A mucosal vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis generates two waves of protective memory T cells

The right combination for protection Despite its prevalence, no vaccine exists to protect against infection with the sexually transmitted bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis. Stary et al. now report on one potential vaccine candidate (see the Perspective by Brunham). Vaccinating with an ultraviolet light-inactivated C. trachomatis linked to adjuvant-containing charged nanoparticles protected female conventional and humanized mice against C. trachomatis infection. The vaccine conferred protection only when delivered through mucosal routes. Protection relied on targeting the bacteria to a particular population of immunogenic dendritic cells and inducing memory T cells that resided in the female genital tract. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.aaa8205; see also p. 1322 A nanoparticle-based vaccine protects mice against infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. [Also see Perspective by Brunham] INTRODUCTION Administering vaccines through nonmucosal routes often leads to poor protection against mucosal pathogens, presumably because such vaccines do not generate memory lymphocytes that migrate to mucosal surfaces. Although mucosal vaccination induces mucosa-tropic memory lymphocytes, few mucosal vaccines are used clinically; live vaccine vectors pose safety risks, whereas killed pathogens or molecular antigens are usually weak immunogens when applied to intact mucosa. Adjuvants can boost immunogenicity; however, most conventional mucosal adjuvants have unfavorable safety profiles. Moreover, the immune mechanisms of protection against many mucosal infections are poorly understood. RATIONALE One case in point is Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct), a sexually transmitted intracellular bacterium that infects >100 million people annually. Mucosal Ct infections can cause female infertility and ectopic pregnancies. Ct is also the leading cause of preventable blindness in developing countries and induces pneumonia in infants. No approved vaccines exist to date. Here, we describe a Ct vaccine composed of ultraviolet light–inactivated Ct (UV-Ct) conjugated to charge-switching synthetic adjuvant nanoparticles (cSAPs). After immunizing mice with live Ct, UV-Ct, or UV-Ct–cSAP conjugates, we characterized mucosal immune responses to uterine Ct rechallenge and dissected the underlying cellular mechanisms. RESULTS In previously uninfected mice, Ct infection induced protective immunity that depended on CD4 T cells producing the cytokine interferon-γ, whereas uterine exposure to UV-Ct generated tolerogenic Ct-specific regulatory T cells, resulting in exacerbated bacterial burden upon Ct rechallenge. In contrast, mucosal immunization with UV-Ct–cSAP elicited long-lived protection. This differential effect of UV-Ct–cSAP versus UV-Ct was because the former was presented by immunogenic CD11b+CD103– dendritic cells (DCs), whereas the latter was presented by tolerogenic CD11b–CD103+ DCs. Intrauterine or intranasal vaccination, but not subcutaneous vaccination, induced genital protection in both conventional and humanized mice. Regardless of vaccination route, UV-Ct–cSAP always evoked a robust systemic memory T cell response. However, only mucosal vaccination induced a wave of effector T cells that seeded the uterine mucosa during the first week after vaccination and established resident memory T cells (TRM cells). Without TRM cells, mice were suboptimally protected, even when circulating memory cells were abundant. Optimal Ct clearance required both early uterine seeding by TRM cells and infection-induced recruitment of a second wave of circulating memory cells. CONCLUSIONS Mucosal exposure to both live Ct and inactivated UV-Ct induces antigen-specific CD4 T cell responses. While immunogenic DCs present the former to promote immunity, the latter is instead targeted to tolerogenic DCs that exacerbate host susceptibility to Ct infection. By combining UV-Ct with cSAP nanocarriers, we have redirected noninfectious UV-Ct to immunogenic DCs and achieved long-lived protection. This protective vaccine effect depended on the synergistic action of two memory T cell subsets with distinct differentiation kinetics and migratory properties. The cSAP technology offers a platform for efficient mucosal immunization that may also be applicable to other mucosal pathogens. Protection against C. trachomatis infection after mucosal UV-Ct–cSAP vaccination. Upon mucosal vaccination, dendritic cells carry UV-Ct–cSAP to lymph nodes and stimulate CD4 T cells. Effector T cells are imprinted to traffic to uterine mucosa (first wave) and establish tissue-resident memory cells (TRM cells). Vaccination also generates circulating memory T cells. Upon genital Ct infection, local reactivation of uterine TRM cells triggers the recruitment of the circulating memory subset (second wave). Optimal pathogen clearance requires both waves of memory cells. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) infection induces protective immunity that depends on interferon-γ–producing CD4 T cells. By contrast, we report that mucosal exposure to ultraviolet light (UV)–inactivated Ct (UV-Ct) generated regulatory T cells that exacerbated subsequent Ct infection. We show that mucosal immunization with UV-Ct complexed with charge-switching synthetic adjuvant particles (cSAPs) elicited long-lived protection in conventional and humanized mice. UV-Ct–cSAP targeted immunogenic uterine CD11b+CD103– dendritic cells (DCs), whereas UV-Ct accumulated in tolerogenic CD11b–CD103+ DCs. Regardless of vaccination route, UV-Ct–cSAP induced systemic memory T cells, but only mucosal vaccination induced effector T cells that rapidly seeded uterine mucosa with resident memory T cells (TRM cells). Optimal Ct clearance required both TRM seeding and subsequent infection-induced recruitment of circulating memory T cells. Thus, UV-Ct–cSAP vaccination generated two synergistic memory T cell subsets with distinct migratory properties.

