Parametric Study of an Explosive-Driven Shock Tube as Blast Loading Tool

The need for efficient blast loading tools is increasing with the development of new protective techniques. Among these tools, one can cite the use of an explosive-driven shock tube (EDST). The purpose of the present study is to define analytical equations to predict incident and reflected pressure and impulse generated at a laboratory scale EDST end in terms of the tube length, the tube diameter, the explosive mass, and the stand-off distance. The formulae are obtained based on a dimensional analysis and a numerical parametric study. The analytical study is supported by a set of experiments, in order to validate the obtained analytical models. The EDSTs discussed in this study are open on both sides with diameters ranging from 0.15 to 0.50m and a length ranging from 0.75 to 3m. Two different tube sections, circular, and square, are examined. Explosive charges from 5 to 50 g of C4 are used. Within these conditions reflected pressures ranging from 0.15 to 11 MPa and reflected impulses ranging from 100 to 3000 Pa·s are obtained at the tube end. The obtained analytical equations are compared to several available results and formulae from the literature. In addition to that, a graphic representation is developed in order to estimate the tube geometry and the explosive mass necessary to generate a given couple of pressure–impulse at the tube end.

[1]  D. A. Freiwald,et al.  Approximate Blast Wave Theory and Experimental Data for Shock Trajectories in Linear Explosive‐Driven Shock Tubes , 1972 .

[2]  Gerald Nurick,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of tube-core claddings under blast loads , 2010 .

[3]  Ning,et al.  Influence of explosive density on small scale internal blast experiments , 2012 .

[4]  Neil Bourne,et al.  A 50 mm bore gas gun for dynamic loading of materials and structures , 2003 .

[5]  Amy C Courtney,et al.  Oxy-acetylene driven laboratory scale shock tubes for studying blast wave effects. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[6]  A. Courtney,et al.  Shock tube design for high intensity blast waves for laboratory testing of armor and combat materiel , 2014, 1501.07813.

[7]  Jingbo Liu,et al.  Analysis of blast wave propagation inside tunnel , 2008 .

[8]  Leonard E Schwer.  IS YOUR MESH REFINED ENOUGH ? Estimating Discretization Error using GCI , 2008 .

[9]  Hyonny Kim,et al.  A non-explosive test method for generating wide area dynamic blast-type pressure pulse loading on armored panels , 2014 .

[10]  R. Bauman,et al.  Blast overpressure in rats: recreating a battlefield injury in the laboratory. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Shock loading of three-dimensional woven composite materials , 2007 .

[12]  W. A. Martin.  A REVIEW OF SHOCK TUBES AND SHOCK TUNNELS , 1958 .

[13]  G. Nurick,et al.  The effect of stand-off distance on the failure of fully clamped circular mild steel plates subjected to blast loads , 2007 .

[14]  Genevieve Langdon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CONFINEMENT AND STAND-OFF DISTANCE IN BLAST TESTS , 2009 .

[15]  Todd P Slavik,et al.  A coupling of empirical explosive blast loads to ALE air domains in LS-DYNA® , 2010 .

[16]  Ronald Segars,et al.  A SHOCK TUBE FOR DOWNSELECTING MATERIAL CONCEPTS FOR BLAST PROTECTION PART I: DESCRIPTION OF THE SHOCK TUBE AND A COMPARISON OF FLUSH MOUNTED AND RECESS MOUNTED PRESSURE SENSORS , 2008 .

[17]  Dynamic axial crush response of circular cell honeycombs , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation. , 2005 .

[19]  S. Palanivelu.  Energy absorption of crushable tubes for protective structures under static, impact and blast loading , 2011 .

[20]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[21]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure , 2005 .

[22]  S. Son,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Blast Mitigation for Target Protection , 2014 .

[23]  Matthew David Alley,et al.  Explosive blast loading experiments for TBI scenarios: Characterization and mitigation , 2009 .

[24]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Shock loading response of sandwich panels with 3-D woven E-glass composite skins and stitched foam core , 2009 .