Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: effects of vowels in sets and order of training.

PURPOSE K. Nishi and D. Kewley-Port (2007) trained Japanese listeners to perceive 9 American English monophthongs and showed that a protocol using all 9 vowels (fullset) produced better results than the one using only the 3 more difficult vowels (subset). The present study extended the target population to Koreans and examined whether protocols combining the 2 vowel sets would provide more effective training. METHOD Three groups of 5 Korean listeners were trained on American English vowels for 9 days using one of the 3 protocols: fullset only, first 3 days on subset then 6 days on fullset, or first 6 days on fullset then 3 days on subset. Participants' performance was assessed by pre- and posttraining tests, as well as by a midtraining test. RESULTS (a) Fullset training was effective for Koreans as well as Japanese, (b) no advantage was found for the 2 combined protocols over the fullset-only protocol, and (c) sustained "nonimprovement" was observed for training using one of the combined protocols. CONCLUSIONS In using subsets for training on American English vowels, care should be taken not only in the selection of subset vowels but also in the training orders of subsets.

[1]  Byunggon Yang.  A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers , 1996 .

[2]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[3]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: influence of training sets. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  M. Shibatani,et al.  The languages of Japan , 1991 .

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  William Labov,et al.  The atlas of North American English : phonetics, phonology and sound change : a multimedia reference tool , 2006 .

[8]  J. Barlow,et al.  Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation. , 2002, Seminars in speech and language.

[9]  G. Studebaker.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners , 1998 .

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  柴谷 方良,et al.  The languages of Japan , 2009 .

[13]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  C. Best.  A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[16]  J. Gierut.  ENHANCEMENT OF LEARNING FOR CHILDREN WITH PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS , 2004 .

[17]  Reiko Akahane-Yamada,et al.  Perceptual assimilation of american English vowels by Japanese listeners , 1996, ICSLP.

[18]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. Bradlow.  10. Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /®/ - /l/ contrast , 2008 .

[20]  Y. Hirata,et al.  The Effects of Speaking Rates and Vowel Length on Formant Movements in Japanese , 2004 .

[21]  P. Juslin,et al.  Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[23]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[25]  J. Flege.  Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[26]  Ho-min Sohn.  The Korean language , 1999 .

[27]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  D G Jamieson,et al.  Evaluation of a technique for training new speech contrasts: generalization across voices, but not word-position or task. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  Winifred Strange,et al.  Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .

[32]  A. Jongman,et al.  Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.