Strengthening the Blockchain-Based Internet of Value with Trust

In recent years, Blockchain has been expected to create a secure mechanism for exchanging not only for cryptocurrency but also for other types of assets without the need for a powerful and trusted third-party. This could enable a new era of the Internet usage called the Internet of Value (IoV) in which any types of assets such as intellectual and digital properties, equity and wealth can be digitized and transferred in an automated, secure, and convenient manner. In the IoV, Blockchain is used to guarantee security of transactions that the transactions are nearly impossible to be altered; thus it is impractical to retract once a transaction is confirmed. Therefore, to strengthen the IoV, before making any transactions it is crucial to evaluate trust between participants for reducing the risk of dealing with malicious peers. In this article, we clarify the concept of IoV and propose a trust-based IoV model including a system architecture, components and features. Then, we present a trust platform in the IoV considering two concepts, Experience and Reputation, originated from Social Networks for evaluating trust between two any peers in the IoV. The Experience and Reputation are characterized and calculated using mathematical models with analysis and simulation in the IoV environment. We believe this paper consolidates the understandings about IoV technologies and demonstrates how trust is evaluated and used to strengthen the IoV. It also opens important research directions on both IoV and trust in the future.

[1]  Hyun-Woo Lee,et al.  Toward a Trust Evaluation Mechanism in the Social Internet of Things , 2017, Sensors.

[2]  S. Rahimifard,et al.  Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things to Improve Resource Efficiency in Food Supply Chains , 2017, Innovative Approaches and Applications for Sustainable Rural Development.

[3]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[4]  Ralph C. Merkle,et al.  Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems , 1980, 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[5]  Sergey Brin,et al.  Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[6]  D. Oswald,et al.  Friendship Maintenance: An Analysis of Individual and Dyad Behaviors , 2004 .

[7]  Vitalik Buterin A NEXT GENERATION SMART CONTRACT & DECENTRALIZED APPLICATION PLATFORM , 2015 .

[8]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy , 2015 .

[9]  Thomas V. Pollet,et al.  Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[10]  Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2009 .

[11]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Marko Vukolic,et al.  The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication , 2015, iNetSeC.

[13]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol , 2015, NSDI.

[14]  Ghassan O. Karame,et al.  Double-spending fast payments in bitcoin , 2012, CCS.

[15]  W. Bolt Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies : A Comprehensive Introduction , 2017 .

[16]  T. Moore,et al.  Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance , 2014 .

[17]  Jerry Brito,et al.  Bitcoin: A Primer for Policymakers , 2016 .

[18]  P A Putland,et al.  Electronic payment systems , 1997 .

[19]  Gyu Myoung Lee,et al.  Leverage a Trust Service Platform for Data Usage Control in Smart City , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[20]  Bo Zhou,et al.  From Personal Experience to Global Reputation for Trust Evaluation in the Social Internet of Things , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[21]  M. Iansiti,et al.  The Truth about Blockchain , 2017 .

[22]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.