Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth.

Because of the rising cesarean birth rate in the United States, renewed interest in vaginal delivery after prior abdominal operation has been evident. In a prospective collaborative study 789 patients were evaluated for inclusion into this investigation. Of the 717 subjects who entered the study 162 chose to attempt vaginal birth and 101 were successful. Desire for tubal sterilization and the lack of prior vaginal delivery were significant correlates of the group selecting repeat abdominal birth and of those who were unsuccessful when vaginal delivery was attempted. There were eight dehiscences and three uterine ruptures among the 717 patients and none was related to catastrophic outcome for the mother or neonate. Perinatal losses (12) were not related to uterine rupture or method of delivery. There were no significant differences in uterine disruption between patients selecting either route of delivery. Likewise ancillary factors such as a prior febrile puerperium (endometritis), number of prior cesarean births, low-vertical uterine incisions, recurrent operative indications, the use of epidural anesthesia, or oxytocin administration were not discriminating factors in whether women chose to attempt or were successful in completing vaginal delivery after prior abdominal birth. From our data vaginal birth after cesarean section appears to be safe if conducted in a carefully selected population that is closely monitored in a prospective manner.

[1]  D. Sloan Inconclusive conclusion (cesarean section). , 1968, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  BERKELEY S MERRILL,et al.  Planned Vaginal Delivery Following Cesarean Section , 1978, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  C. Pauerstein,et al.  Trial of Labor after Low Segment Cesarean Section , 1969, Southern medical journal.

[4]  F. P. Meehan,et al.  Vaginal Delivery under Caudal Analgesia after Caesarean Section and other Major Uterine Surgery , 1972, British medical journal.

[5]  T. Thompson,et al.  Effect of antenatal administration of Betamethasone on hospital costs and survival of premature infants. , 1981, Pediatrics.

[6]  H. Minkoff,et al.  The Rising Cesarean Section Rate: Can It Safely Be Reversed? , 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Wilson Labor and delivery after cesarean section. , 1951, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  D. Petitti,et al.  Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  B. Horowitz,et al.  Once a Cesarean...always a Cesarean , 1981 .

[10]  Garnet Jd UTERINE RUPTURE DURING PREGNANCY. AN ANALYSIS OF 133 PATIENTS. , 1964 .

[11]  H. L. Riva,et al.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. , 1961, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. Simpson,et al.  Diabetes in pregnancy, Northwestern University series (1977-1981). I. Prospective study of anomalies in offspring of mothers with diabetes mellitus. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  M. Miodovnik,et al.  Vaginal Delivery in Patients with a Prior Cesarean Section , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  R. Cosgrove Management of pregnancy and delivery following cesarean section. , 1951, Journal of the American Medical Association.