An inexpensive method for evaluating the localization performance of a mobile robot navigation system

We propose a method for evaluating the localization accuracy of an indoor navigation system in arbitrarily large environments. Instead of using externally mounted sensors, as required by most ground-truth systems, our approach involves mounting only landmarks consisting of distinct patterns printed on inexpensive foam boards. A pose estimation algorithm computes the pose of the robot with respect to the landmark using the image obtained by an on-board camera. We demonstrate that such an approach is capable of providing accurate estimates of a mobile robot's position and orientation with respect to the landmarks in arbitrarily-sized environments over arbitrarily-long trials. Furthermore, because the approach involves minimal outfitting of the environment, we show that only a small amount of setup time is needed to apply the method to a new environment. Experiments involving a state-of-the-art navigation system demonstrate the ability of the method to facilitate accurate localization measurements over arbitrarily long periods of time.

[1]  W. Burgard,et al.  RAWSEEDS: Robotics Advancement through Web-publishing of Sensorial and Elaborated Extensive Data Sets , 2010 .

[2]  Ulrich Rückert,et al.  Teletesting: Path planning experimentation and benchmarking in the Teleworkbench , 2013, 2013 European Conference on Mobile Robots.

[3]  Giulio Fontana,et al.  Rawseeds ground truth collection systems for indoor self-localization and mapping , 2009, Auton. Robots.

[4]  Winston Churchill,et al.  The New College Vision and Laser Data Set , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Luca Iocchi,et al.  RoboCup@Home: Scientific Competition and Benchmarking for Domestic Service Robots , 2009 .

[7]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Towards a benchmark for RGB-D SLAM evaluation , 2011, RSS 2011.

[8]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Neural Network-Based Face Detection , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A comparison of SLAM algorithms based on a graph of relations , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  Good Experimental Methodologies for Robotic Mapping: A Proposal , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Cyrill Stachniss,et al.  On measuring the accuracy of SLAM algorithms , 2009, Auton. Robots.

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Tim D. Barfoot,et al.  A self-calibrating 3D ground-truth localization system using retroreflective landmarks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Brian A. Weiss,et al.  Test arenas and performance metrics for urban search and rescue robots , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[16]  Jacky Baltes,et al.  A benchmark suite for mobile robots , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).