A multi-stage machine learning model on diagnosis of esophageal manometry

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the primary procedure used to diagnose esophageal motility disorders. Its interpretation and classification includes an initial evaluation of swallow-level outcomes and then derivation of a study-level diagnosis based on Chicago Classification (CC), using a tree-like algorithm. This diagnostic approach on motility disordered using HRM was mirrored using a multi-stage modeling framework developed using a combination of various machine learning approaches. Specifically, the framework includes deep-learning models at the swallow-level stage and feature-based machine learning models at the study-level stage. In the swallow-level stage, three models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to predict swallow type, swallow pressurization, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The first two models are classification model with test accuracies of 0.88 and 0.93, respectively, whereas the IRP model is regression model with the test error of 4.49(mmHg). These models offer the best performance on related tasks to our knowledge. At the study-level stage, model selection from families of the expert-knowledge-based rule models, xgboost models and artificial neural network(ANN) models were conducted, ∗Corresponding author Email address: w-kou@northwestern.edu (Wenjun Kou) Preprint submitted to AI in Medicine June 29, 2021 with the latter two model designed and augmented with motivation from the export knowledge. A simple model-agnostic strategy of model balancing motivated by Bayesian principles was utilized, which gave rise to model averaging weighted by precision scores. The averaged (blended) models and individual models were compared and evaluated, of which the best performance on test dataset is 0.81 in top-1 prediction, 0.92 in top-2 predictions. This is the first artificial-intelligence-style model to automatically predict CC diagnosis of HRM study from raw multi-swallow data. Moreover, the proposed modeling framework could be easily extended to multi-modal tasks, such as diagnosis of esophageal patients based on clinical data from both HRM and functional luminal imaging probe panometry (FLIP).

[1]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. , 2019, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[2]  C. Le Berre,et al.  Application of Artificial Intelligence to Gastroenterology and Hepatology. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[3]  Stefano Merigliano,et al.  A Procedure for the Automatic Analysis of High-Resolution Manometry Data to Support the Clinical Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[5]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[6]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  E. Savarino,et al.  High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation , 2018, United European gastroenterology journal.

[8]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Normal Values of Esophageal Distensibility and Distension‐Induced Contractility Measured by Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry , 2019, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[9]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial , 2016 .

[10]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[11]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[12]  Fei Wang,et al.  Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..

[13]  P. Alam ‘N’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[14]  A. Farmer,et al.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Gastroenterology— Promises and Pitfalls , 2018, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  Ahmed Hosny,et al.  Artificial intelligence in radiology , 2018, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Inter‐rater agreement of novel high‐resolution impedance manometry metrics: Bolus flow time and esophageal impedance integral ratio , 2018, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[17]  Kagan Tumer,et al.  Classifier ensembles: Select real-world applications , 2008, Inf. Fusion.

[18]  Yuan Luo,et al.  A deep-learning-based unsupervised model on esophageal manometry using variational autoencoder , 2021, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[19]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[20]  H. Parkman,et al.  Advanced training in neurogastroenterology and gastrointestinal motility. , 2015, Gastroenterology.

[21]  Muzhou Hou,et al.  Attention graph convolutional nets for esophageal contraction pattern recognition in high-resolution manometries , 2021, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[22]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0 , 2015, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.