History Matching

In the probabilistic approach for history matching, the information from the dynamic data is merged with the prior geologic information in order to generate permeability models consistent with the observed dynamic data as well as the prior geology. The relationship between dynamic response data and reservoir attributes may vary in different regions of the reservoir due to spatial variations in reservoir attributes, fluid properties, well configuration, flow constrains on wells etc. This implies probabilistic approach should then update different regions of the reservoir in different ways. This necessitates delineation of multiple reservoir domains in order to increase the accuracy of the approach. The research focuses on a probabilistic approach to integrate dynamic data that ensures consistency between reservoir models developed from one stage to the next. The algorithm relies on efficient parameterization of the dynamic data integration problem and permits rapid assessment of the updated reservoir model at each stage. The report also outlines various domain decomposition schemes from the perspective of increasing the accuracy of probabilistic approach of history matching. Research progress in three important areas of the project are discussed: • Validation and testing the probabilistic approach to incorporating production data in reservoir models. • Development of a robust scheme for identifying reservoir regions that will result in a more robust parameterization of the history matching process. • Testing commercial simulators for parallel capability and development of a parallel algorithm for history matching.

[1]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Practical Use of Scale Up and Parallel Reservoir Simulation Technologies in Field Studies , 1997 .

[2]  Benoit Noetinger,et al.  Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Sequential Stochastic Simulations , 2001 .

[3]  P. A. Swaby,et al.  Combining Geostatistical Modelling With Gradient Information for History Matching: The Pilot Point Method , 1997 .

[4]  Robert Bissell,et al.  Calculating Optimal Parameters for History Matching , 1994 .

[5]  M. L. Wasserman,et al.  A New Algorithm for Automatic History Matching , 1974 .

[6]  R. W. Schulze-Riegert,et al.  Combined Global and Local Optimization Techniques Applied to History Matching , 2003 .

[7]  Olivier Gosselin,et al.  Use of Prior Information in Gradient-Based History-Matching , 2001 .

[8]  T. Kashib,et al.  Iterative Updating of Reservoir Models Constrained to Dynamic Data , 2002 .

[9]  Steven L. Bryant,et al.  Integrating Dynamic Data in Reservoir Models Using a Parallel Computational Approach , 2004 .

[10]  Shah Shah,et al.  Error Analysis in History Matching: The Optimum Level of Parameterization , 1978 .

[11]  John Killough,et al.  History Matching Using the Method of Gradients: Two Case Studies , 1994 .

[12]  Ahmed Ouenes,et al.  A New, Fast Parallel Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Reservoir Characterization , 1993 .

[13]  Jonathan Carter,et al.  Improved Reservoir Characterization through Evolutionary Computation , 2000 .

[14]  Ahmed Ouenes,et al.  Parallel Reservoir Automatic History Matching Using a Network of Workstations and PVM , 1995 .

[15]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Parallel Iterative Linear Equation Solvers: An Investigation of Domain Decomposition Algorithms for Reservoir Simulation , 1987 .

[16]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  A New Automated History Matching Algorithm improved by Parallel Computing , 1999 .

[17]  Phani B. Gadde,et al.  Process-Based Decomposition on Distributed Systems - A Strategy to Solve Large Scale Simulation Problems , 2002 .

[18]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Use of External Parallelization to Improve History Matching , 1997 .

[19]  Denis José Schiozer Use of Reservoir Simulation, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques to Accelerate History Matching and Reservoir Management Decisions , 1999 .

[20]  J. Caers,et al.  Methods for History Matching under Geological Constraints , 2002 .

[21]  Ning Liu,et al.  Automatic History Matching of Geologic Facies , 2004 .

[22]  Khan,et al.  Parallel Reservoir Simulation Utilizing PC-Clusters in Massive Reservoir Simulation Models , 2003 .

[23]  L. Hu,et al.  Gradual Deformation of Continuous Geostatistical Models for History Matching , 1998 .

[24]  Th. Grussaute,et al.  Computer Aided History Matching of a Real Field Case , 1998 .

[25]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysical Properties Spatial Distributions, and Flow Performance Forecasts to Geostatistical Parameters Using Derivative Coefficients , 2002 .

[26]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  COMPUTATION OF SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENTS FOR CONDITIONING THE PERMEABILITY FIELD TO WELL-TEST PRESSURE DATA , 1995 .

[27]  John Killough Is Parallel Computing Ready for Reservoir Simulation? A Critical Analysis of the State of the Art , 1993 .

[28]  Olivier Gosselin,et al.  Gradient-Based History Matching With a Global Optimization Method , 2001 .