Priorities, policies and practice of e-government in a developing country context: ICT infrastructure and diffusion in Jamaica

This paper presents the findings of recent research into e-government policies and initiatives undertaken by the Government of Jamaica within the context of selective intervention facilitated through financial and technical assistance. In the specific context of a developing economy it highlights the use of infrastructure building and government intervention to aid diffusion of information and communication technology (ICT) and draws attention to the differences between developed and developing countries in their approach to e-government. A case of the Jamaica Customs Department is provided to exemplify the implementation of e-government in practice. Using institutional factor analysis for IT innovation the interaction of policy and practice is analysed. Four significant themes are identified that characterise the context for e-government policy, together with the associated institutional factors. The relative importance of these factors is demonstrated with Innovation Directive, Standards and Subsidy shown to be prime. These findings contribute to both institutional factor analysis for IT innovation and to ICT adoption theory, and together signal the importance of the inclusion of policy-based intervention in a future research agenda for e-government in a developing country context.

[1]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  A Temporal Model of Institutional Interventions for Information Technology Adoption in Less-Developed Countries , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Philip Selznick,et al.  Leadership in Administration : A Sociological Interpretation , 2012 .

[4]  Nigel J. Lockett,et al.  Title: the Potential of Critical E-applications for Engaging Smes in E Business: a Provider Perspective the Potential of Critical E-applications for Engaging Smes in E-business: a Provider Perspective , 2022 .

[5]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  Tilman Altenburg,et al.  The New Minimalist Approach to Private-Sector Development: A Critical Assessment , 2006 .

[8]  Lilach Nachum.  United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): World Investment Report 2000: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development United Nations, New York and Geneva 2000. (Biblio Service) , 2001 .

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Environment and Policy Factors Shaping E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2002, ICIS.

[10]  Richard Boyle,et al.  Transformational aspects of e-Government in Ireland: Issues to be addressed , 2003 .

[11]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Infrastructure, National Policy, and Global Competitiveness. , 1995 .

[12]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  Information Technology Policies and Applications in the Commonwealth Developing Countries , 1993 .

[14]  Hakikur Rahman,et al.  E-government readiness: from the design table to the grass roots , 2007, ICEGOV '07.

[15]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[16]  Anne Oldham.  Information Technology in Context , 1990 .

[17]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[18]  P. Beynon-Davies,et al.  Electronic Local Government and the Modernisation Agenda: Progress and Prospects for Public Service Improvement , 2004 .

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[20]  Robert Schware,et al.  Deploying e‐government programs: the strategic importance of “I” before “E” , 2003 .

[21]  A. Lee Gilbert,et al.  A transaction costs model of international information technology transfers: the dynamics of intelligence and control , 1992 .

[22]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  Introduction: Public Sector Reform: Only Deregulation, Privatization and Marketization? , 1997 .

[23]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Governing in the Information Age , 1998 .

[24]  Nagy K. Hanna,et al.  Why national strategies are needed for ICT-enabled development , 2003 .

[25]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change , 2007 .

[26]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service , 2001 .

[27]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[28]  W. Huang,et al.  E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study , 2006, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Government Strategies to Promote the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange: What we know and what we don't know , 1996 .

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[31]  D. West.  E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[32]  K. V. Andersen,et al.  Diffusion of e-commerce in Denmark: An analysis of institutional intervention , 2004 .

[33]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  A framework for measuring national e-readiness , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[34]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Reinventing government in the information age , 1994 .

[35]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Realising transformational stage e-government: a UK local authority perspective , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[37]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[39]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[40]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  A model for adoption and diffusion of information systems in less developed countries , 1992 .

[41]  Sarah Cotterill,et al.  Transformational Government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services , 2007 .

[42]  Zlatko J. Kovacic,et al.  A Brave New E-World? An Exploratory Analysis of Worldwide E-Government Readiness, Level of Democracy, Corruption and Globalization , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[43]  D. McKenzie,et al.  World development report 2007 : development and the next generation , 2006 .

[44]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  The Role of Information and Communication Technology in Building Trust in Governance: Towards Effectiveness and Results , 2005 .

[45]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[46]  Mary Hallward-Driemeier,et al.  World development report 2005: a better investment climate for everyone , 2004 .

[47]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  Helen Margetts,et al.  E-Government in Britain—A Decade On , 2006 .

[49]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[50]  M. Lorentzon.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[51]  Zenaida Hernández.  Industrial policy in East Asia: in search for lessons , 2004 .

[52]  Roy Balleste,et al.  RISING TOWARD APOTHEOSIS: THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE WSIS TUNIS AGENDA FOR THE INFORMATION SOCIETY , 2012 .

[53]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  Public sector reform : rationale, trends and problems , 1997 .

[54]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Seconds Out, Round Two: Contextualising E-Government Projects within their Institutional Milieu - A London Local Authority Case Study , 2004, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Diversity in Modeling Diffusion of Information Technology , 2003 .

[57]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An evaluative framework for analysing e-government convergence capability in developing countries , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[58]  Michael Preston-Shoot,et al.  A Matter of record? , 2003 .

[59]  Wayne Huang,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Adoption of Egovernment in Australian Citizens: Some Unexpected Research Findings , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User acceptance of information technology , 2001 .

[61]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .