Evaluation of Road Safety Audit on Existing Freeway by Empirical Bayes Method

Road safety audit is the preventive enhancement strategy for safety. : it gets rid of beforehand the potential factor of a traffic accident in the stage of road planning and design and it evaluates the appropriation for road geometric structure or safety facility to prevent traffic accident in the stage of operation after the construction. Since this strategy is introduced to our country in the early 2000s, various projects have been processed and it was legislated recently. And now, the evaluation of past project for its continuation is needed. Therefore, in this study the evaluation of road safety audit on existing freeway is performed. The spatial extent of this study is Yong-dong line on which the safety treatment was executed in 2005 and 2006. And, the temporal range of this study is each 2-year of before and after from 2005 and 2006. The empirical bayes method of observational evaluation studies is applied to analyze. As a result, there is an effect of improvement on most of treated sections. But there is ineffective or negligible on some sections. Compared with the detail of treatment on each section, the effect of multiple or various treatments is good for that section. On the other hand, the section on which effect doesn`t appear is the result of single or unimportant treatments. Throughout these results, the concrete analysis can be performed and the countermeasures designed for the section on which effect doesn`t appear. Also it is used as reference to the future plan and direction of road safety audit on existing freeway.

[1]  R Kulmala,et al.  Measuring the safety effect of road measures at junctions. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  D F Jarrett,et al.  Accidents at blackspots: Estimating the effectiveness of remedial treatment with special reference to the 'Regression-to-Mean' effect , 1981 .

[3]  Karin M Bauer,et al.  Safety Effects of Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to Increase Capacity of Urban Freeways , 2004 .

[4]  Richard A Retting,et al.  Crash reduction following installation of centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane roads. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Use of Propensity Score Matching Method and Hybrid Bayesian Method to Estimate Crash Modification Factors of Signal Installation , 2006 .

[6]  B. Persaud,et al.  Observational Before-After Study of the Safety Effect of TRB ID : 01-0562 U . S . Roundabout Conversions Using the Empirical Bayes Method , 2006 .

[7]  Lode Vereeck,et al.  Safety effects of roundabouts in Flanders: signal type, speed limits and vulnerable road users. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Albert Gan,et al.  Development of Crash Reduction Factors: Methods, Problems, and Research Needs , 2003 .

[9]  Wen Li,et al.  Iowa's Experience with Road Diet Measures , 2006 .

[10]  Craig Lyon,et al.  Development of a Procedure for Estimating Expected Safety Effects of a Contemplated Traffic Signal Installation , 2003 .

[11]  Geni Bahar,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Snow-Plowable Pavement Markers , 2004 .

[12]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety evaluation of stop sign in-fill program , 2006 .

[13]  Michael S. Griffith,et al.  Estimating Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota , 2007 .

[14]  John N. Ivan,et al.  Safety Benefits of Intersection Approach Realignment on Rural Two-Lane Highways , 2001 .

[15]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Estimating the safety performance of urban road transportation networks. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.