Space exploration in neglect.

The present study investigated the gaze as well as the head and the eye-in-head movements of neglect patients while they were exploring their surroundings. A random configuration of letters was presented on the inner surface of a sphere that surrounded the subject, requiring free exploratory eye and head movements. The subjects were requested to search for a single (non-existent) target letter. The co-ordination of eye and head movements in patients with neglect resembled the pattern usually observed in healthy subjects orienting to eccentric visual targets. They performed hypometric head movements with additional shifts of eye-in-head position. Moreover, like healthy subjects, the patients with neglect explored space with gaze, with head and eye-in-head movements that were symmetrically distributed around preferred orientations in space. However, in contrast to controls, these centres of exploration were shifted towards the right. The average horizontal position of gaze and of head movements lay right of the body's mid-sagittal plane, the average eye-in-head position right of the head midline. The preferred orientations were located far away from the anatomical limits of horizontal gaze, head and eye-in-head movements. The decrease of exploration towards more eccentric locations left and right of these orientations thus could not be explained by anatomical restrictions. The results argue against a model of neglect that proposes a lateral gradient of attentional orienting towards the ipsilesional side. Exploring the surroundings, the patients did not orient gaze, the head or the eyes in the head towards the extreme ipsilesional side, nor even close to it. The results favour a deviation model suggesting a shift of the whole frame for exploratory behaviour towards the ipsilesional side. In addition to this shift, we found a second component of altered visual exploration in neglect. The patients' head and gaze movements exhibited a reduced variability around the deviated centre of exploration. The variability was not generally reduced but rather concerned specifically the horizontal dimension. The latter was found even when the area of exploration was paralleled between the groups, requiring the control subjects to search only in that part of the letter array that the neglect patients had explored spontaneously. Possible mechanisms, such as a disturbed ability to update the spatial representation of visual targets or an altered neural representation of space in the horizontal dimension, are discussed.

[1]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[2]  S. E. Black,et al.  Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Hans Samuelsson,et al.  Anatomical and Neurological Correlates of Acute and Chronic Visuospatial Neglect Following Right Hemisphere Stroke * * Some of the results of this study were presented at: The 5th Nordic Meeting in Neuropsychology, Uppsala, Sweden, August 17-19, 1995. , 1997, Cortex.

[4]  H. Karnath,et al.  Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  A. Milner Animal Models for the Syndrome of Spatial Neglect , 1987 .

[6]  T. Uemura,et al.  Eye-head coordination during lateral gaze in normal subjects. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  M. Kinsbourne Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[8]  M. Perenin,et al.  Tactile exploration of peripersonal space in patients with neglect , 1998, Neuroreport.

[9]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Spatial Compression in Visual Neglect: A Case Study , 1991, Cortex.

[10]  R A Andersen,et al.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[12]  J Zihl,et al.  Patterns of oculomotor scanning in patients with unilateral posterior parietal or frontal lobe damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  J. Hornak,et al.  Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[16]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[17]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[18]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Spatial neglect : position papers on theory and practice , 1994 .

[20]  M. Gresty Coordination of head and eye movements to fixate continuous and intermittent targets. , 1974, Vision research.

[21]  H. Karnath Disturbed coordinate transformation in the neural representation of space as the crucial mechanism leading to neglect , 1994 .

[22]  J. Marshall,et al.  When is a cue not a cue? On the intractability of visuospatial neglect , 1992 .

[23]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in back space. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  In search for the egocentric reference. A neurophysiological hypothesis , 1984, Neuropsychologia.