Task-based lens design with application to digital mammography.

Recent advances in model observers that predict human perceptual performance now make it possible to optimize medical imaging systems for human task performance. We illustrate the procedure by considering the design of a lens for use in an optically coupled digital mammography system. The channelized Hotelling observer is used to model human performance, and the channels chosen are differences of Gaussians. The task performed by the model observer is detection of a lesion at a random but known location in a clustered lumpy background mimicking breast tissue. The entire system is simulated with a Monte Carlo application according to physics principles, and the main system component under study is the imaging lens that couples a fluorescent screen to a CCD detector. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the channelized Hotelling observer is used to quantify this detectability of the simulated lesion (signal) on the simulated mammographic background. Plots of channelized Hotelling SNR versus signal location for various lens apertures, various working distances, and various focusing places are presented. These plots thus illustrate the trade-off between coupling efficiency and blur in a task-based manner. In this way, the channelized Hotelling SNR is used as a merit function for lens design.

[1]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[2]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  Majid Rabbani,et al.  Analysis of signal and noise propagation for several imaging mechanisms , 1989 .

[5]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  A Systematic Approach to the Design of Diagnostic Systems for Nuclear Medicine , 1986 .

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  L. C. Henyey,et al.  Diffuse radiation in the Galaxy , 1940 .

[10]  David P. Trauernicht,et al.  The Measurement Of Conversion Noise In X-Ray Intensifying Screens , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[11]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: determination of Swank factor by pulse height spectroscopy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Correlated point processes in radiological imaging , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[13]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  G. Knoll.  Radiation detection and measurement , 1979 .

[15]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[16]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Objective Assessment of Image Quality , 2005 .

[17]  P F Judy,et al.  LESION DETECTION AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN CT IMAGES , 1981, Medical physics.

[18]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Spatiotemporal frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells , 1987, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[21]  Rudolf Kingslake,et al.  Lens Design Fundamentals , 1978 .

[22]  N. Aronszajn.  Theory of Reproducing Kernels. , 1950 .

[23]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Depth-dependent phosphor blur in indirect x-ray imaging sensors , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  Daniel James Mickish.  Radiation Transfer In Medical X-Ray Intensifying Screens , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[25]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Detection and Recognition of Simple Spatial Forms , 1983 .

[27]  H. Hotelling.  The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[28]  C Abbey,et al.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. , 1999, Optics express.

[29]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  Akira Ishimaru,et al.  Wave propagation and scattering in random media , 1997 .

[32]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[34]  P. Munro,et al.  A quantum accounting and detective quantum efficiency analysis for video-based portal imaging. , 1997, Medical physics.

[35]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  J. L. Melsa,et al.  Decision and Estimation Theory , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[37]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  Transformation of characteristic functionals through imaging systems. , 2002, Optics express.

[38]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[39]  M.A. King,et al.  A comparison of human observer LROC and numerical observer ROC for tumor detection in SPECT images , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[40]  H. V. Hulst.  Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[41]  Kenneth M. Hanson.  Detectability In The Presence Of Computed Tomographic Reconstruction Noise , 1977, Other Conferences.

[42]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[43]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[44]  M. Stone.  Linear transformations in Hilbert space and their applications to analysis , 1932 .

[45]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[46]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[48]  B.E.A. Saleh,et al.  Multiplied-Poisson noise in pulse, particle, and photon detection , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[49]  M. Rabbani,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of imaging systems with amplifying and scattering mechanisms. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  Harvey J. Greenberg,et al.  New approaches for heuristic search: A bilateral linkage with artificial intelligence , 1989 .

[51]  B. Frieden.  Probability, Statistical Optics and Data Testing: A Problem Solving Approach , 2001 .

[52]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[53]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[54]  M C Teich,et al.  Role of the doubly stochastic Neyman type-A and Thomas counting distributions in photon detection. , 1981, Applied optics.

[55]  R. K. Swank.  Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[56]  C. Berg,et al.  Harmonic Analysis on Semigroups: Theory of Positive Definite and Related Functions , 1984 .

[57]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  Experimental determination of object statistics from noisy images. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[58]  E. B. Cargill,et al.  A mathematical liver model and its application to system optimization and texture analysis. , 1989 .

[59]  G. Giakoumakis,et al.  Light angular distribution of fluorescent screens excited by x-rays , 1985 .

[60]  Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. Part 1 - Detection, Estimation, and Linear Modulation Theory. , 1968 .

[61]  R Van Metter,et al.  An application of multivariate moment-generating functions to the analysis of signal and noise propagation in radiographic screen-film systems. , 1990, Medical physics.

[62]  R. K. Swank.  Measurement of absorption and noise in an x‐ray image intensifier , 1974 .

[63]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[64]  A. Parker,et al.  Spatial properties of neurons in the monkey striate cortex , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[65]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.