Predicting the cavitating marine propeller noise at design stage: A deep learning based approach

Abstract The importance of reducing the noise impact of ships is being recognised worldwide. Consequently, the inclusion of this principle among the objectives and constraints of new designs is becoming a standard. For this reason, considerable attention is given to the propeller being often the dominant source of underwater radiated noise, especially when cavitation occurs, as it happens in most cases when a ship sails at design speed. The designers of quieter propulsion systems require the availability of predictive tools able to verify the compliance with noise requirements and to compare the effectiveness of different design solutions. In this context, tools able to provide a reliable estimate of propeller noise spectra based just on the information available during propeller design represent a fundamental tool to speed up the design process avoiding model scale tests. This work focuses on developing a tool able to predict the cavitating marine propeller generated noise spectra at design stage exploiting the most recent advances in Deep Learning, able to take advantage of both structured and unstructured data, and in hybrid modelling, able to exploit both data and physical knowledge about the problem. For this purpose authors will make use of a dataset collected by means of dedicated model scale measurements in a cavitation tunnel combined with the detailed flow characterisation obtainable by calculations carried out with a Boundary Element Method. The performance of the proposed approaches are analysed considering different scenarios and different definitions of the input and output variable used during the modelisation.

[1]  Diego Villa,et al.  An Investigation on the Discrepancies Between RANSE and BEM Approaches for the Prediction of Marine Propeller Unsteady Performances in Strongly Non-Homogeneous Wakes , 2014 .

[2]  Spyridon A Kinnas,et al.  Boundary element method for the analysis of the unsteady flow aroundextreme propeller geometries , 1992 .

[3]  Dipankar Das,et al.  Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-Based Opinion Mining , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[4]  Fred H. Proctor,et al.  Three-Phased Wake Vortex Decay , 2010 .

[5]  Hendrik Willem Marie Hoeijmakers,et al.  Evaluation of the radial pressure distribution of vortex models and comparison with experimental data , 2015 .

[6]  Jian Sun,et al.  Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[7]  Luca Oneto,et al.  Model scale cavitation noise spectra prediction: Combining physical knowledge with data science , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[8]  S. Kinnas,et al.  A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two- and three-dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Y. L. Young,et al.  A BEM for the Prediction of Unsteady Midchord Face and/or Back Propeller Cavitation , 2001 .

[10]  Diego Villa,et al.  Steady cavitating propeller performance by using OpenFOAM, StarCCM+and a boundary element method , 2017 .

[11]  Stuart D. Jessup,et al.  Tip Vortex Cavitation Inception Scaling for High Reynolds Number Applications , 2009 .

[12]  Donald Roe Ross,et al.  Mechanics of underwater noise , 1976 .

[13]  Jong Jae Lee,et al.  A SURFACE PANEL METHOD FOR THE HYDRODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DUCTED PROPELLERS , 1987 .

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[15]  Ole Winther,et al.  A Machine-Learning Approach to Predict Main Energy Consumption under Realistic Operational Conditions , 2012 .

[16]  A. Yücel Odabaşi,et al.  ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR WAKE QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 1978 .

[17]  Stuart D. Jessup,et al.  An experimental investigation of viscous aspects of propeller blade flow , 1989 .

[18]  Chen Wang,et al.  Competitive Deep-Belief Networks for Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition , 2018, Sensors.

[19]  Hanseong Lee,et al.  Application of a Boundary Element Method in the Prediction of Unsteady Blade Sheet and Developed Tip Vortex Cavitation on Marine Propellers , 2004 .

[20]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  CPP propeller cavitation and noise optimization at different pitches with panel code and validation by cavitation tunnel measurements , 2012 .

[21]  Stefano Gaggero,et al.  Numerical design of a RIM-driven thruster using a RANS-based optimization approach , 2020 .

[22]  Giulio Dubbioso,et al.  Propeller modeling approaches for off–design operative conditions , 2019, Ocean Engineering.

[23]  Johan Bosschers An analytical and semi-empirical model for the viscous flow around a vortex cavity , 2018, International Journal of Multiphase Flow.

[24]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2003, ICTAI.

[25]  Batuhan Aktas,et al.  A systematic experimental approach to cavitation noise prediction of marine propellers , 2017 .

[26]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Numerical modeling of supercavitating propeller flows , 2003 .

[27]  Twp Smith,et al.  Assessment of Shipping's Efficiency Using Satellite AIS data , 2013 .

[28]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[29]  Giorgio Tani,et al.  Aspects of the measurement of the acoustic transfer function in a cavitation tunnel , 2019 .

[30]  Davide Anguita,et al.  Vessels fuel consumption forecast and trim optimisation: A data analytics perspective , 2017 .

[31]  Diego Villa,et al.  Efficient and multi-objective cavitating propeller optimization: An application to a high-speed craft , 2017 .

[32]  José Manoel de Seixas,et al.  Principal component analysis for classifying passive sonar signals , 2001, ISCAS 2001. The 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.01CH37196).

[33]  M Godjevac,et al.  Ship diesel engine performance modelling with combined physical and machine learning approach , 2018, Proceedings of the International Ship Control Systems Symposium (iSCSS).

[34]  A E Raestad,et al.  TIP VORTEX INDEX - AN ENGINEERING APPROACH TO PROPELLER NOISE PREDICTION , 1996 .

[35]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[36]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[37]  S. Gaggero,et al.  Cavitating Propeller Performance in Inclined Shaft Conditions with OpenFOAM: PPTC 2015 Test Case , 2018 .

[38]  L. C. Burrill,et al.  Propeller cavitation: Further tests on 16in. propeller models in the King’s College cavitation tunnel1: Merchant ship propellers with four, five and six blades , 1963 .

[39]  Luca Oneto,et al.  Model Selection and Error Estimation in a Nutshell , 2020, Modeling and Optimization in Science and Technologies.

[40]  Johan Bosschers,et al.  Investigation of hull pressure fluctuations generated by cavitating vortices , 2009 .

[41]  Giovanni Bernardini,et al.  Automated Marine Propeller Optimal Design Combining Hydrodynamics Models and Neural Networks , 2012 .

[42]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Multilayer Perceptron , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[43]  Shai Ben-David,et al.  Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms , 2014 .

[44]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[45]  Roger E. A. Arndt,et al.  The Case of the Singing Vortex , 1997 .

[46]  Johan Bosschers,et al.  A Semi-Empirical Prediction Method for Broadband Hull-Pressure Fluctuations and Underwater Radiated Noise by Propeller Tip Vortex Cavitation † , 2018 .

[47]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning , 2016, AAAI.

[48]  Giorgio Tani,et al.  Cavitation tunnel acoustic characterisation and application to model propeller radiated noise measurements at different functioning conditions , 2016 .

[49]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[50]  Stefano Gaggero,et al.  Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms , 2016 .

[51]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[52]  Spyros A. Kinnas,et al.  A NONLINEAR BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF UNSTEADY PROPELLER SHEET CAVITATION , 1994 .

[53]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[54]  Davide Anguita,et al.  Condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion systems: Data analysis with minimal feedback , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[55]  Mehmet Atlar,et al.  Two medium size cavitation tunnel hydro-acoustic benchmark experiment comparisons as part of a round robin test campaign , 2017 .

[56]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  RANS and PANEL method for unsteady flow propeller analysis , 2010 .