[1]  M. Bevan,et al.  Proinflammatory microenvironments within the intestine regulate differentiation of tissue-resident CD8 T cells responding to infection , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[2]  J. Schenkel,et al.  Resident memory CD8 T cells trigger protective innate and adaptive immune responses , 2014, Science.

[3]  Andrew J. Olive,et al.  Integrin α4β1 Is Necessary for CD4+ T Cell–Mediated Protection against Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection , 2014, The Journal of Immunology.

[4]  M. Burton,et al.  Towards a safe and effective chlamydial vaccine: Lessons from the eye , 2014, Vaccine.

[5]  R. Langer,et al.  Adjuvant-carrying synthetic vaccine particles augment the immune response to encapsulated antigen and exhibit strong local immune activation without inducing systemic cytokine release , 2014, Vaccine.

[6]  Giuseppe Penna,et al.  Oral tolerance can be established via gap junction transfer of fed antigens from CX3CR1⁺ macrophages to CD103⁺ dendritic cells. , 2014, Immunity.

[7]  S. McSorley,et al.  B Cells Enhance Antigen-Specific CD4 T Cell Priming and Prevent Bacteria Dissemination following Chlamydia muridarum Genital Tract Infection , 2013, PLoS pathogens.

[8]  S. Lensing,et al.  Spontaneous resolution of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and protection from reinfection. , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  R. Brunham Immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis. , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  D. Tifrea,et al.  Vaccination with the Recombinant Major Outer Membrane Protein Elicits Antibodies to the Constant Domains and Induces Cross-Serovar Protection against Intranasal Challenge with Chlamydia trachomatis , 2013, Infection and Immunity.

[11]  Reena Mahajan,et al.  Sexually Transmitted Infections Among US Women and Men: Prevalence and Incidence Estimates, 2008 , 2013, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[12]  J. Schenkel,et al.  Sensing and alarm function of resident memory CD8+ T cells , 2013, Nature Immunology.

[13]  M. Burton,et al.  Research Online , 2022 .

[14]  David C. Gondek,et al.  CD4+ T Cells Are Necessary and Sufficient To Confer Protection against Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in the Murine Upper Genital Tract , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  A. Iwasaki,et al.  A vaccine strategy protects against genital herpes by establishing local memory T cells , 2012, Nature.

[16]  N. Lycke Recent progress in mucosal vaccine development: potential and limitations , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[17]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Vaccines against mucosal infections. , 2012, Current opinion in immunology.

[18]  T. Lu,et al.  Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics. , 2012, ACS nano.

[19]  Rodney D. Newberry,et al.  Goblet cells deliver luminal antigen to CD103+ DCs in the small intestine , 2012, Nature.

[20]  Charlotte L. Scott,et al.  Intestinal CD103+ dendritic cells: master regulators of tolerance? , 2011, Trends in immunology.

[21]  C. Murphy,et al.  Pre-injury polypharmacy as a predictor of outcomes in trauma patients , 2011, International journal of critical illness and injury science.

[22]  J. Clements,et al.  Defending the mucosa: adjuvant and carrier formulations for mucosal immunity. , 2011, Current opinion in immunology.

[23]  R. Morrison,et al.  Vaccination against Chlamydia Genital Infection Utilizing the Murine C. muridarum Model , 2010, Infection and Immunity.

[24]  David C. Gondek,et al.  CXCR3 AND CCR5 ARE BOTH REQUIRED FOR T CELL MEDIATED PROTECTION AGAINST C. TRACHOMATIS INFECTION IN THE MURINE GENITAL MUCOSA , 2010, Mucosal Immunology.

[25]  S. Morrison,et al.  CD4+ T Cells and Antibody Are Required for Optimal Major Outer Membrane Protein Vaccine-Induced Immunity to Chlamydia muridarum Genital Infection , 2010, Infection and Immunity.

[26]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Protective immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: evidence from human studies. , 2010, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[27]  P. Puccetti,et al.  Gut CD103+ dendritic cells express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase which influences T regulatory/T effector cell balance and oral tolerance induction , 2010, Gut.

[28]  R. Webby,et al.  Dynamic T cell migration program provides resident memory within intestinal epithelium , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  M. Bevan,et al.  Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. , 2010, Immunity.

