Assignment of protein interactions from affinity purification/mass spectrometry data.

The combination of affinity purification with mass spectrometry analysis has become the method of choice for protein complex characterization. With the improved performance of mass spectrometry technology, the sensitivity of the analyses is increasing, probing deeper into molecular interactions and yielding longer lists of proteins. These identify not only core complex subunits but also the more inaccessible proteins that interact weakly or transiently. Alongside them, contaminant proteins, which are often abundant proteins in the cell, tend to be recovered in affinity experiments because they bind nonspecifically and with low affinity to matrix, tag, and/or antibody. The challenge now lies in discriminating nonspecific binders from true interactors, particularly at the low level and in a larger scale. This review aims to summarize the variety of methods that have been used to distinguish contaminants from specific interactions in the past few years, ranging from manual elimination using heuristic rules to more sophisticated probabilistic scoring approaches. We aim to give awareness on the processing that takes place before an interaction list is reported and on the different types of list curation approaches suited to the different experiments.

[1]  J. Koziol,et al.  Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomics analysis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  A. Hyman,et al.  Quantitative Interaction Proteomics and Genome-wide Profiling of Epigenetic Histone Marks and Their Readers , 2010, Cell.

[3]  D. Figeys,et al.  Analysis of protein interaction networks using mass spectrometry compatible techniques. , 2006, Analytica chimica acta.

[4]  Zhaohui S. Qin,et al.  A Global Protein Kinase and Phosphatase Interaction Network in Yeast , 2010, Science.

[5]  Anne-Claude Gingras,et al.  A Lentiviral Functional Proteomics Approach Identifies Chromatin Remodeling Complexes Important for the Induction of Pluripotency* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Mihaela E. Sardiu,et al.  Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Michael K. Coleman,et al.  Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[8]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Anne-Claude Gavin,et al.  Towards quantitative analysis of proteome dynamics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Michael K. Coleman,et al.  Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Xian Chen,et al.  In vivo dual-tagging proteomic approach in studying signaling pathways in immune response. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology 6; Article number 448; doi:10.1038/msb.2010.104 Citation: Molecular Systems Biology 6:448 , 2022 .

[13]  F. Boisvert,et al.  Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  M. Moran,et al.  Large-scale mapping of human protein–protein interactions by mass spectrometry , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Patrick Rodriguez,et al.  Isolation of transcription factor complexes by in vivo biotinylation tagging and direct binding to streptavidin beads. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Michael P Washburn,et al.  The HIR corepressor complex binds to nucleosomes generating a distinct protein/DNA complex resistant to remodeling by SWI/SNF. , 2005, Genes & development.

[17]  K. Gould,et al.  A Global Census of Fission Yeast Deubiquitinating Enzyme Localization and Interaction Networks Reveals Distinct Compartmentalization Profiles and Overlapping Functions in Endocytosis and Polarity , 2010, PLoS biology.

[18]  Bernhard Küster,et al.  Comprehensive Proteomic Analysis of Human Par Protein Complexes Reveals an Interconnected Protein Network* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  C. MacKintosh,et al.  Differential 14-3-3 Affinity Capture Reveals New Downstream Targets of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  R. Durbin,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins , 2010, Science.

[21]  M. Babu,et al.  An Expanded Oct4 Interaction Network: Implications for Stem Cell Biology, Development, and Disease , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[22]  M. Mann,et al.  Extracting gene function from protein-protein interactions using Quantitative BAC InteraCtomics (QUBIC). , 2011, Methods.

[23]  A. Heck,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Regulation of Dynamic Components within TATA-binding Protein (TBP) Transcription Complexes*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[25]  Julian Mintseris,et al.  A Protein Complex Network of Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Cell.

[26]  R. Aebersold,et al.  An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  Irina M. Armean,et al.  In Vivo Analysis of Proteomes and Interactomes Using Parallel Affinity Capture (iPAC) Coupled to Mass Spectrometry , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[28]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Profiling Core Proteomes of Human Cell Lines by One-dimensional PAGE and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry*S , 2003, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[29]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics in cell biology , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Matthias Selbach,et al.  Analyzing protein-protein interactions by quantitative mass spectrometry. , 2011, Methods.

[31]  Markus Müller,et al.  Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Protein Complexes , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[32]  M. Taoka,et al.  Large‐scale identification of proteins expressed in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2005, Proteomics.

[33]  Anne-Claude Gavin,et al.  Recent advances in charting protein-protein interaction: mass spectrometry-based approaches. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[34]  Jyoti S Choudhary,et al.  Mapping multiprotein complexes by affinity purification and mass spectrometry. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[35]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Hyungwon Choi,et al.  Label‐free quantitative proteomics and SAINT analysis enable interactome mapping for the human Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 5 , 2011, Proteomics.

