” SPECIES TO MODEL SPECIES RICHNESS: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND PREDICTIONS , 2002 .

[11]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Species Occurrence Using Broad‐Scale Environmental Variables: an Example with Butterflies of the Great Basin , 2001 .

[12]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Can We Defy Nature's End? , 2001, Science.

[13]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[14]  James R. Miller,et al.  BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS AND HABITAT USE BY BIRDS IN A FRAGMENTED AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE , 2000 .

[15]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions : quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia , 2000 .

[16]  A. Bennett,et al.  Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia , 2000 .

[17]  S. Andelman,et al.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[19]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  A NEW METHOD FOR SELECTION OF UMBRELLA SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING , 2000 .

[21]  H. Mooney Worth more dead than alive , 2000, Nature.

[22]  L. Gustafsson Red-listed species and indicators: vascular plants in woodland key habitats and surrounding production forests in Sweden , 2000 .

[23]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  The BioRap Biodiversity Assessment and Planning Study for Papua New Guinea , 2000 .

[24]  J. Terborgh Requiem for Nature , 1999 .

[25]  E. Fleishman,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF RAPOPORT'S RULE: ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS IN MONTANE BUTTERFLY COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[26]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[27]  Charles T. Scott,et al.  SAMPLING METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CHANGE IN FOREST RESOURCES , 1998 .

[28]  R A Matthews Bayesian statistical methods: what, why--and when. , 1998, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[29]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[30]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  Factors influencing behavior and transferability of habitat models for a benthic stream fish , 1997 .

[31]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Natural History and Biogeography of the Butterflies of the Toiyabe Range, Nevada (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). , 1997 .

[32]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[33]  J. Michael Reed,et al.  Using Statistical Probability to Increase Confidence of Inferring Species Extinction , 1996 .

[34]  J. Asher,et al.  Butterfly monitoring 1 — recording the changes , 1995 .

[35]  C. Thomas,et al.  Butterfly Conservation Management , 1995 .

[36]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[37]  A. Pullin Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[38]  D. Pearson,et al.  Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[39]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[40]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Terrestrial Arthropod Assemblages: Their Use in Conservation Planning , 1993 .

[41]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[42]  Jorge SoberónM.,et al.  The Use of Species Accumulation Functions for the Prediction of Species Richness , 1993 .

[43]  M. Morris,et al.  Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation , 1993 .

[44]  C. Boggs,et al.  Mud puddling by butterflies is not a simple matter , 1991 .

[45]  R. Raguso The butterflies (Lepidoptera) of the Tuxtlas Mts., Veracruz, Mexico, revisited: species-richness and habitat disturbance , 1990, The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera.

[46]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A Critique , 1988 .

[47]  D. Murphy,et al.  Zoogeography of Great Basin butterflies: patterns of distribution and differentiation , 1987 .

[48]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[49]  King the state of the planet , 1980 .

[50]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[51]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[52]  P. Feeny,et al.  Sodium: Stimulus for Puddling Behavior by Tiger Swallowtail Butterflies, Papilio glaucus , 1974, Science.