Why Computing Students Learn on Their Own

In this article, we address the question of why computing students choose to learn computing topics on their own. A better understanding of why some students choose to learn on their own may help us to motivate other students to develop this important skill. In addition, it may help in curriculum design; if we need to leave some topics out of our expanding curriculum, a good choice might be those topics that students readily learn on their own. Based on a thematic analysis of 17 semistructured interviews, we found that computing students’ motivations for self-directed learning fall into four general themes: projects, social and peer interactions, joy of learning, and fear. Under these, we describe several more specific subthemes, illustrated in the words of the students. The project-related and social motivations are quite prominent. Although these motivations appear in the literature, they received greater emphasis from our interviewees. Perhaps most characteristic of computing is the motivation to learn to complete some project, both projects done for fun and projects required for school or work.

[1]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[2]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[3]  J. McNally.  Self-Directed Learning, A Guide for Learners and Teachers , 1976 .

[4]  Ralph Morelli,et al.  Evaluating student experiences in developing software for humanity , 2009, ITiCSE '09.

[5]  Juan C. Burguillo,et al.  Using game theory and Competition-based Learning to stimulate student motivation and performance , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  C. Dweck,et al.  Can Personality Be Changed? The Role of Beliefs in Personality and Change , 2008 .

[7]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Computing students learning computing informally , 2010, Koli Calling.

[8]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Discovering computing: perspectives of web designers , 2010, ICER '10.

[9]  Peter Nenniger.  On the role of motivation in self-directed learning: The “two-shells-model of motivated self-directed learning” as a structural explanatory concept , 1999 .

[10]  C. Dweck,et al.  Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. , 1999 .

[12]  Marilla D. Svinicki,et al.  New Directions in Learning and Motivation. , 1999 .

[13]  L. Helle,et al.  Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots , 2006 .

[14]  Samuel Solleiro.  Ain't nothing like the real thing , 2012 .

[15]  L. Helle,et al.  'Ain't nothin' like the real thing'. Motivation and study processes on a work-based project course in information systems design. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[16]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[17]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Students' perceptions of the differences between formal and informal learning , 2011, ICER.

[18]  Gerald Grow.  Teaching Learners To Be Self-Directed , 1991 .

[19]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[20]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[21]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Self-directed learning: stories from industry , 2012, Koli Calling.

[22]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Graphic designers who program as informal computer science learners , 2006, ICER '06.

[23]  T. Murphey.  Book Review DRIVE: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us , 2009 .

[24]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[25]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Self‐directed Learning Readiness Among Engineering Undergraduate Students , 2005 .

[26]  Alessio Gaspar,et al.  Self direction & constructivism in programming education , 2008, SIGITE '08.

[27]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness , 2000 .