Face recognition impairments despite normal holistic processing and face space coding: Evidence from a case of developmental prosopagnosia

Holistic processing and face space coding are widely considered primary perceptual mechanisms behind good face recognition. Here, however, we present the case of S.P., a developmental prosopagnosic who demonstrated severe impairments in face memory and face perception, yet showed normal holistic processing and face space coding. Across three composite experiments, S.P. showed normal-strength holistic processing for upright faces and no composite effect for inverted faces. Across five aftereffect experiments, S.P. showed normal-sized face aftereffects, which derived normally from face space rather than shape-generic mechanisms. The case of S.P. implies: (a) normal holistic processing and face space coding can be insufficient for good face recognition even when present in combination; and (b) the focus of recent literature on holistic processing and face space should be expanded to include other potential face processing mechanisms (e.g., part-based processing). Our article also highlights the importance of internal task reliability in drawing inferences from single-case studies.

[1]  B. Duchaine,et al.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[2]  L. Jeffery,et al.  Abnormal adaptive coding of identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011 .

[3]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation and face perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  C. Jacques,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: Disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  E. McKone,et al.  Solving the upside-down puzzle: Why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  E. McKone,et al.  Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[10]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[11]  E. McKone,et al.  Are objects like faces? Norm-based versus exemplar-based coding as revealed by adaptation aftereffects , 2010 .

[12]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Brad Pitt & Jude Law: Individual-contingent face aftereffects and norm- versus exemplar-based models of face-space , 2010 .

[13]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. McKone,et al.  What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation , 2010, Vision Research.

[17]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Heritability of the Specific Cognitive Ability of Face Perception , 2010, Current Biology.

[18]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.

[19]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-sensitivity of face identity aftereffects , 2009, Vision Research.

[21]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  E. McKone,et al.  The Composite Task Reveals Stronger Holistic Processing in Children than Adults for Child Faces , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  G. Yovel,et al.  Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  On percentile norms in neuropsychology: Proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores , 2009, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[26]  W. Sommer,et al.  Toward a comprehensive test battery for face cognition: Assessment of the tasks , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[27]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Fitting the child's mind to the world: adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity in 8-year-olds. , 2008, Developmental science.

[28]  B. Rossion.  Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[29]  E. McKone.  Configural processing and face viewpoint. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: a family study. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[31]  D. Burr,et al.  Abnormal Adaptive Face-Coding Mechanisms in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2007, Current Biology.

[32]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Abnormal fMRI Adaptation to Unfamiliar Faces in a Case of Developmental Prosopamnesia , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[34]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[36]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation , 2007, Vision Research.

[37]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  View-specific coding of face shape. , 2010, Psychological science.

[38]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  G. Rhodes,et al.  View-Specific Coding of Face Shape , 2006 .

[43]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: a Window to Content-specific Face Processing This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited Developmental Prosopagnosia and Inferences to Functional Organization Investigating the Architecture of Face Processing through Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2022 .

[44]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  High-level Pattern Coding Revealed by Brief Shape Aftereffects , 2005 .

[47]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[48]  Christof Koch,et al.  Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face , 2005, Neuron.

[49]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[50]  T. Maddess,et al.  Factors governing the adaptation of cells in area-17 of the cat visual cortex , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[51]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Fitting the mind to the World , 2003, Psychological science.

[52]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? , 2003, Cognition.

[53]  Franc Solina,et al.  COLOR-BASED FACE DETECTION IN THE "15 SECONDS OF FAME" ART INSTALLATION , 2003 .

[54]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[57]  R. Pearson,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? , 2001, Neurocase.

[58]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[60]  D. Bors,et al.  Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form , 1998 .

[61]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[62]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[63]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[64]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Birmingham object recognition battery , 1993 .

[65]  D. Regan,et al.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size , 1992, Vision Research.

[66]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[67]  A. Young,et al.  ARE FACES SPECIAL , 1989 .

[68]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[69]  P. Ley.  Quantitative aspects of psychological assessment: An introduction, , 1972 .

[70]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[71]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .