Comparative evaluation of electric wheelchair manoeuvrability.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether manoeuvrability varied between electric wheelchairs. DESIGN Randomized, prospective, repeated measures design. SUBJECTS Twelve wheelchair users. METHODS Three different electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (Invacare Storm 3, Ottobock B500, and Meyra Champ) intended for use by patients with severe impairments were tested over an indoor and an outdoor circuit. Points were assigned when the users touched the circuit boundaries or failed to pass obstacles. The users completed the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire (QUEST). RESULTS Performance was significantly worse with Ottobock B500 compared with the other 2 wheelchairs on the indoor test (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05 for both comparisons) and compared with Invacare Storm on the outdoor test (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). The mean 6-item QUEST score, effectiveness, and simplicity of use were significantly worse for Ottobock B500 than for the other 2 wheelchairs (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Differences in manoeuvrability exist between commercially available electric wheelchairs belonging to the same category. Driving tests and QUEST provide complementary and concordant information.

[1]  Isabelle Laffont,et al.  Evaluation of a stair-climbing power wheelchair in 25 people with tetraplegia. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Claudine Auger,et al.  Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  L Demers,et al.  Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Preliminary assessment of a prototype advanced mobility device in the work environment of veterans with spinal cord injury. , 2004, NeuroRehabilitation.

[5]  M. Winance,et al.  Demographics of wheelchair users in France: results of national community-based handicaps-incapacités-dépendance surveys. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  A. Frank,et al.  Older adults' use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[7]  G. A. Smith,et al.  Wheelchair related injuries treated in US emergency departments , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[8]  M. Shields,et al.  Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. , 2004, Health reports.

[9]  Roger O. Smith,et al.  Assistive Technology in the Measurement of Rehabilitation and Health Outcomes: A Review and Analysis of Instruments , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR SAFETY—ADVERSE REPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Durability, value, and reliability of selected electric powered wheelchairs. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.