Elucidation of the dynamic nature of interactome networks: A practical tutorial.

Considering that proteins are usually engaged in complex and dynamic networks of interactions to exert their activity, a way to understand proteins' functions and the molecular mechanisms in which those proteins are involved, is by studying their interactome. In this sense, this tutorial presents a simple pipeline for the analysis of the network of interactions of a protein in order to reach a biological interpretation of the mechanisms modulated by those interactions, and to understand how these interactions are affected by the experimental conditions. The entire pipeline is explained using as example the previously published work "Interacting network of the gap junction protein connexin43 is modulated by ischemia and reperfusion in the heart", and by using user-friendly and freely available software. Moreover, the pipeline presented in this article is not limited to interactomic approaches, being also useful for the analysis of dynamic alterations of other proteomic screenings. SIGNIFICANCE This tutorial presents a simplified pipeline for the analysis of the network of interactions of a protein in order to reach to a biological interpretation of the mechanisms modulated by those interactions, which constitutes an important way to understand proteins' functions and the molecular mechanisms in which those proteins are involved. Moreover, when interactomics is applied to perform an in-depth molecular analysis of novel disease proteins, it can result in an understanding of disease-causing mechanisms and create drug discovery opportunities. Nevertheless, the pipeline presented can be also useful for the analysis of dynamic alterations of other biomolecules.

[1]  H. Duffy The molecular mechanisms of gap junction remodeling. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system , 2013, Nature Methods.

[3]  Daniel E. Zak,et al.  PAINT: a promoter analysis and interaction network generation tool for gene regulatory network identification. , 2003, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[4]  Lan Huang,et al.  Profiling of Protein Interaction Networks of Protein Complexes Using Affinity Purification and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  M. Vidal,et al.  Interactome: gateway into systems biology. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[6]  B. Manadas,et al.  Short GeLC‐SWATH: A fast and reliable quantitative approach for proteomic screenings , 2015, Proteomics.

[7]  T. Muth,et al.  Viewing the proteome: How to visualize proteomics data? , 2015, Proteomics.

[8]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data independent mass spectrometry acquisition , 2013, Nature Methods.

[9]  P. Royston A Remark on Algorithm as 181: The W‐Test for Normality , 1995 .

[10]  Lokesh Kumar,et al.  Mfuzz: A software package for soft clustering of microarray data , 2007, Bioinformation.

[11]  D. Figeys Combining different 'omics' technologies to map and validate protein-protein interactions in humans. , 2004, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[12]  W. Alkema,et al.  BioVenn – a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[13]  T. Martins-Marques,et al.  Ischaemia-induced autophagy leads to degradation of gap junction protein connexin43 in cardiomyocytes. , 2015, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  C. Lo,et al.  Role of gap junctions in cardiac conduction and development: insights from the connexin knockout mice. , 2000, Circulation research.

[15]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Normalization and missing value imputation for label-free LC-MS analysis , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  Navdeep Jaitly,et al.  DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data , 2008, Bioinform..

[17]  G. Schmitt-Ulms,et al.  Co-immunoprecipitations revisited: an update on experimental concepts and their implementation for sensitive interactome investigations of endogenous proteins , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[18]  Dana Pascovici,et al.  Multiple testing corrections in quantitative proteomics: A useful but blunt tool , 2016, Proteomics.

[19]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Bruno Manadas,et al.  SWATH‐MS as a tool for biomarker discovery: From basic research to clinical applications , 2017, Proteomics.

[21]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[22]  B. Manadas,et al.  Interacting Network of the Gap Junction (GJ) Protein Connexin43 (Cx43) is Modulated by Ischemia and Reperfusion in the Heart* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  D. Megías,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Connexin 43 Reveals Novel Interactors Related to Osteoarthritis* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  L. Foster,et al.  Association of connexin43 with E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM21 reveals a mechanism for gap junction phosphodegron control. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  A. Bauer,et al.  Human protein-protein interaction networks and the value for drug discovery. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[26]  Kristoffer T G Rigbolt,et al.  GProX, a User-Friendly Platform for Bioinformatics Analysis and Visualization of Quantitative Proteomics Data* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[27]  Teresa M. Ribeiro-Rodrigues,et al.  Heart ischemia results in connexin43 ubiquitination localized at the intercalated discs. , 2015, Biochimie.

[28]  X. Cui,et al.  Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments , 2003, Genome Biology.

[29]  L. Bonetta Protein–protein interactions: Interactome under construction , 2010, Nature.