Genome sequencing among children with medical complexity: What constitutes value from parents’ perspective?

Genome sequencing (GS) has demonstrated high diagnostic yield in pediatric patients with complex, clinically heterogeneous presentations. Emerging evidence shows generally favorable experiences for patients and families receiving GS. As a result, implementation of GS in pediatrics is gaining momentum. To inform implementation, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the personal utility of GS for parents of children with medical complexity (CMC). GS was performed at an academic tertiary‐care center for CMC for whom a genetic etiology was suspected. Following the return of GS results, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents about their child's diagnostic journey. Of the children whose parents were interviewed, six children received a diagnosis, two received a possible diagnosis, and six did not receive a diagnosis. A predominantly deductive thematic analysis approach to the interview data was used by applying Kohler's personal utility framework to understand affective, cognitive, behavioral and social impacts of GS. Both the diagnosed and undiagnosed groups experienced enhanced emotion‐focused coping (affective). The diagnosed group experienced favorable utility related to knowledge of condition (cognitive) and communication with relatives (behavioral). A domain beyond Kohler's framework related to the presence or absence of GS impact on medical management was also described by parents. The deployment of GS late in the diagnostic odyssey and the limited knowledge available for the rare genetic disorders diagnosed in this cohort appeared to diminish the perceived utility of GS. As GS capabilities continue to evolve at a rapid pace and become available earlier in the diagnostic journey, it is important to consider the impact and timing of testing on parents of CMC.

[1]  R. Hayeems,et al.  Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review , 2021, Children.

[2]  H. Osiovich,et al.  Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences , 2020, Journal of genetic counseling.

[3]  Kiely N. James,et al.  An RCT of Rapid Genomic Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants Results in High Clinical Utility, Changes in Management, and Low Perceived Harm. , 2020, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants. , 2020, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  S. Scherer,et al.  Genome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Test in Children With Unexplained Medical Complexity , 2020, JAMA network open.

[6]  G. Henderson,et al.  Parents’ perceptions of personal utility of exome sequencing results , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[7]  M. Rentería,et al.  Genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: trends, challenges and ethical considerations. , 2019, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[8]  S. Soden,et al.  Parents of Newborns in the NICU Enrolled in Genome Sequencing Research: Hopeful, but Not Naïve , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[9]  J. Belmont,et al.  Case for genome sequencing in infants and children with rare, undiagnosed or genetic diseases , 2019, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[10]  S. Wordsworth,et al.  Evaluating the Outcomes Associated with Genomic Sequencing: A Roadmap for Future Research , 2018, PharmacoEconomics - Open.

[11]  Kathryn A Phillips,et al.  Themed Section: Assesing the Value of Next-Generation Sequencing Methodological Issues in Assessing the Economic Value of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests: Many Challenges and Not Enough Solutions , 2018 .

[12]  Zornitza Stark,et al.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of genome and exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with suspected genetic diseases , 2018, npj Genomic Medicine.

[13]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization , 2018, npj Genomic Medicine.

[14]  K. Machaczek,et al.  Family planning decisions for parents of children with a rare genetic condition: A scoping review. , 2017, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[15]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study , 2017, Clinical genetics.

[16]  Daniele Merico,et al.  Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  Y. Kuo,et al.  Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004-2014. , 2017, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  Martin Eden,et al.  Toward health technology assessment of whole-genome sequencing diagnostic tests: challenges and solutions. , 2017, Personalized medicine.

[19]  R. Cohn,et al.  Genetic Testing among Children in a Complex Care Program , 2017, Children.

[20]  J. Kohler,et al.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review , 2017, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[21]  Robert C. Green,et al.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results , 2017, Public Health Genomics.

[22]  Elaine Lyon,et al.  The Spectrum of Clinical Utilities in Molecular Pathology Testing Procedures for Inherited Conditions and Cancer: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[23]  L. Vissers,et al.  Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[24]  Rebecca C. Spillmann,et al.  Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[25]  Michael Brudno,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in paediatric medicine , 2016, npj Genomic Medicine.

[26]  E. Petty,et al.  Anticipated Motivation for Genetic Testing among Smokers, Nonsmokers, and Former Smokers: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Decision Making , 2014, Public Health Genomics.

[27]  A. Janssens,et al.  Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing? , 2014, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[28]  J. MacMillan,et al.  Huntington Disease: Who Seeks Presymptomatic Genetic Testing, Why and What are the Outcomes? , 2014, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[29]  J. Reitsma,et al.  Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy: The Clinical Utility of Diagnostic Tests , 2012 .

[30]  Eyal Cohen,et al.  Patterns and Costs of Health Care Use of Children With Medical Complexity , 2012, Pediatrics.

[31]  Eng-King Tan,et al.  Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing in neurological diseases , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[32]  Eyal Cohen,et al.  A national profile of caregiver challenges among more medically complex children with special health care needs. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[33]  A. L. Norberg,et al.  Increased prevalence of burnout symptoms in parents of chronically ill children , 2010, Acta paediatrica.

[34]  Richard R Sharp,et al.  Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[35]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  What is the clinical utility of genetic testing? , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[36]  A. Tse,et al.  STRESS IN FAMILIES WITH MEDICALLY FRAGILE CHILDREN , 2002, Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing.

[37]  S. Green,et al.  "We're tired, not sad": benefits and burdens of mothering a child with a disability. , 2007, Social science & medicine.