How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information

Political behaviour increasingly takes place on digital platforms, where people are presented with a range of social information—real-time feedback about the behaviour of peers and reference groups—which can stimulate (or depress) participation. This social information is hypothesized to impact the distribution of political activity, stimulating participation in mobilizations that are increasing in popularity, and depressing participation in those that appear to be less popular, leading to a non-normal distribution. Changes to these platforms can generate natural experiments allowing for an estimate of the impact of different kinds of social information on participation. This paper tests the hypothesis that social information shapes the distribution of political mobilizations by examining the introduction of trending information to the homepage of the UK government petition platform. The introduction of the trending feature did not increase the overall number of signatures per day, but the distribution of signatures across petitions changed significantly—the most popular petitions gained more signatures at the expense of those with fewer signatories. We further find significant differences between petitions trending at different ranks on the homepage. This evidence suggests that the ubiquity of trending information on digital platforms is introducing instability into political markets, as has been shown for cultural markets. As well as highlighting the importance of digital design in shaping political behaviour, the findings suggest that a non-negligible group of individuals visit the homepage of the site looking for petitions to sign, without having decided the issues they wish to support in advance. These ‘aimless petitioners’ are particularly susceptible to changes in social information.

[1]  Vicenç Gómez,et al.  Online Petitioning Through Data Exploration and What We Found There: A Dataset of Petitions from Avaaz.org , 2018, ICWSM.

[2]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence From Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections , 2017, Communication Research.

[3]  Lucas Böttcher,et al.  Temporal dynamics of online petitions , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  Vicenç Gómez,et al.  To Thread or Not to Thread: The Impact of Conversation Threading on Online Discussion , 2017, ICWSM.

[5]  R. Donders,et al.  Examining the construct and known-group validity of a composite endpoint for The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS); A large-scale data sharing initiative , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action , 2015 .

[7]  D. Carpenter,et al.  Party Formation through Petitions: The Whigs and the Bank War of 1832–1834 , 2015, Studies in American Political Development.

[8]  Catherine L. Dumas,et al.  Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We the People , 2015, Big Data Soc..

[9]  Gary Hsieh,et al.  How Activists Are Both Born and Made: An Analysis of Users on Change.org , 2015, CHI.

[10]  S. Wright.  Populism and Downing Street E-petitions: Connective Action, Hybridity, and the Changing Nature of Organizing , 2015 .

[11]  Andrei V. Chugunov,et al.  Measurement techniques for e-participation assessment: case of Russian e-petitions portal , 2014, ICEGOV.

[12]  D. Carpenter,et al.  When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women , 2014, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Michael Szell,et al.  Interevent time distributions of human multi-level activity in a virtual world , 2014, ArXiv.

[14]  Jessica L. Beyer.  Expect Us: Online Communities and Political Mobilization , 2014 .

[15]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Gene-Wide Analysis Detects Two New Susceptibility Genes for Alzheimer's Disease , 2014, PLoS ONE.

[16]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Mapping the UK webspace: fifteen years of british universities on the web , 2014, WebSci '14.

[17]  Eduardo G. Altmann,et al.  Predictability of Extreme Events in Social Media , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  W. Bennett,et al.  Response to Sidney Tarrow’s review of The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics , 2013, Perspectives on Politics.

[19]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Rapid rise and decay in petition signing , 2013, EPJ Data Science.

[20]  P. Mason.  Why it's STILL Kicking Off Everywhere , 2013 .

[21]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street website , 2013, WebSci.

[22]  T. Dunning.  Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach , 2012 .

[23]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[24]  S. Wright.  Assessing (e-)Democratic Innovations: “Democratic Goods” and Downing Street E-Petitions , 2012 .

[25]  Rosa Borge,et al.  Surfing the Net: A Pathway to Participation for the Politically Uninterested? , 2011 .

[26]  Ralf Lindner,et al.  Broadening Participation Through E‐Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament , 2011 .

[27]  Andreas Jungherr,et al.  The Political Click : Political Participation through E-Petitions in Germany , 2010 .

[28]  Peter John,et al.  Mobilizing citizen effort to enhance environmental outcomes: a randomized controlled trial of a door-to-door recycling campaign. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Jen Shang,et al.  A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods , 2009 .

[30]  Graham Smith.  Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation - Theories of Institutional Design , 2009 .

[31]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics in Cultural Markets , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages , 2009, CHI.

[33]  Warren Sack.  Discourse Architecture and Very Large-scale Conversation , 2009 .

[34]  Wolfgang J. Luhan,et al.  Cedex Discussion Paper Series , 2022 .

[35]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels , 2008 .

[36]  C. Wilcox.  Internet Fundraising in 2008: A New Model? , 2008 .

[37]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions , 2008 .

[38]  Christopher W. Larimer,et al.  Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[39]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[40]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[41]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[42]  B. Frey,et al.  Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment , 2004 .

[43]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  A. Lupia,et al.  Which Public Goods are Endangered?: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect The Logic of Collective Action , 2003 .

[45]  V. Muggeo.  Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[46]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks , 1999 .

[47]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling , 1999 .

[48]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[49]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[50]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[51]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[52]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Sridhar Narayanan,et al.  Measuring Position Effects in Search Advertising: A Regression Discontinuity Approach , 2011 .

[54]  P. Mason.  Why It's Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions , 2011 .

[55]  A. Chadwick.  Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[56]  M. Muggeo,et al.  segmented: An R package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships , 2008 .

[57]  James Andreoni,et al.  Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising , 2006 .

[58]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[59]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Handbooks in economics , 1981 .

[60]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .