Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography.

PURPOSE To analyze the dynamics of the shear modulus of the liver to assess the optimal driving frequency and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of generalized frequency-independent elasticity cutoff values for staging hepatic fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This institutional review board-approved prospective study included 16 healthy volunteers and 72 patients with biopsy-proved liver fibrosis. After obtaining written informed consent, imaging was performed at 1.5-T by using a motion-sensitized echo-planar imaging sequence. Wave excitation was performed by an actuator introducing a superposition of four frequencies (25.0, 37.5, 50.0, 62.5 Hz) of shear waves. The elasticity µ value and the structure geometry parameter α were calculated by using the two-parameter springpot model. The performance of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography in staging liver fibrosis was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS Elasticity increased with stage of fibrosis, with mean values as follows: for volunteers, 2.25 kPa ± 0.43 (standard deviation); stage F1, 2.61 kPa ± 0.43; stage F2, 3.00 kPa ± 0.63; stage F3, 3.86 kPa ± 0.61; and stage F4, 5.86 kPa ± 1.22. Frequency-independent cutoff values derived for fibrosis and AUROC values, respectively, were as follows: stage F1 or higher, 2.84 kPa and 0.9128; stage F2 or higher, 3.18 kPa and 0.9244; stage F3 or higher, 3.32 kPa and 0.9744; and equivalent to stage F4, 4.21 kPa and 0.9931. The geometry of the tissue (α value) did not correlate with fibrosis. Frequencies of 50.0 Hz and 62.5 Hz displayed the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of multifrequency MR elastography in determining the degree of hepatic fibrosis increases with stage of fibrosis. Metrics obtained at the higher frequencies provide better diagnostic performance compared with the lower frequencies. Results of the AUROC analysis demonstrate the high accuracy of frequency-independent cutoff values for staging higher grades of hepatic fibrosis.

[1]  J. Hoofnagle,et al.  Classification of chronic hepatitis: Diagnosis, grading and staging , 1994, Hepatology.

[2]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[3]  H. Schiessel,et al.  Mesoscopic Pictures of the Sol-Gel Transition: Ladder Models and Fractal Networks , 1995 .

[4]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Liver fibrosis: non‐invasive assessment with MR elastography , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive markers to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. , 2006, Journal of hepatology.

[8]  Laurent Castera,et al.  Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases , 2006, Hepatology.

[9]  A. Manduca,et al.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[10]  P. Asbach,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  [Assessment of the solid-liquid behavior of the liver for the diagnosis of diffuse disease using magnetic resonance elastography]. , 2008, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[13]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Eva Herrmann,et al.  Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[15]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Untersuchung des fest-flüssig-materialverhaltens der leber zur nicht invasiven diagnose diffuser lebererkrankungen mittels magnetresonanz- elastografie , 2008 .

[16]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic fibrosis: Emerging clinical applications , 2007, Hepatology.

[17]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Gérard Forzy,et al.  Factors of accuracy of transient elastography (fibroscan) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2009, Hepatology.

[19]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Early detection of steatohepatitis in fatty rat liver by using MR elastography. , 2009, Radiology.

[20]  Eva Herrmann,et al.  Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis , 2010, NeuroImage.