Zero-one survival behavior of cyclically competing species.

The coexistence of competing species is, due to unavoidable fluctuations, always transient. In this Letter, we investigate the ultimate survival probabilities characterizing different species in cyclic competition. We show that they often obey a surprisingly simple, though nontrivial behavior. Within a model where coexistence is neutrally stable, we demonstrate a robust zero-one law: When the interactions between the three species are (generically) asymmetric, the "weakest" species survives at a probability that tends to one for large population sizes, while the other two are guaranteed to extinction. We rationalize our findings from stochastic simulations by an analytic approach.

[1]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[2]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[3]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Instability of spatial patterns and its ambiguous impact on species diversity. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[4]  T. Reichenbach,et al.  Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games , 2007, Nature.

[5]  L. Buss,et al.  Alleopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka-Volterra model. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Anomalous finite-size effects in the Battle of the Sexes , 2007, 0709.0225.

[8]  R. Busing,et al.  The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography , 2002 .

[9]  Robert M. May,et al.  Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics , 1994, Nature.

[10]  P. J. Hughesdon,et al.  The Struggle for Existence , 1927, Nature.

[11]  Crossover behaviour of 3-species systems with mutations or migrations , 2003, nlin/0307006.

[12]  Marcus Frean,et al.  Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Noise and correlations in a spatial population model with cyclic competition. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[15]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[17]  C. Hauert,et al.  Coevolutionary dynamics: from finite to infinite populations. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[18]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[19]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[20]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Cyclic dominance and biodiversity in well-mixed populations. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[21]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[22]  R. Durrett,et al.  Spatial aspects of interspecific competition. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  M Ifti,et al.  Survival and extinction in cyclic and neutral three-species systems , 2002, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.