A numerical performance comparison of a dual-phase steel and aluminium alloy bumper bar system

Bumper bar systems are important automotive structures to help protect passengers during frontal and rear collisions. This paper presents the outcomes of a numerical modelling study of a simple rectangular cross section bumper bar system using the explicit finite element code LS Dyna for a low velocity (16 km/h) centre pole frontal impact. The study utilises and compares a dual-phase steel (DP600) and two aluminium alloys (A16061T6 and A17108T6). A simple material model using isotropic elastic plastic material behaviour is utilised together with a failure criterion. When the bumper system weight is held constant by reducing the wall thickness of the steel bumper system, both aluminium alloy bumpers outperform the high-strength dual-phase steel.

[1]  W. J. Witteman,et al.  MODELING OF AN INNOVATIVE FRONTAL CAR STRUCTURE: SIMILAR DECELERATION CURVES AT FULL OVERLAP, 40 PER CENT OFFSET AND 30 DEGREES COLLISION , 1998 .

[2]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Offset impact behaviour of bumper beam–longitudinal systems: numerical simulations , 2006 .

[3]  E C Chirwa,et al.  An offset rigid barrier-based test: equivalence to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety frontal offset impact safety test , 2006 .

[4]  David A. Sindrey.  Steel Bumper Systems for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks , 1999 .

[5]  J. D. Reid.  Crashworthiness of automotive steel midrails: Thickness and material sensitivity , 1996 .

[6]  Marian Ostrowski,et al.  Feasibility study of an adaptive energy absorbing system for passenger vehicles , 2005 .

[7]  T. Frank,et al.  Recent development and applications of the Gurson model , 2006 .

[8]  Magnus Langseth,et al.  Modeling of textured aluminum alloys used in a bumper system: Material tests and characterization , 2006 .

[9]  D R Lesuer,et al.  Modeling Large-Strain, High-Rate Deformation in Metals , 2001 .

[10]  A. Gurson.  Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth: Part I—Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Porous Ductile Media , 1977 .

[11]  Frédéric Barlat,et al.  Spring-back evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic-kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions: Part I: theory and formulation , 2005 .

[12]  Odd Sture Hopperstad,et al.  Offset impact behaviour of bumper beam—longitudinal systems: experimental investigations , 2006 .

[13]  Satyanarayana Kokkula,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF AN AUTOMOTIVE BUMPER BEAM-LONGITUDINAL SYSTEM AT 40% OFFSET IMPACT: AN EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY , 2006 .

[14]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models , 2005 .

[15]  Kwansoo Chung,et al.  Spring-back evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic-kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions: Part II: characterization of material properties , 2005 .

[16]  A. Ockewitz,et al.  Damage Modelling of Automobile Components of Aluminium Materials under Crash Loading , 2006 .

[17]  J. D. Reid.  Towards the understanding of material property influence on automotive crash structures , 1996 .