Task Behavior and Interaction Planning for a Mobile Service Robot that Occasionally Requires Help

In our work, a robot can proactively ask for help when necessary, based on its awareness of its sensing and actuation limitations. Approaches in which humans provide help to robots do not necessarily reason about the human availability and accuracy. Instead, we model the availability of humans in the robot's environment and present a planning approach that uses such model to generate the robot navigational plans. In particular, we contribute two separate planners that allow a robot to distinguish actions that it cannot complete autonomously from ones that it can. In the first planner, the robot plans autonomous actions when possible and requests help to complete actions that it could not otherwise complete. Then for actions that it can perform autonomously, we use a POMDP policy that incorporates the human availability model to plan actions that reduce uncertainty or that increase the likelihood of the robot finding an available human to help it reduce its uncertainty. We have shown in prior work that asking people in the environment for help during tasks can reduce task completion time and increase the robot's ability to perform tasks.

[1]  Karen Zita Haigh,et al.  Xavier: experience with a layered robot architecture , 1997, SGAR.

[2]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Socially Distributed Perception: GRACE plays social tag at AAAI 2005 , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Beyond usability evaluation: analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition , 2004 .

[6]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Learning Accuracy and Availability of Humans Who Help Mobile Robots , 2011, AAAI.

[7]  Debra Schreckenghost,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems , 1999 .

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Oracular Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: A Very Special Case , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  An effective personal mobile robot agent through symbiotic human-robot interaction , 2010, AAMAS.

[11]  Brett Browning,et al.  A survey of robot learning from demonstration , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  Helge Hüttenrauch,et al.  To help or not to help a service robot - Bystander intervention as a resource in human-robot collaboration , 2006 .

[13]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A semi-autonomous communication robot — A field trial at a train station , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Is Someone in this Office Available to Help Me? , 2012, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[15]  M. Tscheligi,et al.  Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots , 2010, HRI 2010.

[16]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Robot, asker of questions , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Satoru Hayamizu,et al.  Socially Embedded Learning of the Office-Conversant Mobil Robot Jijo-2 , 1997, IJCAI.

[18]  Jean C. Scholtz,et al.  Evaluation Methods for Human-System Performance of Intelligent Systems , 2002 .

[19]  Dafna Shahaf,et al.  Generalized Task Markets for Human and Machine Computation , 2010, AAAI.

[20]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  How robots' questions affect the accuracy of the human responses , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  Marti A. Hearst Trends & Controversies: Mixed-initiative interaction , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..