[30]  Andrew D. Luster,et al.  Induction of Robust Cellular and Humoral Virus-Specific Adaptive Immune Responses in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Humanized BLT Mice , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[31]  Thomas Gebhardt,et al.  Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[32]  A. Iwasaki,et al.  Differential roles of migratory and resident DCs in T cell priming after mucosal or skin HSV-1 infection , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  J. Garcia,et al.  Functional and phenotypic characterization of the humanized BLT mouse model. , 2008, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[34]  I. Bakken Chlamydia trachomatis and ectopic pregnancy: recent epidemiological findings , 2008, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[35]  Junliang Pan,et al.  DCs metabolize sunlight-induced vitamin D3 to 'program' T cell attraction to the epidermal chemokine CCL27 , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[36]  P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli,et al.  Generation of Gut-Homing IgA-Secreting B Cells by Intestinal Dendritic Cells , 2006, Science.

[37]  Todd M. Gierahn,et al.  Monitoring the T cell response to genital tract infection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  H. Weiner,et al.  Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells , 2006, Nature.

[39]  M. Starnbach,et al.  Genetic analysis of susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis in mouse , 2006, Genes and Immunity.

[40]  S. Morrison,et al.  A Predominant Role for Antibody in Acquired Immunity to Chlamydial Genital Tract Reinfection1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[41]  J. Mcghee,et al.  Enterotoxin-Based Mucosal Adjuvants Alter Antigen Trafficking and Induce Inflammatory Responses in the Nasal Tract , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[42]  Z. Xing,et al.  Mechanisms of Mucosal and Parenteral Tuberculosis Vaccinations: Adenoviral-Based Mucosal Immunization Preferentially Elicits Sustained Accumulation of Immune Protective CD4 and CD8 T Cells within the Airway Lumen1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[43]  T. Denning,et al.  Cutting Edge: CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Impaired for Intestinal Homing Can Prevent Colitis12 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[44]  R. Brunham,et al.  Immunology of Chlamydia infection: implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[45]  Peri Nagappan,et al.  Fc receptor-mediated antibody regulation of T cell immunity against intracellular pathogens. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[46]  Wolfgang Weninger,et al.  Selective imprinting of gut-homing T cells by Peyer's patch dendritic cells , 2003, Nature.

[47]  E. Butcher,et al.  Rapid Acquisition of Tissue-specific Homing Phenotypes by CD4+ T Cells Activated in Cutaneous or Mucosal Lymphoid Tissues , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[48]  Irving L. Weissman,et al.  Physiological Migration of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells , 2001, Science.

[49]  Wolfgang Weninger,et al.  Migratory Properties of Naive, Effector, and Memory Cd8+ T Cells , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[50]  C. Mackay,et al.  T-cell function and migration. Two sides of the same coin. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  K. Kelly,et al.  Expression of Mucosal Homing Receptor α4β7 Is Associated with Enhanced Migration to theChlamydia-Infected Murine Genital Mucosa In Vivo , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[52]  A. Sher,et al.  Analysis of Fractalkine Receptor CX3CR1 Function by Targeted Deletion and Green Fluorescent Protein Reporter Gene Insertion , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[53]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[54]  C. Benoist,et al.  Mice lacking all conventional MHC class II genes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  C. Elson,et al.  Differential homing commitments of antigen-specific T cells after oral or parenteral immunization in humans. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[56]  K. Rosenthal,et al.  Long-lived cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory in mucosal tissues after mucosal but not systemic immunization , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[57]  J. Schachter Overview of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and the requirements for a vaccine. , 1985, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[58]  J. Bienenstock The mucosal immunologic network. , 1984, Annals of allergy.

[59]  K. Holmes,et al.  Correlation of host immune response with quantitative recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the human endocervix , 1983, Infection and immunity.

[60]  C. Griscelli,et al.  The mouse gut T lymphocyte, a novel type of T cell. Nature, origin, and traffic in mice in normal and graft-versus-host conditions , 1978, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[61]  L. Collier,et al.  Trachoma vaccine field trials in The Gambia , 1969, Epidemiology and Infection.

[62]  R. Nichols,et al.  Studies on trachoma. VI. Microbiological observations in a field trial in Saudi Arabia of bivalent rachoma vaccine at three dosage levels. , 1969, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[63]  C. Neave,et al.  Field trial of a monovalent and of a bivalent mineral oil adjuvant trachoma vaccine in Taiwan school children. , 1967, American journal of ophthalmology.

[64]  E. S. Murray,et al.  Studies on trachoma. V. Clinical observations in a field trial of bivalent trachoma vaccine at three dosage levels in Saudi Arabia. , 1966, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[65]  J. Grayston,et al.  TRACHOMA VACCINE STUDIES ON TAIWAN * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.