Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.

A three-dimensional (3D) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) pretreatment verification procedure has been developed based on the measurement of two-dimensional (2D) primary fluence profiles using an amorphous silicon flat-panel electronic portal imaging device (EPID). As described in our previous work, fluence profiles are extracted from EPID images by deconvolution with kernels that represent signal spread in the EPID due to radiation and optical scattering. The deconvolution kernels are derived using Monte Carlo simulations of dose deposition in the EPID and empirical fitting methods, for both 6 and 15 MV photon energies. In our new 3D verification technique, 2D fluence modulation profiles for each IMRT field in a treatment are used as input to a treatment planning system (TPS), which then generates 3D doses. Verification is accomplished by comparing this new EPID-based 3D dose distribution to the planned dose distribution calculated by the TPS. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) point dose measurements for an IMRT treatment of an anthropomorphic phantom were in good agreement with the EPID-based 3D doses; in contrast, the planned dose under-predicts the TLD measurement in a high-gradient region by approximately 16%. Similarly, large discrepancies between EPID-based and TPS doses were also evident in dose profiles of small fields incident on a water phantom. These results suggest that our 3D EPID-based method is effective in quantifying relevant uncertainties in the dose calculations of our TPS for IMRT treatments. For three clinical head and neck cancer IMRT treatment plans, our TPS was found to underestimate the mean EPID-based doses in the critical structures of the spinal cord and the parotids by approximately 4 Gy (11%-14%). According to radiobiological modeling calculations that were performed, such underestimates can potentially lead to clinically significant underpredictions of normal tissue complication rates.

[1]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  Dosimetric verification of x-ray fields with steep dose gradients using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  B G Fallone,et al.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  K. Lam,et al.  Relative dosimetry using active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) technology. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  R. Mohan,et al.  Monte Carlo computation of dosimetric amorphous silicon electronic portal images. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  D Huyskens,et al.  Pre-treatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  James F Dempsey,et al.  Verification of step-and-shoot IMRT delivery using a fast video-based electronic portal imaging device. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  Ben J.M. Heijmen,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device. , 1999 .

[13]  B. McCurdy,et al.  Dosimetric investigation and portal dose image prediction using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  B. Gino Fallone,et al.  A TCP‐NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[16]  M van Herk,et al.  Three-dimensional dose reconstruction of breast cancer treatment using portal imaging. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  B R Paliwal,et al.  Modeling dose distributions from portal dose images using the convolution/superposition method. , 1996, Medical physics.

[18]  D W O Rogers,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  Anders Ahnesjö,et al.  Dose calculation methods in photon beam therapy using energy deposition kernels , 1991 .

[20]  J. Battermann,et al.  Qantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotheraphy in the head-and-neck region , 2001 .

[21]  M Partridge,et al.  IMRT verification by three-dimensional dose reconstruction from portal beam measurements. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  C C Ling,et al.  Relative profile and dose verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.