[38]  S. Gygi,et al.  Defining the Human Deubiquitinating Enzyme Interaction Landscape , 2009, Cell.

[39]  A. Bauer,et al.  Human protein-protein interaction networks and the value for drug discovery. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[40]  Lan Huang,et al.  Identifying Dynamic Interactors of Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[41]  Michael K. Coleman,et al.  Analyzing chromatin remodeling complexes using shotgun proteomics and normalized spectral abundance factors. , 2006, Methods.

[42]  D. Figeys Mapping the human protein interactome , 2008, Cell Research.

[43]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[44]  Hiroyuki Kaji,et al.  Large-scale identification of Caenorhabditis elegans proteins by multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.

[45]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[46]  Matthias Mann,et al.  High confidence determination of specific protein-protein interactions using quantitative mass spectrometry. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[47]  Blagoy Blagoev,et al.  A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  B. Chait,et al.  I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[49]  Debbie L C van den Berg,et al.  An Oct4-Centered Protein Interaction Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[50]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome Organization in a Genome-Reduced Bacterium , 2009, Science.

[51]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[52]  Matthew J. Brauer,et al.  Mapping the NPHP-JBTS-MKS Protein Network Reveals Ciliopathy Disease Genes and Pathways , 2011, Cell.

[53]  John R Yates,et al.  A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. , 2004, Genes & development.

[54]  T. Jensen,et al.  The human core exosome interacts with differentially localized processive RNases: hDIS3 and hDIS3L , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[55]  Advanced MudPIT as a next step toward high proteome coverage , 2011, Proteomics.

[56]  N. Karp,et al.  Addressing Accuracy and Precision Issues in iTRAQ Quantitation* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[57]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  An integrated mass spectrometric and computational framework for the analysis of protein interaction networks , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  Reinout Raijmakers,et al.  Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[60]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Identification of Putative Androgen Receptor Interaction Protein Modules , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[61]  M. Washburn Driving biochemical discovery with quantitative proteomics. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[62]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  Initial characterization of the human central proteome , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[63]  A. Hyman,et al.  Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Atlas of the Physical Interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[65]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[66]  M. Washburn,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  T. Jensen,et al.  Interaction profiling identifies the human nuclear exosome targeting complex. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[68]  Mihaela E. Sardiu,et al.  Highly Reproducible Label Free Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of RNA Polymerase Complexes* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[69]  Tom Alber,et al.  Purification and characterization of HIV–human protein complexes , 2010, Methods.

[70]  A. Shilatifard,et al.  Molecular regulation of histone H3 trimethylation by COMPASS and the regulation of gene expression. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[71]  S. Gygi,et al.  Network organization of the human autophagy system , 2010, Nature.

[72]  K. Hogue,et al.  Protein Interactions of Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN) and Its Cancer-associated G20E Mutant Compared by Using Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture-based Parallel Affinity Purification* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  Patrick Rodriguez,et al.  Efficient biotinylation and single-step purification of tagged transcription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  M. Wilm Quantitative proteomics in biological research , 2009, Proteomics.

[75]  Lei Fang,et al.  Characterization of the human COP9 signalosome complex using affinity purification and mass spectrometry. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[76]  Y. Wang,et al.  Streamlined analysis schema for high-throughput identification of endogenous protein complexes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[78]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  A physical and functional map of the human TNF-α/NF-κB signal transduction pathway , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[79]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[80]  Anne-Claude Gavin,et al.  The social network of a cell: recent advances in interactome mapping. , 2008, Biotechnology annual review.

[81]  Lan Huang,et al.  Profiling of Protein Interaction Networks of Protein Complexes Using Affinity Purification and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[82]  Jyoti S Choudhary,et al.  Quantitative proteomics reveals the basis for the biochemical specificity of the cell-cycle machinery. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[83]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  The Protein Composition of Mitotic Chromosomes Determined Using Multiclassifier Combinatorial Proteomics , 2010, Cell.

[84]  M. Washburn,et al.  A label free quantitative proteomic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleus. , 2009, Journal of proteomics.

[85]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[86]  Peng-Yuan Yang,et al.  Biotin tagging coupled with amino acid‐coded mass tagging for efficient and precise screening of interaction proteome in mammalian cells , 2009, Proteomics.

[87]  D. Chan,et al.  Analysis of the Human Endogenous Coregulator Complexome , 2011, Cell.

[88]  Brian Raught,et al.  A PP2A Phosphatase High Density Interaction Network Identifies a Novel Striatin-interacting Phosphatase and Kinase Complex Linked to the Cerebral Cavernous Malformation 3 (CCM3) Protein*S , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[89]  D. Figeys,et al.  A Novel Proteomics Approach for the Discovery of Chromatin-associated Protein Networks*S , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[90]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[91]  John R Yates,et al.  Applicability of Tandem Affinity Purification MudPIT to Pathway Proteomics in Yeast*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.